Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Maybe if the Green Bigots suffer the same treatment other fans get from the Blue Bigots when stuck in the corner of being pelted with coins, pies, drinks and everything else and it all so close it cannot be ignored there is a possibility of the SFA dealing with the issue that they ignore when every other team visits there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Scosha said:

Robertson: We cannot have a repeat to scenes after Celtic Park match

A disabled fan asks: “I was injured at the last Old Firm game as a result of the ‘thug like’ behaviour of the Celtic players. Can you comment?”

Stewart Robertson replies “Having seen the effects of what happened in September, players have a responsibility to be very careful about their reaction during and after games because every action can have a reaction.

“We cannot have a repeat of that (scenes at the end of the first Old Firm game). Players have to be conscious of what they are doing and we have to hope we don’t see a repeat of that - anywhere.”

:lol::lol::lol: 

The Rangers board blaming Celtic players for Rangers fans at Parkhead's behaviour leading to an injury on a disabled person :lol: 

If only they behaved like grown ups. 

As did the police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangers would argue that grass isn't green just to spite Celtic.
Celtic would argue that the sky isn't blue just to spite Rangers.
Both should be shut down immediately.


Rangers would release a statement declaring that the grass was rightfully blue, however Celtic fc and their cohorts have managed to manipulate the media and the rest of the footballing world into thinking it is indeed green.

This has undoubtedly had a negative and damaging effect on the history and traditions of Rangers fc and from this point forthwith, until the grass is rightfully viewed as a noble and dignified shade of blue, everyone is to be considered an enemy of the peepul and the Rangers fc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Drew Brees said:

 

Quote

One big question is how long Rangers can afford to live beyond its means. Or to put it more positively: how long and how much will this investment strategy require before it delivers profitable results?

It was a question put to Dave King at the AGM, to which the answer came: "As long as it takes".

Hmm, that rings a bell.

Quote

In a quest to fulfil Murray's ambitions for Rangers in Europe, a period of unprecedented spending under the managership of Dick Advocaat saw the club's debts increase. As anticipated television revenues failed to materialise and the club's income failed to offset the growing cost of transfer fees and player salaries. Murray said; "For every five pounds Celtic spend, we will spend ten," in 1998. By 2001, with the appointment of Alex McLeish as manager, Murray acknowledged that mistakes were made, saying "we got it wrong. We obviously spent far too much money. We can’t let it happen again because that would be total mismanagement."

It's well-established in the courts that King is lying whenever his lips move, but I'm starting to wonder if he's actually trolling the fans and the media. It's starting to read more like satire than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

As part of his evidence King also listed key shareholders who, he says, have told him the will not take up the offer.

One of the investors mentioned was former chairman of the football board Sandy Easdale. Mr Easdale has since told the BBC he has given no such undertaking.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46403987

 

Lying cnut just can't help himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rate This

 

 

Following the break King has provided the court with an undertaking which will be published on the RFC website by 3rd Dec. 

A cash confiirmer to be appointed by 14 Dec. 

11 Jan for the cleared funds to be in place in the UK. 

25th Jan for the offer to be made. 

Appoint a legal advisor familiar with the Takeover code by 14 Dec. 

The undertaking is not opposed by TOP. 

Lady Wolffe is not minded to discharge the action and will continue the proof until 4 February with King ordained to attend if it goes ahead. 

A check will be made on progress by 29 Jan. in a "by order" hearing. If all is in hand by then the proof will be discharged. 

Lady Wolffe addressed King directly and made it clear that he will be obliged to attend in February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rate This

 

 

Following the break King has provided the court with an undertaking which will be published on the RFC website by 3rd Dec. 

A cash confiirmer to be appointed by 14 Dec. 

11 Jan for the cleared funds to be in place in the UK. 

25th Jan for the offer to be made. 

Appoint a legal advisor familiar with the Takeover code by 14 Dec. 

The undertaking is not opposed by TOP. 

Lady Wolffe is not minded to discharge the action and will continue the proof until 4 February with King ordained to attend if it goes ahead. 

A check will be made on progress by 29 Jan. in a "by order" hearing. If all is in hand by then the proof will be discharged. 

Lady Wolffe addressed King directly and made it clear that he will be obliged to attend in February.

He's not going to meet any of those deadlines, well at least not in full.

Except maybe the 3rd Dec one. [emoji19]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...