Stu Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Now I think about it, that looks like some classic Leggo pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WILLIEA Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 And another wee nugget of a quote Wish you hadn't posted that. Reminded me that that wee goalie c*nt had a spell with us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 "It was necessary to let Whyte view the piece so that it would be difficult for him to try to deny it later." I have never heard such utter pish in all my life. Traynor's blog makes it sound like he was involved in some James Bond style espionage in a bid to bring down Whyte. Only one keyboard warrior/internet bampot making an arse of himself tonight. It wasn't a blog ...and that sounds more up 00Killies street.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 This is the sort of shit that Thomson should have stuck to. Actual revelatory stuff which is backed up. We already knew all of this about Jim Traynor, and it stands to reason that a disgraced journalist be in a position at a disgraced football club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It wasn't??? What was it then?? An article on the clubs website. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It wasn't a blog ...and that sounds more up 00Killies street.... It must be a tad irritating that Traynor is now using the Rangers website to publish articles in his defence of such allegations. At the end of the day, Thomson's article is an attack on Traynor - not Rangers. He is supposed to be in charge of the PR at Ibrox is he not. It's difficult to see how he could be making a bigger c**t of that tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Whats the difference? Thinks all articles on websites are blogs ^^^^ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It's traynor's blog, published on the rangers website. A bit like thommo's blog, published on the ch4 website. Which traynor has a dig at. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It must be a tad irritating that Traynor is now using the Rangers website to publish articles in his defence of such allegations. At the end of the day, Thomson's article is an attack on Traynor - not Rangers. He is supposed to be in charge of the PR at Ibrox is he not. It's difficult to see how he could be making a bigger c**t of that tbh. No difference from putting articles on the records website really (i've left you an open goal here) Thomsons article was bit of a let down, while Traynors reply though plausible is something i have no experience in. Traynnor setting up and rebranding the media side of things for the club, not really PR but we're agreed it's not blog atleast. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kildog Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 It's going to be referred to as "Traynor's Blog" no matter what he or anyone says. Hope it winds the fat p***k right up. Like the amigos in here, he has become that which he hates 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadSaint Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Jim Traynor is a great weapon At last Charles Green says something we can agree on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 No difference from putting articles on the records website really (i've left you an open goal here) Thomsons article was bit of a let down, while Traynors reply though plausible is something i have no experience in. Traynnor setting up and rebranding the media side of things for the club, not really PR but we're agreed it's not blog atleast. Thomson's article is a let down and Traynor's article is plausible? IMO you only think it plausible because you want it to be. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Thomson's article is a let down and Traynor's article is plausible? IMO you only think it plausible because you want it to be. You're deliberately twisting the context of what i said. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Liked this from Charles... Many players walked out on Rangers for personal gain. Naismith said I turned the Rangers fans against him – but if he loved Rangers so much he wouldn’t have left. These are players without honour and they will never be back at Rangers. Players like McGregor, Naismith, Whittaker and Lafferty are not welcome back. I take it kenny McDowell's not been briefed? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 You're deliberately twisting the context of what i said. Rubbish. I pretty much quoted you word for word. If you didn't mean that which I quoted then feel free to expand and set me straight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Charles... Tell us about this walkway you want to build infront of the main stand for families, like Wembley Way... It's a fly over, isn't it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 What exactly did Jim Traynor do to bring down Craig Whyte? Did he do paying the bills? Call in the administrator? Help with the sale to Charlie Green? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 No difference from putting articles on the records website really (i've left you an open goal here) Thomsons article was bit of a let down, while Traynors reply though plausible is something i have no experience in. Traynnor setting up and rebranding the media side of things for the club, not really PR but we're agreed it's not blog atleast. What is it that you don't have experience in, with regards to traynor's reply? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I love how he went from saying "he said I turned the Rangers fans against him" and then cements the point in the same sentence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Rubbish. I pretty much quoted you word for word. If you didn't mean that which I quoted then feel free to expand and set me straight. An earlier post which your replied to, so ofcourse you're at it. bennett, on 13 Feb 2013 - 18:55, said: A bit of a let down, i was hoping for something we could finally use which showed a clear connection between Whyte and Greena and co (see earlier post). Not some pish about Jim bloody Traynor. so yes Thomson blog was a let down, i was expecting more. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.