SheepAreRed Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 The silence from the SFA is deafening. "......Dave King will not be permitted by the SFA to be an official at the Ibrox Club..." This was only March last year. I demand a march to Hampden 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Rangers requested a fine. Obviously because they knew that they were never going to have to pay it. Yes the SFA always allows clubs to dictate what punishments they get...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Patriot~ Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 The P's and D's seem upset over the prospect of King coming back to Rangers to put his millions in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Dave King 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Dave King 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 The P's and D's seem upset over the prospect of King coming back to Rangers to put his millions in.Will he invest the 200 or so he has avoided giving to the RSA Treasury? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Wealth off the continent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Yes the SFA always allows clubs to dictate what punishments they get...... They do when it is Rangers. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23595820 Rangers' lawyer, in contrast, specifically asked for the club to be fined in respect of Charge 3, or Rule 14(g). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Millions 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 The P's and D's seem upset over the prospect of King coming back to Rangers to put his millions minions in. Fixed that for ye. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirdrockfromtheSon Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Best be careful, Normans got a PM gang Best be careful, Normans got a PM gang Best be careful, Normans got a PM gang And you don't? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 (edited) And you don't? Not really a gang when it's just one person using multiple names. Edited October 10, 2013 by aofjays 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 And you don't? I take it this hateful, bitterest of little bigots has a welcome amongst the plastics and diddies again. Perhaps it thinks people forget and he'll remind us what 'sort' of people he cannot stand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 And you don't? Nah, he/she/it/they've got some kind of MPD going on. Much classier. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Bennett always being educated about facts pertaining to his club ... Tedi and Bennett ... the imbecilic duo of P&B threads. I'm totally sure bennett questions what's going on at Rangers to the absolute best of his ability. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 I take it this hateful, bitterest of little bigots has a welcome amongst the plastics and diddies again. Perhaps it thinks people forget and he'll remind us what 'sort' of people he cannot stand. Be interesting to see if the WKR and chums, pal up with him again.... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 No other choice for me then. Catholic = plastic fan. I see no other option present. WKR - the tool of tools. The actual connection he was making - and I'm sure MT will clarify if I'm wrong - is that Bendarroch=inadequate. A connection I entirely agree with. HTH. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 I'm totally sure bennett questions what's going on at Rangers to the absolute best of his ability. And therein lies the root of his/her/its/their problem... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheepAreRed Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 No, I am not scared of him ploughing ahem millions into your vile club. Im awaiting 2 things from the SFA. 1. They confirm as they did last year that King is not allowed on the board due to his past association with the liquidated "dead" club. or 2. They confirm this is a New Club of which King has never been the Director of. Therefore, no issue, get yer 5 stars off your badge, take the "rangers then, rangers now" etc propoganda down from your stadium, re-start your history, apologise to Spencey, that's just for starters...... If neither of these happen then its a further illustration that our game is phucked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Never knew he wasn't welcome ... unlike you .. but then it just flies over your thick head tbf. Edit: Did you not try this pish before and fall flat on your ugly face? Something gives me the feeling it could all be about to happen again. In all honesty, a few of us have had issues with some of Third Rock's opinions - I don't see them as relevant here, and anyone offended could have easily complained at the time. No doubt that would have been seen as a waste of deflection and point-scoring material mm though. NB. For all you fragile wee berrz - I'd be careful before trying a repeat performance - your credibility isn't exactly at an all-time high as it is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.