Double Jack D Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 David Murray Craig Whyte Charles Green Dave King is the saviour, Ally and Walter said so! Do they never learn! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Something gives me the feeling it could all be about to happen again. In all honesty, a few of us have had issues with some of Third Rock's opinions - I don't see them as relevant here, and anyone offended could have easily complained at the time. No doubt that would have been seen as a waste of deflection and point-scoring material mm though. NB. For all you fragile wee berrz - I'd be careful before trying a repeat performance - your credibility isn't exactly at an all-time high as it is. Norman speak with forked tongue.... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Norman speak with forked tongue.... No, Bennett, I'm being serious here. The majority of posters see you and your wee mates as laughable morons. Of course, they're only going by... Oh yes, experience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Bennett always being educated about facts pertaining to his club ... Tedi and Bennett ... the imbecilic duo of P&B threads. Bit harsh, imo. I see them more like this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Nacho Novo signs for Greenock Morton, guide didn't last long then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 David Murray Craig Whyte Charles Green Dave King is the saviour, Ally and Walter said so! Do they never learn! Did not learn then, not learning now, will not learn in the future. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 The actual connection he was making - and I'm sure MT will clarify if I'm wrong - is that Bendarroch=inadequate. A connection I entirely agree with. HTH. Oh, an actual connection is it? And you agree? Well. Fancy that... Another day of pish and fabricated drivel from the WKR. © Dhensebhore. Lest we ever forget 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Never knew he wasn't welcome ... unlike you .. but then it just flies over your thick head tbf. Edit: Did you not try this pish before and fall flat on your ugly face? I'm not surprised at you offering support for this hate-filled bigot - suits you Dhensest. His self-declared hate would sit very comfortably with you. Isn't that right soldier bhoy? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 No, Bennett, I'm being serious here. The majority of posters see you and your wee mates as laughable morons. A handful of plastics and diddies? Are these, finally, the people who take you seriously? Is it, WKR, aye? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Be interesting to see if the WKR and chums, pal up with him again.... I'd expect it. And some fancy (empty and transparent) verbal gymnastics to explain why it's both acceptable and why everyone else has it wrong.... In all honesty, a few of us have had issues with some of Third Rock's opinions - I don't see them as relevant here, and anyone offended could have easily complained at the time. No doubt that would have been seen as a waste of deflection and point-scoring material mm though. NB. For all you fragile wee berrz - I'd be careful before trying a repeat performance - your credibility isn't exactly at an all-time high as it is. And the WKR - with alarming predictability - has the ball rolling for the benefit of ThirdrockfromtheSon. Quelle surprise! WKR doesn't see his hate as relevant here. Where is it relevant, WKR? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 A handful of plastics and diddies? Are these, finally, the people who take you seriously? Is it, WKR, aye? Again, your comprehension skills let you down. Do you have some kind of disability, or can I call you thick without being accused of some fúcking -ism or other? I said nothing about people taking me seriously. What I said is that the majority of posters see Bennett and his wee mates - of which I class you as one - as laughable morons. Thank you for reinforcing my original point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 I'd expect it. And some fancy (empty and transparent) verbal gymnastics to explain why it's both acceptable and why everyone else has it wrong.... And the WKR - with alarming predictability - has the ball rolling for the benefit of ThirdrockfromtheSon. Quelle surprise! WKR doesn't see his hate as relevant here. Where is it relevant, WKR? And Bendarroch - with alarming predictability - takes over an hour to get the Party Line and decide on the attack strategy. All yours, bigot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 And Bendarroch - with alarming predictability - takes over an hour to get the Party Line and decide on the attack strategy. All yours, bigot. WKR decides that Thirdrock will get more benefit by attacking another poster. WKR then, WKR now, WKR forever. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Let's be honest, the papers want this to happen because they want to splash "The King of Ibrox" across front and back pages. Probably with mock up crown and septre, too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Again, your comprehension skills let you down. I said nothing about people taking me seriously. Oh? Really? I'm doing my bit to keep what angles of the investigation I can up-front and centre. It's just that P&B isn't really the place, and WRK isn't the persona, to be doing that and expect to be taken seriously by those I'm in contact with. Did you forget all about your undercover multi-personae and those who do take you seriously? Well, one of you I presume. Which one is it? Whalloper. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 What's your view on this ... What's my view on a bunch of sad bhastards from the internets organising complaints and emails about Rangers again? Down with that sort of thing! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Come on .. answer the question .. you can do it if you try ... let's keep it simple. IF both the quotes are a true representation of the factual position ... is King a "fit and proper person" ... YES or NO? ... if YES explain why. IF the quotes are a true representation? You want me to speculate on your speculation? What IF the quotes are anything but a true representation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 WKR decides that Thirdrock will get more benefit by attacking another poster. WKR then, WKR now, WKR forever. Total wordsalad, yet still worthy of a greenie from the PolterFud. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted October 10, 2013 Share Posted October 10, 2013 Come on .. answer the question .. you can do it if you try ... let's keep it simple. IF both the quotes are a true representation of the factual position ... is King a "fit and proper person" ... YES or NO? ... if YES explain why. you do realise you'll never get a proper answer. more chance of getting 1 from a banana. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.