xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Also, as pointed out, Blair Jenkins is the top Yes campaign person. When will Darling debate him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeGas Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 ..and if Blair Jenkins challenged Obama, you'd expect debate to take place? A silly excuse PC,we all know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeGas Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 I'm the top person in my hotel room right now. Would Darling debate me if I challenged him? A silly excuse xbl,we all know that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 A silly excuse PC,we all know that. Why is it silly? It is the equivalent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 A silly excuse xbl,we all know that. Why? It is just as relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeGas Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 There would be much at stake for these two to go one on one on the box. Salmond could have much to gain,but he knows he could lose much too. Weighing it up he knows which way it is likely to go for him. Darling on weighing it up also sees there is much to gain or lose,but he realises he'll win this debate. Thus Darling challenged Salmond and Salmond is scared to take him on. Salmond knows 'his' Bannockburn,he understands that whenever possible you select the time and place of battle. Which is fair enough,but his tactics do not bode well for the Independent Scotland movement. I mean it's not even 'hit and run',it's just "run",anti English propaganda,create myth and the Brave Heart thing.. This challenge by Darling would be about currency,Europe,Military,passports,the Monarchy,how the rUK will go about talking to foreign Scotland and that will not be the way Salmond seems to think it will be etc. This. Edit,you can add mortgage rates,pensions,education,national debts,sport,you name it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeGas Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 This is a waste of time. Deegas is just a lazy thick troll. The Chair of the BT group challenges the main Independence man. Perfectly acceptable and normal. Salmond won't have it cause he'll get 'battered'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Davidson and Sarwar were bright enough to realise they were never going to be able compete with Galloway or Farage, not poor old Angus he was sucked in and blown out in bubbles, it was a car crash for him, but the SNP will know in future that good old Angus should only put up for photo ops. and not serious debate, Salmond next time will send out the Rottweiler (Sturgeon) least she may have held her own, anyway the look on Robertson face when Dimbleby gave him into trouble, priceless Alex Salmond will not appear on Question Time as he thinks its beneath him, he does like a cosy one-to-one from his front garden Unless you have not noticed I am a NO voter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perfect Circle Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Davidson and Sarwar were bright enough to realise they were never going to be able compete with Galloway or Farage, not poor old Angus he was sucked in and blown out in bubbles, it was a car crash for him, but the SNP will know in future that good old Angus should only put up for photo ops. and not serious debate, Salmond next time will send out the Rottweiler (Sturgeon) least she may have held her own, anyway the look on Robertson face when Dimbleby gave him into trouble, priceless Alex Salmond will not appear on Question Time as he thinks its beneath him, he does like a cosy one-to-one from his front garden Unless you have not noticed I am a NO voter Excellent. The platform is yours. Why do you thing Scotland is better governed by London. Make the case! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Davidson and Sarwar were bright enough to realise they were never going to be able compete with Galloway or Farage, not poor old Angus he was sucked in and blown out in bubbles, it was a car crash for him, but the SNP will know in future that good old Angus should only put up for photo ops. and not serious debate, Salmond next time will send out the Rottweiler (Sturgeon) least she may have held her own, anyway the look on Robertson face when Dimbleby gave him into trouble, priceless Alex Salmond will not appear on Question Time as he thinks its beneath him, he does like a cosy one-to-one from his front garden Unless you have not noticed I am a NO voter Did you notice that Dimbleby told lies? Apparently he claimed that QT never took account of by elections. This was a total and utter lie. He claimed it wasn't a show about independence, so why make it a youth audience, divide them 50/50 on independence, and bill it on the website as an independence special? Or are you pretty cool with Unionists telling lies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthAyrshireKillie Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Davidson and Sarwar were bright enough to realise they were never going to be able compete with Galloway or Farage, not poor old Angus he was sucked in and blown out in bubbles, it was a car crash for him, but the SNP will know in future that good old Angus should only put up for photo ops. and not serious debate, Salmond next time will send out the Rottweiler (Sturgeon) least she may have held her own, anyway the look on Robertson face when Dimbleby gave him into trouble, priceless Alex Salmond will not appear on Question Time as he thinks its beneath him, he does like a cosy one-to-one from his front garden Unless you have not noticed I am a NO voter such moronic drivel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JockMacAbre Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 No, because splitting up a 306 year old country, one that we are all accustomed to, is an extremely big thing.Yes, because it will mean that the people Scotland vote for will get in power every time.Yes, because we not be getting involved in ridiculous, bank-breaking, illegal wars.Yes, because we will not be spending tax money upholding an undemocratic House of Lords and monarchy.Yes, because it may force rUK into nuclear disarmament.Head says yes. Heart says no, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 No, because splitting up a 306 year old country, one that we are all accustomed to, is an extremely big thing. Yes, because it will mean that the people Scotland vote for will get in power every time. Yes, because we not be getting involved in ridiculous, bank-breaking, illegal wars. Yes, because we will not be spending tax money upholding an undemocratic House of Lords and monarchy. Yes, because it may force rUK into nuclear disarmament. Head says yes. Heart says no, however. Why the hell would the heart say no? Just because it is a "big thing"? Is your heart not capable of "big things"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JockMacAbre Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Did you notice that Dimbleby told lies? Apparently he claimed that QT never took account of by elections. This was a total and utter lie. He claimed it wasn't a show about independence, so why make it a youth audience, divide them 50/50 on independence, and bill it on the website as an independence special? Or are you pretty cool with Unionists telling lies? Getting pretty used to Unionists telling lies... Nats too. Seems to be the only way to get through the referendum process. Depressing as f**k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 No Dimbleby said they not take account of bi-elections, and on the split there was at least a couple of the audience said they were undecided Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Rider Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Davidson and Sarwar were bright enough to realise they were never going to be able compete with Galloway or Farage, not poor old Angus he was sucked in and blown out in bubbles, it was a car crash for him, but the SNP will know in future that good old Angus should only put up for photo ops. and not serious debate, Salmond next time will send out the Rottweiler (Sturgeon) least she may have held her own, anyway the look on Robertson face when Dimbleby gave him into trouble, priceless Alex Salmond will not appear on Question Time as he thinks its beneath him, he does like a cosy one-to-one from his front garden Unless you have not noticed I am a NO voter Are you ecto'ed oot yer nut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perfect Circle Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Why the hell would the heart say no? Just because it is a "big thing"? Is your heart not capable of "big things"? Think of the Olympics. There is absolutely no way London could have held the Olympics if Scotland was independent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JockMacAbre Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 Why the hell would the heart say no? Just because it is a "big thing"? Is your heart not capable of "big things"? No. It's a mouses heart. My other one packed in... Salty diet, y'know. Found a dead mouse, performed the surgery myself. What David Cameron has done to the NHS is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perfect Circle Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 No Dimbleby said they not take account of bi-elections, and on the split there was at least a couple of the audience said they were undecided Cool. Please make the case for a NO vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted June 15, 2013 Share Posted June 15, 2013 No Dimbleby said they not take account of bi-elections Indeed he did. And as I said, this was a complete and utter lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.