Jump to content

17 Year Old Dies from 'Mortal Kombat' Tablet


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 320
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Obviously I realise that some people and especially some young people will always be tempted to take drugs But how are you really going to try and educate people to not take drugs if we are then making sure the drugs they buy are safe . One minute we will be saying don't take them and the next saying yes these will be fine.

If the drugs are safe then there is no point in banning them in the first place, is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The public would be up in arms if the price of eccys was too low. It wouldn't play well with voters. It would seem a bit cavalier. After all these would still be recreational drugs.

True, part of the reason for high taxation,

If say your average dealer is currently selling at £10 a pill, (Ive no real idea of street price btw) you can produce it for a couple of pence, and it's at a very conservative 50p -£1 a pill for a shop to sell at, you can then have a tax rate of 1000% and your still undercutting a street dealer, or at least selling at the same price but with guarantee of purity.

The aim of legalisation isn't to drop the price, but so that the money users are spending is correctly used, along with reducing harm to a ridiculous degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The public would be up in arms if the price of eccys was too low. It wouldn't play well with voters. It would seem a bit cavalier. After all these would still be recreational drugs.

But wasn't your original argument that dealers would comfortably undercut legal drugs? I take it you have totally abandoned that in the face of overwhelming evidence.

FWIW, I actually don't think the public has any right to be "up in arms" about it. Ecstasy can be produced, and consumed, safely. If it is a recreational drug, so what? Since when did the general public get to dictate the individual choices of a consumer? If anything, ecstasy affects only the individual who takes it, unlike alcohol will contributes to thousands of violent incidents per year. Of course it should be taxed, and priced at a reasonable level which is dictated after considering the evidence and taking views from a variety of connected stakeholders.

If you're angry about people voluntarily consuming a product that doesn't harm anyone else, you should get a fucking life.

Of course people can still buy illegal drugs, legalisation doesn't change this, it just allows them to have a safe option. If you choose to buy heroin of a much lower quality, at a much higher price and ingest it in dangerous conditions then, congratulations, you are an idiot. This would be a significant minority, as is the case with illegal booze and fags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What good is regulating drugs going to do?

People saying regulating and taxing drugs will help. Get real for one minute people with heart conditions they don't know about are gonna take them and end up in a bad way legal or not. Being available in shops are only going to put more people at risk.

So don't produce a clean product because someone might have an unknown heart condition. See what Britain's secret heart condition suffering ravers need is to buy it off some jakey who's coloured it with Cillit Bang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In our late teens we used to flirt E or "nummars" as they were known most weekends.

Stories of deaths in the papers kicking about then would make you kind of worried until you actually read them. We would use E to put a nice buzz onto your night. The dead one would almost inevitably have gobbled 10-15 pills on the night of their death. Hell mend them. Excess anything is dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the drugs are safe then there is no point in banning them in the first place, is there?

you are aware some banned substances are less harmful to you than tobacco and alcohol??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, part of the reason for high taxation,

If say your average dealer is currently selling at £10 a pill, (Ive no real idea of street price btw) you can produce it for a couple of pence, and it's at a very conservative 50p -£1 a pill for a shop to sell at, you can then have a tax rate of 1000% and your still undercutting a street dealer, or at least selling at the same price but with guarantee of purity.

The aim of legalisation isn't to drop the price, but so that the money users are spending is correctly used, along with reducing harm to a ridiculous degree.

|All sound arguments, imo you should also mention that keeping drugs illegal simply enriches criminal filth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the appeal of taking drugs, despite regularly consuming alcohol, but there's no real argument against legalising drugs or at the very least, establishing legislation to make drugs safer. Winning "the war on drugs" (to quote Carver from The Wire, "you can't even think of calling this shit a war.... wars end") and creating a drug free environment is an unachievable objective, the state doesn't have to be "the dealer" but it should put in place the mechanisms to protect its citizens from harmful drugs by embracing the problem and ensuring drugs are kept clean and people can take drugs safely (heroin clinics have worked successfully in Denmark, Switzerland and the Netherlands).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...