Lex Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 You'd think after ' Free by 93 ' and all the tub thumping we are going to win rhetoric last summer, the nats would learn. It would seem not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 The fact there is no genuine increase in secession polling must be quite alarming for the 'its just round the corner.. Tick tock' Nat moron types. Are there many of them? I'll start to get worried if we're not ahead once a significant dent has been put in the 'empire generation' demographic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 You'd think after ' Free by 93 ' and all the tub thumping we are going to win rhetoric last summer, the nats would learn. It would seem not Top be fair, unlike most unionists, we weren't all just reaching retirement age in 1993. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 You'd think after ' Free by 93 ' and all the tub thumping we are going to win rhetoric last summer, the nats would learn. It would seem not Fraid not Lexington. We'll keep going until we get independence. Hashtag unlucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Alec Gilroy is Reynard. Will take my tenner in the mail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lex Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Fraid not Lexington. We'll keep going until we get independence. Hashtag unlucks. I wouldn't expect otherwise. Nationalism has always been around in Scotland and always will be. It was the continual predictions of looming independence I was referring to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Alec Gilroy is Reynard. Will take my tenner in the mail. He's not Reynard. He's not used the word "leftard", "buckled" or "c**t" yet. Or this - My money's on one of the dribbling Dundee or Accies unionists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 He's not Reynard. He's not used the word "leftard", "buckled" or "c**t" yet. Or this - My money's on one of the dribbling Dundee or Accies unionists. He already seems a little more intelligent than the likes of Kevthedee, Pete's frontier and I am Rodger H_B isnt banned so probably wouldn't be posting as an alias I'm 99% sure it's Reynard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 He already seems a little more intelligent than the likes of Kevthedee, Pete's frontier and I am Rodger H_B isnt banned so probably wouldn't be posting as an alias I'm 99% sure it's Reynard He can spell - but he's certainly not intelligent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland B Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I'm genuinely new to posting on here. Although I've popped on and off to read, esp during the ref & GE. I looked at so many political forums and found this to be the best- I don't necessarily think it's equally stacked, as the unionists seem to be in the minority, but yet they seem to be prominent in their stupidity! @kevthedee. I would like to think that if anyone comes up with a good argument against Indy, I will listen. Yet to hear one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I'm genuinely new to posting on here. Although I've popped on and off to read, esp during the ref & GE. I looked at so many political forums and found this to be the best- I don't necessarily think it's equally stacked, as the unionists seem to be in the minority, but yet they seem to be prominent in their stupidity! @kevthedee. I would like to think that if anyone comes up with a good argument against Indy, I will listen. Yet to hear one. SNPbad seems to be a favourite reason amongst the puddle drinkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted July 31, 2015 Author Share Posted July 31, 2015 Alec Gilroy is Reynard. Will take my tenner in the mail. Wot bout that Clarkston5 spanner.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Wot bout that Clarkston5 spanner.? Aye, it's more likely to be him, I'd say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I'm genuinely new to posting on here. Although I've popped on and off to read, esp during the ref & GE. I looked at so many political forums and found this to be the best- I don't necessarily think it's equally stacked, as the unionists seem to be in the minority, but yet they seem to be prominent in their stupidity! @kevthedee. I would like to think that if anyone comes up with a good argument against Indy, I will listen. Yet to hear one. And now that you've joined, it's all come bubbling out. 28 posts in 3 hours - I'm impressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Are there many of them? I'll start to get worried if we're not ahead once a significant dent has been put in the 'empire generation' demographic. Don't know. I don't really know any idiot Nat types. The smart ones look to 15 years down the line.. Not 15 months. Even then who knows what the political landscape will be then? All you can conclusively say is that Yes were convincingly defeated less than a year ago. I expect to see another referendum in the next 30 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Don't know. I don't really know any idiot Nat types. The smart ones look to 15 years down the line.. Not 15 months. Even then who knows what the political landscape will be then? All you can conclusively say is that Yes were convincingly defeated less than a year ago. I expect to see another referendum in the next 30 years. "Convincingly" is a subjective term which means whatever you want it to mean. I would say the result was somewhere between close and convincing. It was wide enough that we know something significant has to change to win the next one but close enough that it won't take something too big. A swing of 6% will do it. Hardly Earth-shattering stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland B Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Dont know who Alec G is?????? But I'm guessing you have previous and have been banned before? Anyone who thinks I'm an alias PM me and I will happily explain my existence on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 A swing of 6% will do it. Hardly Earth-shattering stuff. Would 3% not do it? Statistics hurts my brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Surely anyone with a day old account who starts posting in the politics forum is an alias? Not my logic of course but a certain Baxter Parp. Baxter Parp is the thickest person on the site* so I would advise taking anything he says with a pinch of salt * well except Oaksoft, but it's a close run thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Accounts that have just started and are already trolling the politics forum should be banned no questions asked imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.