Guest superward Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 (edited) Covid protocols no longer mandatory according to the SFA update today. So you'd think that the red zones will be scrapped and revert to full allocation now. Edited October 5, 2021 by superward 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 Why bother reducing it? Seems petty if it's not needed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest superward Posted October 5, 2021 Share Posted October 5, 2021 (edited) The club had to reduce away capacities in the south stand due to the red zone stuff. They don't need to any more so I'm guessing the full stand will be reinstated as available. Edited October 5, 2021 by superward 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antiochas III Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 Callum Slattery 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0Neils40yarder Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 17 hours ago, ZX1886 said: Only that it’s been reduced. Sections to the left of the south stand (lower/upper) are shut due to the stairway being used by the players as far as I’m aware. Think the away allocation will be slightly bigger than what Rangers got in the play-offs. Is funny reading Celtic fans complaining about not being able to get a ticket. Where are you reading about their complaints? I'd love to have a gander at that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_oats Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 51 minutes ago, Antiochas III said: Callum Slattery If he keeps doing that and adds more of this then his 3 year deal is some bit of business. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisGRAEME Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 17 hours ago, Busta Nut said: Why bother reducing it? Funny. 17 hours ago, Busta Nut said: Seems petty if it's not needed. Correct. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
well fan for life Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 It seems to be that reducing allocation would be a very snide thing to do now there are no regulations that say we need a red zone. For that reason I am completely on board with giving them f**k all. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillips455 Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 Just wondering if tickets will be avilable for the Dundee United away game? I've been to 3 away games this season.... and we lost all 3 (2-0 airdrie, 1-0 Dundee and 2-0 hearts). I really hopping to watch an away win for once after my last one (the 3-2 against hearts with that seedorf strike). I assume there shouldn't be any issues as the red zones have since been relaxed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazylegsjoe_mfc Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 4 hours ago, capt_oats said: I'm watching that trying to work out why Watt slide tackles the ball into the net to get tackled by SOD 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_oats Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 I know xG isn't for everyone, I normally give it a swerve as well but our placement on this plot graph is...interesting? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, capt_oats said: I know xG isn't for everyone, I normally give it a swerve as well but our placement on this plot graph is...interesting? Aye that's not for me. All that said to me was Motherwell scored a lot of their attempted shots. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_oats Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 (edited) 24 minutes ago, Busta Nut said: Aye that's not for me. All that said to me was Motherwell scored a lot of their attempted shots. Ha! I just read your Tweet reply to Jay not long after I posted that. Nah, what interested me was the fact that we're way closer to the "Higher Quality chances created" side of things along with somewhere in the middle of higher/lower quality chances faced. I wouldn't 100% hang my hat on it but it kind of speaks to what we're doing in terms of creating chances and also defensively (despite us seeming to give up a lot of shots on goal). Edited October 6, 2021 by capt_oats 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 35 minutes ago, capt_oats said: Ha! I just read your Tweet reply to Jay not long after I posted that. Nah, what interested me was the fact that we're way closer to the "Higher Quality chances created" side of things along with somewhere in the middle of higher/lower quality chances faced. I wouldn't 100% hang my hat on it but it kind of speaks to what we're doing in terms of creating chances and also defensively (despite us seeming to give up a lot of shots on goal). It'll be because you don't have morons like Shaun Rooney shooting from 40 yards every week, and probably have less headed chances too. One weakness of "xG per shot" is a couple of "bad" shooting decisions drag the average down. Teams below you on that chart could be creating far more better chances, they're just mixing it with low xG chances too. Probably should be looking at the amount of chances over, say, 0.25xG instead, but that's a lot of work until you learn how to scrape FotMob. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capt_oats Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 2 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said: It'll be because you don't have morons like Shaun Rooney shooting from 40 yards every week, and probably have less headed chances too. One weakness of "xG per shot" is a couple of "bad" shooting decisions drag the average down. Teams below you on that chart could be creating far more better chances, they're just mixing it with low xG chances too. Probably should be looking at the amount of chances over, say, 0.25xG instead, but that's a lot of work until you learn how to scrape FotMob. That sounds entirely feasible. Where it's interesting in our case is that we're one of the teams with lower shots numbers which suggests that we're more focused on creating higher quality chances rather than, as you say, just having digs at goal from wherever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kapowzer Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 The bold Callum Slattery ha just shown up on Married at First Sight Australia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, capt_oats said: That sounds entirely feasible. Where it's interesting in our case is that we're one of the teams with lower shots numbers which suggests that we're more focused on creating higher quality chances rather than, as you say, just having digs at goal from wherever. FWIW 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YassinMoutaouakil Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 Still reckon we can get these possession/shot stats down a wee bit more. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropy Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 1 hour ago, YassinMoutaouakil said: Still reckon we can get these possession/shot stats down a wee bit more. Is that why we always toss the ball back to the opposition from a throw in? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.