thepundit Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Thought Broadfoot may have been given a retrospective red card if anything more was going to come from that incident. He's clearly stepping on Jacks feet multiple times to wind him up. Jack's response was well worthy of red card however, in my opinion. Why does Jack even get involved?. You're winning 1-0 in the 90th minute or whatever it was and Jack's allowed the player who conceded the penalty to get him sent off. Ability-wise he's done well so far but that sending off really made me question whether he has what it takes to play for Rangers. Anyway's, it contributed to Caixinha leaving Rangers so I'm happy. Partick Thistle and Hamilton in the next 2 games so Murty has a great chance at the elusive 3 wins in a row. Dundee after that and they're bottom of the league so..... 4 wins?... Nah, too good to be true. Aberdeen at Ibrox after that. McInnes to get the win. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 2, 2017 Author Share Posted November 2, 2017 32 minutes ago, thepundit said: Thought Broadfoot may have been given a retrospective red card if anything more was going to come from that incident. He's clearly stepping on Jacks feet multiple times to wind him up. Jack's response was well worthy of red card however, in my opinion. Jack's been pretty decent since he joined us but is clearly as thick as pig-shit. Imagine being outwitted by Kirk Broadfoot. True "egg on yer face" stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Grangemouth Bairn said: Every time the Compliance Officer's overturn a red card for Jack they just make it look like referees have it in for him. Referees will be scared to send him off again. A crazy, crazy system. It was the sfa disciplinary tribunal made up of Walter Smith, Gordon Smith and Chick Young who rescinded Jack's unjust red card. 1 hour ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: On the contrary. The more time Sevco players are sent off, drop points then get the card rescinded the better. It's hilarious. See when we eventually get a dodgy decision in oor favour..... -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grangemouth Bairn Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 7 minutes ago, bennett said: It was the sfa disciplinary tribunal made up of Walter Smith, Gordon Smith and Chick Young who rescinded Jack's unjust red card. See when we eventually get a dodgy decision in oor favour..... Appreciate you clarifying matters for me. Thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybhoy Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 Magee has discovered Photoshop, fun times ahead. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flybhoy Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 1 hour ago, bennett said: Magee has discovered Photoshop, fun times ahead. Would have went had it been a munchy box. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 10 hours ago, thepundit said: Thought Broadfoot may have been given a retrospective red card if anything more was going to come from that incident. He's clearly stepping on Jacks feet multiple times to wind him up. Jack's response was well worthy of red card however, in my opinion. Why does Jack even get involved?. You're winning 1-0 in the 90th minute or whatever it was and Jack's allowed the player who conceded the penalty to get him sent off. Ability-wise he's done well so far but that sending off really made me question whether he has what it takes to play for Rangers. Anyway's, it contributed to Caixinha leaving Rangers so I'm happy. Partick Thistle and Hamilton in the next 2 games so Murty has a great chance at the elusive 3 wins in a row. Dundee after that and they're bottom of the league so..... 4 wins?... Nah, too good to be true. Aberdeen at Ibrox after that. McInnes to get the win. On the contrary. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 What exactly does it take to play for Rangers? He seemingly had what it took to play for Aberdeen, who are better than Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dafcburty Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 As a Scotland fan, it is great to see Ross McCrorie break through and do so well in your first-team. I conducted an interview last week with his brother, Robby, and he is also doing well, albeit it at a lower level; https://jordanburtfootball.com/2017/11/10/exposure-in-league-two-benefits-mccrorie-after-scotland-under-21-recall/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyreidloyal Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 As a Scotland fan, it is great to see Ross McCrorie break through and do so well in your first-team. I conducted an interview last week with his brother, Robby, and he is also doing well, albeit it at a lower level;https://jordanburtfootball.com/2017/11/10/exposure-in-league-two-benefits-mccrorie-after-scotland-under-21-recall/ Anyone heading to Berwick Wednesday for Big Steve Notmans testimonial?! McRorie should play a part 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 On 03/11/2017 at 12:14, nsr said: What exactly does it take to play for Rangers? He seemingly had what it took to play for Aberdeen, who are better than Rangers. Aberdeen are better than Rangers. (at the moment) Doesn't mean Rangers don't need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Fairly obvious, actually. Aberdeen don't have the quality to achieve it. Rangers should have. That's the difference. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, thepundit said: Aberdeen are better than Rangers. (at the moment) Doesn't mean Rangers don't need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Fairly obvious, actually. Aberdeen don't have the quality to achieve it. Rangers should have. That's the difference. Motherwell would need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Doesn't meant we can start demanding that we deserve them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 1 hour ago, nsr said: Motherwell would need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Doesn't meant we can start demanding that we deserve them. You'd need better players than Celtic. And you can demand them all you want. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Aberdeen are better than Rangers. (at the moment) Doesn't mean Rangers don't need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Fairly obvious, actually. Aberdeen don't have the quality to achieve it. Rangers should have. That's the difference. Why should you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Aberdeen are better than Rangers. (at the moment) Doesn't mean Rangers don't need better players than Aberdeen to win the league. Fairly obvious, actually. Aberdeen don't have the quality to achieve it. Rangers should have. That's the difference. You poor man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Why should Rangers* have the quality to win the league? Celtic have more than 3 times their turnover and more importantly, run in a financially prudent manner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 Why should you? Because that's why he chose to support them.He didn't want to support a 'diddy' side. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 This club calling itself Rangers has never been better than Aberdeen at any point in history. Why should they expect to be? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 11 hours ago, mjw said: Because that's why he chose to support them. He didn't want to support a 'diddy' side. Staunch as ever excellent MJW but it's not to call them diddy sides too often mate. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.