Jump to content

Abandon Hampden say SPFL Chairman


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, They think its all over said:

Def' New stadium and centre of excellence to try and push this countries national game where it should be.

With the complex having an educational centre for upcoming youth players to attend, and all budding youth players taken out of demoralising 'club' systems and coached by a Scottish coaching system for the national interests in the game and not for individual club gain. With youth players reaching a level of of excellence before being drafted to club system at an age suitable for them to deal with the pro stage.

And wait for it............... built in central Scotland. No not the central belt. Stirling/Perthshire. Unlike the Scottish Sport Centre at Inverclyde, which is closer to Ireland than most of Scotland!!!

Why, of course.

I've no idea why they've not just done this already.  Do you think they could put in a cable car between the stadium and my house?  I'd find that really handy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 hours ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said:

100k capacity stadium in Auchterarder with a direct Monorail/vacuum tube link from every town in Scotland. An international airport, spaceport and a Bella Italia to also be built alongside the stadium.

Only if the mighty Auchterarder Primrose get to groundshare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎28‎/‎03‎/‎2017 at 21:59, K77 said:

The 2nd photo is a good indication of just how much Hampden has been reduced over the years. As I understand it the old seated top tier of the north stand required to be upgraded to meet the current building regulations but it would have cost more to upgrade the existing stand than to demolish it and build a new one. So they simply demolished it.

Not too sure why the old terrace underneath was abandoned. I remember the first time I stood there in the 80's as a kid and being baffled by the vast area behind the access/exit portals. It just seemed such a waste.

Also I have never heard a reason for removing the top section of the east terrace at the same time.

As mentioned the current Hampden is pretty much a reclad of the existing earth banks from the original construction ~100 years ago, plus new roof. Earth banks were pretty much the stadium state of the art back then but redundant for the most part today.

While it is feasible to square off the ends this would require a complete demolition of the east and west stands. Demolition alone would be expensive as you would have to deconstruct the existing roof in a manner that does not affect the existing north and south stands. Following that you need to remove the earth banks and that is where a lot of money may be required that may not be obvious to all. Removal of material to landfill is subject to a tax, and the threshold on what is classed as hazardous material is pretty low these days. Even 'non-hazardous waste' can still generate eye watering costs dependent on volumes.

Given the date of construction of the earth banks plus the abundance of heavy industry in the area at the time (where the surplus material may have came from) there is potential that the earth banks contain some particularly nasty contaminants. Together with the volumes involved it could be several million just the clear the site even before the new stands build cost. At a rough guess, I doubt there would be much change out of £50million to build two square stands to maintain a similar overall capacity.

Slight additional problem that the existing north and south stands are tapered to tie into the curve of the east and west bowls. In order to maximise capacity and sight lines would probably require a remodification of the end blocks in line with each goal line. That alone would be several million.

With regard to the earth banks, firstly some must have been removed for the top section of the East terrace in the 80's and that would give an indication of what is under the terraces as they stand just now.

However some of the stadium is a natural bowl according to this historic Queens Park website http://www.qpfc.com/hampden/hampden04.htm

"The land itself was in a natural bowl shape before Queen's bought it, and this assisted the structure of the terracing of the ground, which unusually was built on solid ground, rather than on wooden or metal supports as was common at most football grounds at the time. The bowl also meant that the playing area was 33 feet below Somerville Drive."

The proposed squared off ends probably would not have many facilities requiring a lot of space so it may even be possible to build them with the remaining terrace in place as they have done at Leipzig

zentralstadion2.jpg

The North stand should be closer to the South stand but the costs for moving it a few metres probably mean it remains as it is but both ends could be converted into large single tier structures with a relatively steep rake to enhance the viewing from behind the goal. With the nature of the game here we need to keep both ends the same otherwise one side will say they have an advantage or a better facility.

The South stand could come around the corner slightly and the second tier then stop above the rising squared off end.

However the roof may be the biggest cost issue, as you state its all connected and I don't know the effect of removing the ends on this structure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, realmadrid said:

With regard to the earth banks, firstly some must have been removed for the top section of the East terrace in the 80's and that would give an indication of what is under the terraces as they stand just now.

However some of the stadium is a natural bowl according to this historic Queens Park website http://www.qpfc.com/hampden/hampden04.htm

"The land itself was in a natural bowl shape before Queen's bought it, and this assisted the structure of the terracing of the ground, which unusually was built on solid ground, rather than on wooden or metal supports as was common at most football grounds at the time. The bowl also meant that the playing area was 33 feet below Somerville Drive."

The proposed squared off ends probably would not have many facilities requiring a lot of space so it may even be possible to build them with the remaining terrace in place as they have done at Leipzig

zentralstadion2.jpg

The North stand should be closer to the South stand but the costs for moving it a few metres probably mean it remains as it is but both ends could be converted into large single tier structures with a relatively steep rake to enhance the viewing from behind the goal. With the nature of the game here we need to keep both ends the same otherwise one side will say they have an advantage or a better facility.

The South stand could come around the corner slightly and the second tier then stop above the rising squared off end.

However the roof may be the biggest cost issue, as you state its all connected and I don't know the effect of removing the ends on this structure.  

That is very, very cool. Why are the German so good at this stuff while we persist in being short sighted, unimaginative shitebags?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Def' New stadium and centre of excellence to try and push this countries national game where it should be.
With the complex having an educational centre for upcoming youth players to attend, and all budding youth players taken out of demoralising 'club' systems and coached by a Scottish coaching system for the national interests in the game and not for individual club gain. With youth players reaching a level of of excellence before being drafted to club system at an age suitable for them to deal with the pro stage.
And wait for it............... built in central Scotland. No not the central belt. Stirling/Perthshire. Unlike the Scottish Sport Centre at Inverclyde, which is closer to Ireland than most of Scotland!!!




Why would the new central academy need to be next to the national stadium?

And are you suggesting that young talent should be commuting to Perthshire, or are they staying on site in some kind of footballing Hogwarts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Malcolm Malcolm said:

That is very, very cool. Why are the German so good at this stuff while we persist in being short sighted, unimaginative shitebags?

Leipzig is a weird one.

The old ground was the East German National Stadium. And home to Lokomotiv Leipzig who were a big club under communism but failed to survive in the new germany.

They also have the distinction of being eliminated from Europe by Hearts, Hibs and Kilmarnock 

The City council inherited the massive concrete bowl and handled the rebuilding project but for a long time the city didn't actually have a serious football club to fill it 
Sachen Leipzig played 4th tier football there  for a few years after it reopened in 2004

It was only after a decade that Red Bull stuck their money behind a Leipzig club and propelled them from regional football in 2012-13 to 2nd in the Bundesliga today

From being less than half full in 2014 RB Leipzig are now pretty much filling the ground.

Sachen Leipzig who had previously turned down Red Bull have vanished

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Leipzig is a weird one.

The old ground was the East German National Stadium. And home to Lokomotiv Leipzig who were a big club under communism but failed to survive in the new germany.

They also have the distinction of being eliminated from Europe by Hearts, Hibs and Kilmarnock 

The City council inherited the massive concrete bowl and handled the rebuilding project but for a long time the city didn't actually have a serious football club to fill it 
Sachen Leipzig played 4th tier football there  for a few years after it reopened in 2004

It was only after a decade that Red Bull stuck their money behind a Leipzig club and propelled them from regional football in 2012-13 to 2nd in the Bundesliga today

From being less than half full in 2014 RB Leipzig are now pretty much filling the ground.

Sachen Leipzig who had previously turned down Red Bull have vanished

 

Good for Sachen, I say.

A bit of pride.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they extended the upper tear around the whole stadium it would look a lot better. Transport is fine, I don't know why people moan so much about it. I wouldn't care if we got tuffed out of hampden though in the future.


Transport is fine if you live in Glasgow. At the league cup final there were Dons buses waiting to leave that were still in view on Hampden an hour after full time due to the traffic (even though several fans left long before the final whistle. This was 5pm on a Sunday as well, hardly peak time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:

According to the Ordnance Survey, the centre of mainland Scotland is 5km East of Schiehallion at NN7673153751 (56°39′33.86″N 4°0′40.37″W)

Therefore this is where any new national stadium should be built.

So, on top of all the other obstacles, we've also got a mountain to climb?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ross. said:

So, on top of all the other obstacles, we've also got a mountain to climb?

It will certainly be rather hilly. Google Maps certainly show that it would be a somewhat challenging location for the construction crews.

 

ns.thumb.jpg.9ead9b6bd9cb805193ee18564758ea71.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...