Jump to content

The normalisation of the far-right continues


Guest Bob Mahelp

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Neither life saving vaccines nor abortions are compulsory, the big difference is the US are trying to make abortions illegal, even for 10 year old raped children. "Mo boady ma choice" doesn't make any sense where vaccines and abortions are voluntary options.

I think it’s unfair to say the US are trying to make abortions illegal.  All that’s happened is it’s been brought back to the States, adhering to the constitution and allowing democracy to actually take place.

I don’t think he was saying either abortions or vaccines are compulsory though, but just exposing the double standards regarding ‘ma boady ma choice!’

Many only apply the above erroneous phrase to one of these situations.

Edited by Duries Air Freshener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

I think it’s unfair to say the US are trying to make abortions illegal.  All that’s happened is it’s been brought back to the States, allowing democracy to actually take place.

I don’t think he was saying either abortions or vaccines are compulsory though, but just exposing the double standards regarding ‘ma boady ma choice!’

Many only apply the above erroneous phrase to one of these situations.

I don't think you actually believe a word you spout on here, including being a fan of Bernard Manning and Lawrence Fox, if you are you're a shite advocate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ervin H Burrell said:

Fox is absolutely determined to outdo Musk in the battle for world's most divorced man.

If Billie Piper propositioned you, you'd likely have to KB her given her track record and what it might say about you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said:


Feel free to answer my points, if you actually have an argument.

You haven't made any points, apart from approving a tweet that makes zero sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

Incorrect.

Instead of answering my points, you started spouting stuff about Bernard Manning.

I can't tell you how to post, but ignoring points with attempts at deflection is not a good look.

You haven't made a point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Snafu said:

He's correct you haven't made any points, Fox made the point not you, you just agreed with him. What were the other points, I don't see them unless your name is Lawrence Fox, Lawrence?

The unanswered points are in the post directly before Welshy's Bernard Manning segway.

Edited by Duries Air Freshener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lawrence Fox is bankrolled by Jeremy Hosking, a rabid Brexiteer, long time Tory donor, Farage fanatic, investor in fossil fuels etc etc (standard check box exercise). Let's not pretend that Fox is some kind of unshackled free thinker.
Utterly unsurprising that useful idiots like Stormzy are being played like an absolute fiddle by these twerps, if any of this is even in good faith (spoiler: it's not).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

I think it’s unfair to say the US are trying to make abortions illegal.  All that’s happened is it’s been brought back to the States, adhering to the constitution and allowing democracy to actually take place.

I don’t think he was saying either abortions or vaccines are compulsory though, but just exposing the double standards regarding ‘ma boady ma choice!’

Many only apply the above erroneous phrase to one of these situations.

Ok, i'll play, even though i should know better. 

It is fair to say that the US is trying to make abortions illegal, although that contention needs qualified by adding "in states where there's a majority of book burning creationist nutters". 

You would be "exposing a  double standard*" if there was a double standard. Very few people that favour vaccines dispute that they should be voluntary. Pro-choice campaigners generally do not spread made up shit of facebook about 5g or nanobots being a consequence of pregnancy. I find the atrempt to draw a false equivalence here quite distasteful to be honest. 

 

*bonus troll points for self important pomposity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jeff Venom said:

Lawrence Fox is bankrolled by Jeremy Hosking, a rabid Brexiteer, long time Tory donor, Farage fanatic, investor in fossil fuels etc etc (standard check box exercise). Let's not pretend that Fox is some kind of unshackled free thinker.
Utterly unsurprising that useful idiots like Stormzy are being played like an absolute fiddle by these twerps, if any of this is even in good faith (spoiler: it's not).

Grifters going to grift. He's this guy with a posh family.

images.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, coprolite said:

Ok, i'll play, even though i should know better. 

It is fair to say that the US is trying to make abortions illegal, although that contention needs qualified by adding "in states where there's a majority of book burning creationist nutters". 

You would be "exposing a  double standard*" if there was a double standard. Very few people that favour vaccines dispute that they should be voluntary. Pro-choice campaigners generally do not spread made up shit of facebook about 5g or nanobots being a consequence of pregnancy. I find the atrempt to draw a false equivalence here quite distasteful to be honest. 

 

*bonus troll points for self important pomposity. 

Play?  This isn’t a game, but a good faith discussion.  Well, it is at my end anyway, but I can’t say the same for Welshy.

The US isn’t trying to make abortions illegal (unfortunately) - only some of the States are.

Ill ignore your ignorant remarks about book burning creationist nutters, 5G and nanobots.  Perhaps these was all part of your game-playing.  They certainly aren’t constructive anyway.

There is indeed a double standard.  People say a woman should always get to decide what happens to their body in terms of abortion (even though there’s 2 bodies) yet the same people don’t say the same when it comes to vaccines.

This is what I believe Foxy was getting at.

It really is that simple.

Edited by Duries Air Freshener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, coprolite said:

Ok, i'll play, even though i should know better. 

It is fair to say that the US is trying to make abortions illegal, although that contention needs qualified by adding "in states where there's a majority of book burning creationist nutters". 

You would be "exposing a  double standard*" if there was a double standard. Very few people that favour vaccines dispute that they should be voluntary. Pro-choice campaigners generally do not spread made up shit of facebook about 5g or nanobots being a consequence of pregnancy. I find the atrempt to draw a false equivalence here quite distasteful to be honest. 

 

*bonus troll points for self important pomposity. 

This is of course, correct.

Creationists have got a foot in the door. They've already started with their prayers in schools nonsense.

They've been trying to get intelligent design taught in science classes for decades. So far it's been pushed back because there's absolutely zero empirical evidence for it.

Unfortunately the momentum and money lies with the creationists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

Play?  This isn’t a game, but a good faith discussion.  Well, it is at my end anyway, but I can’t say the same for Welshy.

The US isn’t trying to make abortions illegal (unfortunately) - only some of the States are.

Ill ignore your ignorant remarks about book burning creationist nutters, 5G and nanobots.  Perhaps these was all part of your game-playing.  They certainly aren’t constructive anyway.

There is indeed a double standard.  People say a woman should always get to decide what happens to their body in terms of abortion (even though there’s 2 bodies) yet the same people don’t say the same when it comes to vaccines.

This is what I believe Foxy was getting at.

It really is that simple.

My remarks are highly informed and not ignorant. I'll thank you not to ignore them. 

Sorry i called you a nutter. Not all book burning creationist anti vaxxers are nutters. Many are just really stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...