The OP Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Ever notice how Americans require a building which has been hit by a plane to collapse before they’re willing to invade a random Middle Eastern country? They obviously flew a plane into a building then snuck in and wired up explosives to ensure the invasion requirements were met. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: Of all the 9/11 truther bullshit, anyone who uses the word "aluminium" is unquestionably the worst of the lot. I just don't get how you be that gullible/wilfully idiotic/paranoid to even consider that as an angle. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Ever notice how you can’t claim on an insurance policy or destroy documents when a 110 storey building which is on fire collapses onto your own building so you need to blow up your own building thereafter? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, The OP said: Ever notice how you can’t claim on an insurance policy or destroy documents when a 110 storey building which is on fire collapses onto your own building so you need to blow up your own building thereafter? Happened to the the other week. A right pain. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Melanius Mullarkey said: Happened to the the other week. A right pain. Decent band, liked this album. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said: Thank you for explaining why you think an aeroplane filled with fuel travelling at several hundred miles per hour couldn't possibly destroy a building. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David W Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 20 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: Of all the 9/11 truther bullshit, anyone who uses the word "aluminium" is unquestionably the worst of the lot. I just don't get how you be that gullible/wilfully idiotic/paranoid to even consider that as an angle. It was in America, it would've been aluminum. Or bouncy metal as it's better known. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Miguel Sanchez said: Thank you for explaining why you think an aeroplane filled with fuel travelling at several hundred miles per hour couldn't possibly destroy a building. Do you seriously believe this? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said: Do you seriously believe this? I asked you first. What do you think would happen if a plane was deliberately flown into a building? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, Miguel Sanchez said: I asked you first. What do you think would happen if a plane was deliberately flown into a building? The plane would disintegrate on impact, it certainly wouldn't cut through steel beams. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 12 minutes ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said: Decent band, liked this album. Only because Johnny Marr did guitar (that rhymes and you know it ryhmes, admit it), I bet. So transparent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 During the September 11th attacks, four teams of al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four different jetliners. Two of these jetliners, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175, both Boeing 767's, were hijacked after takeoff from Boston's Logan International Airport. In its final moments, American Airlines Flight 11 flew south over Manhattan and crashed at roughly 440 miles per hour (710 km/h) into the north facade of the North Tower (WTC 1)) at 8:46 am, impacting between the 93rd and 99th floors. Seventeen minutes later, United Airlines Flight 175 approached from the southwest, over New York Harbor, and crashed into the south facade of the South Tower (WTC 2) at 9:03 am between the 77th and 85th floors at 540 miles per hour (870 km/h).[5] In addition to severing numerous load-bearing columns on the perimeter and inflicting other structural damage, the resulting fires in each tower ignited 10,000 US gallons (38,000 L) of jet fuel, which in turn ignited office combustibles. According to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) estimates, Flight 11 was carrying 10,000 US gallons (38,000 L) of jet fuel when it hit the North Tower. 1,500 US gallons (5,700 L) were consumed in the initial impact when the aircraft hit and a similar amount was consumed in the fireball outside the building. Approximately 7,000 US gallons (26,000 L) burnt inside the office spaces igniting combustibles. Similarly, Flight 175 was carrying around 9,100 US gallons (34,000 L) when it hit the South Tower. Up to 1,500 US gallons (5,700 L) was instantly consumed in the initial fireball and up to 2,275 US gallons (8,610 L) was consumed in the fireball outside the building. More than 5,325 US gallons (20,160 L) was burnt in the office spaces. NIST estimated that each floor of both buildings contained around four pounds per square foot (60 tons per floor) of combustibles.[18] Jet fuel from the impact traveled down at least one elevator shaft and exploded on the 78th floor of the North Tower, as well as in the main lobby.[19] The light construction and hollow nature of the structures allowed the jet fuel to penetrate far inside the towers, igniting many large fires simultaneously over a wide area of the impacted floors. The fuel from the planes burned at most for a few minutes, but the contents of the buildings burned over the next hour or hour and a half.[20] It has been suggested[by whom?] that the fires might not have been as centrally positioned, nor as intense, had traditionally heavy high-rise construction been standing in the way of the aircraft. Debris and fuel would likely have remained mostly outside the buildings or concentrated in more peripheral areas away from the building cores, which would then not have become unique failure points. In this scenario, the towers might have stood far longer, perhaps indefinitely.[21][22] The fires were hot enough to weaken the columns and cause floors to sag, pulling perimeter columns inward and reducing their ability to support the mass of the building above.[23][page needed] The final fires at the World Trade Center complex were extinguished on December 20, exactly 100 days after the attacks.[24] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 The new version of the A-Team opening titles hasn't got the same ring to it. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 100k+ kilos of aircraft with thousands of gallons of fuel on board hits a solid object at 500 mph "It would disintegrate on impact" top kek 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: 100k+ kilos of aircraft with thousands of gallons of fuel on board hits a solid object at 500 mph "It would disintegrate on impact" top kek Don't forget the pilot as well, he was a top specialist after his couple of lessons. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Bigmouth Strikes Again said: Don't forget the pilot as well, he was a top specialist after his couple of lessons. He was certainly shite at the landing part. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 There’s no way the American public would have accepted a war based on those incidents. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, welshbairn said: He was certainly shite at the landing part. Still won The Krypton Factor though. Very quick down a zipwire. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 (edited) 21 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: There’s no way the American public would have accepted a war based on those incidents. Yep, the old “fly a plane into two massive buildings in the most densely populated part of the country then sneak in and blow up the flaming buildings killing 3000 people” trick was definitely required. You’re probably maintaining your “but I’m not as stupid as @Kuro” position. Edited October 25, 2019 by The OP 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Stubbs Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 I find it curious that hardcore conspiracy theorists always bring up stuff like Operation Northwoods Most of these people think the Government is lying about absolutely everything but once a declassified report confirms their particular worldview, CIA memos and federal Government archives are to be taken as gospel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.