Jump to content

League Reconstruction 20/21 season


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, 8GamesToGo said:

So did the SPFL potentially, hence court.

I don't remember your court case ruling that the SPFL broke the rules. 

One thing is for certain, Hearts and Thistle have taken the league to court over an issue that could be dealt with by arbitration. That is 100% confirmed by your court case too, as they sent it to arbitration.

You've made your bed and shat in it, now you need to lie in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 8GamesToGo said:

The SFA are now showing exactly WHY we went to court first to ensure any arbitration was as fair as possible.

I mean there's really no mystery why Hearts and PT didn't;t run straight to the SFA - the SFA with Neil Doncaster and Rod Petrie on their board. What kind of hearing do you think we'd have got?

Well, no, because you're exactly where you would have been had you simply followed the SFA Articles in the first place.

The SFA Board has no say in whether or not disputes are referred to arbitration. 

7 minutes ago, 8GamesToGo said:

Going to court meant we got the documents and Clark insisted the panel were corporate law specialists with 10 years experience. No chance we'd have got that going straight to arbitration. Which we'll be able to argue. This seems like more stalling and intimidation to me.

The list of candidate members of the panel and the process of appointment will be done in accordance with Article 99 of the SFA Articles of Association.

In other words, how it would have been done without going to court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Master said:

Well, no, because you're exactly where you would have been had you simply followed the SFA Articles in the first place.

The SFA Board has no say in whether or not disputes are referred to arbitration. 

The list of candidate members of the panel and the process of appointment will be done in accordance with Article 99 of the SFA Articles of Association.

In other words, how it would have been done without going to court.

and the 10 year thang the good Lord was referring to was already part of the SFA articles of association... Said third Panel Member shall be or has been a solicitor or advocate of not less than ten years’ standing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ListerRRFC said:

I'm waiting on Falkirk's statement on the matter.

I imagine we'll be supportive of our esteemed governing body, particularly if the outcome is Hearts being forced to play at a lower level and Falkirk being selected for next season's Championship (like Raith).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gorgie greatness said:

We’d still finish above you diddies

 

9 minutes ago, Mr. X said:

That wouldn't be fair, we might only win the Championship by 10 points. ^_^

 

8 minutes ago, Gorgie greatness said:

Try to stay alive till October nobody can boycott the dead 💀 

Can taste the trophy and the seethe at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really appreciating how Hearts/Thistle fans are STILL treating this as them vs the big evil supremos Petrie/Doncaster when in essence it's them vs the rest of Scottish football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, badgerthewitness said:

I imagine we'll be supportive of our esteemed governing body, particularly if the outcome is Hearts being forced to play at a lower level and Falkirk being selected for next season's Championship (like Raith).

Welcome on board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lachlan Cameron indirectly called out Scot Gardiner as a liar today as well. Gardiner said there was a 100+ page document which they had to vote on. Lachlan saying it was only 14 or so pages and didn't know where this came from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just skipping ahead a few pages to say that I think the outcome will be Hearts and Thistle papped out of next seasons Scottish cup with Hearts also being punted out the semi.  Not that Hibs will get a by into the final.  We will have to play who they beat.  Rangers you say?  Why what a coincidence.  Anyway I’m away back to about page 757 to saviour this thread.  See you soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 8GamesToGo
13 minutes ago, The Master said:

Well, no, because you're exactly where you would have been had you simply followed the SFA Articles in the first place.

The SFA Board has no say in whether or not disputes are referred to arbitration. 

The list of candidate members of the panel and the process of appointment will be done in accordance with Article 99 of the SFA Articles of Association.

In other words, how it would have been done without going to court.

 

Oh aye, and if Hearts had gone straight to arbitration months ago folk would have screamed, "But reconstruction is still on the table!"

Lord Clark made a point of saying we went about things the right way by delaying action unit reconstruction couldn't happen.

I've been against legal action from the start. I naively thought clubs would rally round and get reconstruction done as the solution that damaged no clubs and actually rewarded some in the playoff spots and lower leagues. Now I hope we take this all the way. Interdict, Court of Arbitration, f**k everyone. May as well join in the general "f**k you" approach of the other clubs, the SPFL and now the SFA.

Edited by 8GamesToGo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...