badgertheeuro24witness Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 (edited) 54 minutes ago, Hedgecutter said: Big test for Starmer here at PMQs imo. He's just been handed the keys to the full arsenal. The thing about that is, he'll try to walk it in... Edited November 15, 2023 by badgerthewitness 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said: How dare the woke unelected socialist judges declare that Rwanda is unsafe! They've barely had any genocides in recent years. I turned onto GBnews at the announcement for the shit and giggles and wasn't disappointed. The gammon flunkies presenting were apoplectic, it was worthy of the heads gone thread on here. Only heard the words lefty and woke about a dozen times in the few minutes I sat chuckling at it. Priceless stuff. ETA all this while their messiah is in a jungle on the other side of the world whoring himself on a celebrity tv show. You couldn't make it up. Edited November 15, 2023 by Billy Jean King 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 Who's doing Froggy Fromage's GEEBEENOOZ prog while he's supplementing his vast income from being an MEP? I hope he gets severely chastised in the Antipodes. Missus. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 Sunak is toast here now. Despite the proximity to an almost certain leathering I can see him out on his arse well before any GE. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgecutter Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: Sunak is toast here now. Despite the proximity to an almost certain leathering I can see him out on his arse well before any GE. Political suicide for them imo, and I can't see them voluntarily handing the baton over. To a large number of Tory voters, one short-term PM is a f***-up, but two consecutive ones shows proper incompetence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 2 hours ago, Suspect Device said: SO how much money have we wasted on this unlawful and unworkable scheme? Including legal fees. The money for the costs of this car crash should be taken from Michelle Mone's arse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Rider Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 4 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: Sunak is toast here now. Despite the proximity to an almost certain leathering I can see him out on his arse well before any GE. That’s terrible. You’re talking about a hard working billionaire losing his job here….. The thought of going through the circus of watching the leadership candidates pitch to a few thousand foosty old snobs to be the next new Tory leader again makes me despair. Scotland needs out of this UK shiteshow ASAP. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 PMQ's was awful. "But you supported Corbyn 5 years ago!" is his answer to everything. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 10 minutes ago, scottsdad said: PMQ's was awful. "But you supported Corbyn 5 years ago!" is his answer to everything. But the Truss and Johnson govts, of which he was a major part, will be nothing to do with him and the current govt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneteaminglasgow Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 15 minutes ago, Soapy FFC said: But the Truss and Johnson govts, of which he was a major part, will be nothing to do with him and the current govt. I don’t think that he was actually in the Truss Government as a Minister. Not that it matters given that it only lasted about 20 minutes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 2 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said: I don’t think that he was actually in the Truss Government as a Minister. Not that it matters given that it only lasted about 20 minutes. I was thinking that after I posted, but like you said it was so short it probably doesn't matter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 I think Sunak's played a blinder. He knows full well he has zero chance of winning the next election, he's got rid of the most annoying people he has to work with, has put the loony right back in their box, can try and keep the government steady for the next year without total idiots fucking things up and leave with a reasonable reputation when he loses the election and moves to California to start a hedge fund using his father in law's money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effeffsee_the2nd Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 18 minutes ago, welshbairn said: I think Sunak's played a blinder. He knows full well he has zero chance of winning the next election, he's got rid of the most annoying people he has to work with, has put the loony right back in their box, can try and keep the government steady for the next year without total idiots fucking things up and leave with a reasonable reputation when he loses the election and moves to California to start a hedge fund using his father in law's money. given his circumstances, why the f**k would you even bother trying to do a job like being prime minister right now, why not just go straight to that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 Some Tory voices seem to be suggesting that the UK should just leave all these pesky treaties and agreements to just let the UK do whatever it wants. As I understand it, these rules not only apply to immigration, they also protect citizens (subjects?) from maltreatment by their own government. Perhaps we could get a list of all these protections so that when they are all repealed/ repudiated, we can know what a UK government will be allowed to do? I'm particularly looking forward to a future government being able to deport (or maybe even torture?) political opponents. Braverman seems keen on Rwanda. Just a thought. Pack yer bags, Suella, pick a windae, yer leavin'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 12 minutes ago, effeffsee_the2nd said: given his circumstances, why the f**k would you even bother trying to do a job like being prime minister right now, why not just go straight to that? To salvage his reputation and distance himself from the likes of Truss and Johnson. A reputation for weakness and incompetence would follow him into any career. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alert Mongoose Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 Does this mean that if someone were to plunge a dirk into this guy's neck, they wouldn't be liable for legal sanction? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 3 hours ago, Suspect Device said: SO how much money have we wasted on this unlawful and unworkable scheme? Including legal fees. Pretty sure Starmer said it was £140m during PMQs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 2 hours ago, coprolite said: ECHR to be under attack next. I can’t see it capturing the popular/ignorant imagination like the EU did but a quarter of a century ago I couldn’t envisage mass participation giving-a-shit about the EU, so who knows. Maybe thirty years as a fringe Tory and Tory press obsession might do the job on that too. The fact that being outside the ECHR wouldn’t have affected today’s decision is irrelevant. They will absolutely degrade our rights under the guise of ‘stopping the boats’ and ‘taking are country back’ type shite. All those gammony fuckers who voted brexit, ANYONE WHO VOTED FOR BREXIT IS A FUD will applaud it like a fucking seal, despite it opening the door for them to make you work longer for less, with less rights, less holidays. Honestly the electorate in this country are thick. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneteaminglasgow Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 19 minutes ago, Arch Stanton said: Pretty sure Starmer said it was £140m during PMQs. That’s just what they gave the Rwandan government, so when you throw in legal fees defending it (numerous times), civil servant time spent on it, Stella’s visit to Rwanda etc it’ll be more than that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted November 15, 2023 Share Posted November 15, 2023 8 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said: They will absolutely degrade our rights under the guise of ‘stopping the boats’ and ‘taking are country back’ type shite. All those gammony fuckers who voted brexit, ANYONE WHO VOTED FOR BREXIT IS A FUD will applaud it like a fucking seal, despite it opening the door for them to make you work longer for less, with less rights, less holidays. Honestly the electorate in this country are thick. Genuinely an element who would give up their own rights just so someone else gets a worse time too. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.