Jump to content

Next permanent Scotland manager


Richey Edwards

.  

253 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Binos said:

Baffled the entire political discourse has devolved to gender issues 

What about the economy 

 

You only get to discuss the issues if you meet the threshold of being a reasonable person who doesn't think they're entitled to things that others aren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Gaz said:

Let me rephrase that.

There isn’t *enough* genuine appetite for independence. Nowhere near enough to win a referendum.

There is nothing at all contentious here.  There isn't enough support for independence and the past two days have made it worse.  The hounding of Forbes will have shown 'the floating voter' the kind of intolerant, partisan, authoritarian hellhole iScot would be if a Yes vote was won so support will have dropped further.

I see the well-respected Indian Council of Scotland is at least trying to bring some sanity by highlighting their concerns about Humza:

indianc.thumb.jpeg.edae3de04b4aac2fe3a3ec5f848d6ddd.jpeg

That's in sharp contrast to an SNP staffer who wants Forbes suspended from the party for daring to call a double rapist a man:

 

Edited by The_Kincardine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, alta-pete said:

Humza’s getting the gig so the Murrells can continue to control from the shadows. 

Alongside keeping more of the bodies buried for longer. A useful patsy to absorb the fall out before stepping aside for one of the big hitters. The party machine has turned on Forbes and good to see groups like the indian and muslim council speak out against the chosen one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Donathan said:

If it’s someone from WM then my money would be on Black. They’d probably find an MSP with a safe seat who’s willing to go to Westminster, both resign and call a by-election, then swap seats. 

Aside from that being a really bad look, there's no time. Voting opens in 19 days and closes 2 weeks after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Iain said:

You only get to discuss the issues if you meet the threshold of being a reasonable person who doesn't think they're entitled to things that others aren't.

Humza avoided the vote too, with urgent business.  Threshold not met

The other one is a supporter of forbes,  threshold not met

Well done 

There any many issues that require debate as in any country,  not just one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Binos said:

Baffled the entire political discourse has devolved to gender issues 

It's because no one is ready to draw a line in the sand over it yet. ScotGov is refusing to take the Section 35 loss and wants to embark on a (highly likely) futile Supreme Court bid. The opposition within the party and the wider movement (Cherry/Wings)are utterly obsessed with it and for the media it's like shooting fish in a barrel, keeping a laser focus on this is an opportunity to expose the fault lines in the party with the added bonus of some dog whistling transphobia thrown in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a comment on the suitability of otherwise of Humza Yousaf but the first paragraph of this is utterly deranged (couldn't crop any further). Very disappointing to see organisations like this following the Board of Deputies game plan. 

IMG_20230222_105253.jpg

Edited by Genuine Hibs Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Binos said:

Humza avoided the vote too, with urgent business.  Threshold not met

The other one is a supporter of forbes,  threshold not met

Well done 

There any many issues that require debate as in any country,  not just one

Yousaf voted for it in the earlier stages of the bill, and has - publicly at least - backed it every step if the way.

The leadership election is now three days in, wasn't it inevitable it would be dominated by Gender in the early running given that those would be the first questions Forbes would be asked, and her less than progressive answers? 

Edited by renton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said:

There is nothing at all contentious here.  There isn't enough support for independence and the past two days have made it worse.  The hounding of Forbes will have shown 'the floating voter' the kind of intolerant, partisan, authoritarian hellhole iScot would be if a Yes vote was won so support will have dropped further.

I see the well-respected Indian Council of Scotland is at least trying to bring some sanity by highlighting their concerns about Humza:

indianc.thumb.jpeg.edae3de04b4aac2fe3a3ec5f848d6ddd.jpeg

That's in sharp contrast to an SNP staffer who wants Forbes suspended from the party for daring to call a double rapist a man:

 

Scotland should become a less  "intolerant, partisan, authoritarian hellhole" by electing a first minister that believes that.. *clears throat, pushes glasses up nose* ahem.. gay people shouldn't marry and that transgender people shouldn't exist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No right minded person would support a self-proclaimed racist or self-proclaimed misogynist for any elected office let alone that of First Minister.  Equally we should not be supporting a self-proclaimed homophobe.

 

And to preempt some possible responses, a homophobe is someone who does not think gay people should have the same rights as straight people and Forbes has made clear that this is her position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said:

There is nothing at all contentious here.  There isn't enough support for independence and the past two days have made it worse.  The hounding of Forbes will have shown 'the floating voter' the kind of intolerant, partisan, authoritarian hellhole iScot would be if a Yes vote was won so support will have dropped further.

I see the well-respected Indian Council of Scotland is at least trying to bring some sanity by highlighting their concerns about Humza:

indianc.thumb.jpeg.edae3de04b4aac2fe3a3ec5f848d6ddd.jpeg

 

Respect Kinky, branching out into multicultural sectarianism, quite the inclusionary!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Binos said:

So you are allowed to have a religion in this country but only if you do not express it's views publicly 

You can express them all you like, you're just not likely to get elected as leader of a modern progressive party if you wish it wasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...