Jump to content

Nicola Sturgeon Arrested, Peter Murrell Charged


Lex

Recommended Posts

On 12/06/2023 at 18:25, oneteaminglasgow said:

I’ve had Jim Eadie, Marco Biagi and Alex Cole-Hamilton as MSPs since I could vote, and Ian Murray, Sheila Gilmore and Christine Jardine as MPs.

Two c***s and four absolute nobodies. 

You’ve had more MSPs than that. Sometimes some of the List MSPs are way more helpful…and way more capable.

Edited by Scary Bear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Scary Bear said:

You’ve had more MSPs than that. Sometimes some of the List MSPs are way more helpful…and way more capable.

I’m not listing all the list MSPs though, there’s fucking loads of them.

Just had a look though, Jeremy Balfour and Sue Webber can be added to the list marked ‘c***s’ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert Maclennan and John Thurso.

Then briefly Alex Salmond, Colin Clark and now Richard Thomson. Marginal area where the Lib Dems used to turn out in significant numbers, then totally switched to support the Conservatives, and were only narrowly beaten out at he last election by the SNP. Labour are nowhere in that seat. Last place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how much longer it will be until there is further clarity.  If people, including Nicola Sturgeon, have done wrong then they should be getting charged and prosecuted.

The more lengthy the delays the more prejudicial it is to those individuals arrested, the SNP as an organisation nd the Independence movement as a whole.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

Not sure how much longer it will be until there is further clarity.  If people, including Nicola Sturgeon, have done wrong then they should be getting charged and prosecuted.

The more lengthy the delays the more prejudicial it is to those individuals arrested, the SNP as an organisation nd the Independence movement as a whole.

 

But she isn't being charged or prosecuted, so likely hasn't done anything wrong. Meaning there's going to be a lot of stupid looking people on this thread at the end of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

But she isn't being charged or prosecuted, so likely hasn't done anything wrong. Meaning there's going to be a lot of stupid looking people on this thread at the end of it all.

The thing is none of us know if Sturgeon and/or Murrell or anyone else have done anything wrong, including the idiots that pretend they do know.

I think that the police and the fiscal’s office must be given a reasonable amount of time to decide if any chargeable offences have been committed but they cannot be given a free hand to drag this on indefinitely without a clear outcome one way or another.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

The thing is none of us know if Sturgeon and/or Murrell or anyone else have done anything wrong, including the idiots that pretend they do know.

I think that the police and the fiscal’s office must be given a reasonable amount of time to decide if any chargeable offences have been committed but they cannot be given a free hand to drag this on indefinitely without a clear outcome one way or another.

 

I'm guessing given the high profile political nature of the case the cops will need to cross every T and dot every i whether there are charges or not, and financial cases always take a long time, I doubt if they have too many forensic accountants on staff. Hope it's all over soon though, whichever way it goes, seems a long time to spend on a campervan and a few hundred thousand of donated funds with questions about ring fencing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
7 hours ago, RuMoore said:

I actually listened to this radio interview and he sounded like a man defending his officers (correctly) but he really struggled after the initial question.

Suggested that it was proportionate to put a tent on the lawn  "due to the circumstances of that search" and "the tent was there to protect the interests of justice".

Even he doesnt believe that.............

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Leith Green said:

I actually listened to this radio interview and he sounded like a man defending his officers (correctly) but he really struggled after the initial question.

Suggested that it was proportionate to put a tent on the lawn  "due to the circumstances of that search" and "the tent was there to protect the interests of justice".

Even he doesnt believe that.............

 

Of course it was proportionate to have a dry safe place to lodge documentary productions and items from a house. These tents get used at any large scale search, its not a massive conspiracy its best practice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Of course it was proportionate to have a dry safe place to lodge documentary productions and items from a house. These tents get used at any large scale search, its not a massive conspiracy its best practice. 

There was a big house to keep all the shit in to go through. They could miss out on rain a falling, seagulls a shiting and bees a buzzing by not setting up a Fred west 12 man tent outside on their lawn. It was purely a state intervention by the polis who have took 2 steps back in Scotland after their overly Taggart crime scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Of course it was proportionate to have a dry safe place to lodge documentary productions and items from a house. These tents get used at any large scale search, its not a massive conspiracy its best practice. 

Which makes perfect sense.

It seems odd, therefore, that there was a deviation from this method in the search of the SNP offices in Edinburgh (when it was - in fact - raining) in that no tents were pitched, and they just loaded evidence into several vans.

It seems reasonable to question why there was a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leith Green said:

Which makes perfect sense.

It seems odd, therefore, that there was a deviation from this method in the search of the SNP offices in Edinburgh (when it was - in fact - raining) in that no tents were pitched, and they just loaded evidence into several vans.

It seems reasonable to question why there was a difference.

You could probably easily create a sterile area in a large reception area or clear part of a foyer or something, you cant do that in a cluttered house. Think about how your house looks. 
If im cataloguing documents which have to be signed and removed then they need to be laid out in a clear area, recorded properly, reviewed initially and packaged, that cannot be easily done for as large and complex a scale search of a house as was alleged to have been conducted. Its genuinely not rocket science, its why you see these tents outside a lot of search areas in houses. I had one not so long ago in very similar circumstances, lots of stuff needing removed from a cluttered house, no room in the house to create a sterile area so a tent outside was used to make sure everything was seized and recorded properly.

If that search was happening in a larger office building where you have a foyer/reception area which is open and not cluttered like yer typical house then a table and relevant area could be set up there for things to be reviewed, recorded and properly catalogued before they were packed up into the van. Its not even remotely rocket science, i cant even begin to process the ‘state intervention’ nonsense in dingus’ quote. The search which was conducted would have been led by licensed search trained police officers, called ‘Polsa’ trained officers, it’s their job to assess whats needed and proportionate, i’d hazard a guess that if my house was ever searched in a similar manner they’d need a tent for it too. 

If you want to believe in some kind of conspiracy theory nonsense then fine batter in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...