BillyAnchor Posted September 16, 2023 Share Posted September 16, 2023 On 15/09/2023 at 14:21, mathematics said: I would love this. I would fucking love this. I can't imagine she would much 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10menwent2mow Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 His defence of 'I basically raped but I was just a bit rapey, but I have admitted being a bit rapey, because that's just how I was, but it's all the media's fault.' Is mental. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlipperyP Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 (edited) Am I the only person that remembers him going about raves and festivals asking folk, that were obviously pilled to the nut, stupid questions, trying to f**k with their brains? This must have been mid 90's. He was a fucking weirdo then and my opinon has never changed. Sleazy c**t Edited September 17, 2023 by SlipperyP 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie adie Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 9 hours ago, Lex said: The media is absolutely rife with wrong uns. Can’t be many other industries that have such a high concentration of sex offenders working in it. This latest one to be exposed certainly isn’t a shock, I suspect the more surprising ones are to come. Metropolitan police? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongTimeLurker Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Guess the Burnistoun guys knew something about Russell Brand's reputation: 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pub car king Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Barrymore needs publicly reminded what a pariah he fucking is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dundeefc1783 Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 3 hours ago, SlipperyP said: Am I the only person that remembers him going about raves and festivals asking folk, that were obviously pilled to the nut, stupid questions, trying to f**k with their brains? This must have been mid 90's. He was a fucking weirdo then and my opinon has never changed. Sleazy c**t Vaguely remember this. Think it was on MTV. Agree he was an unfunny weird c**t then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 9 hours ago, blackislekillie said: "This is what they do "? Yes, you fucking entitled deviant nonentity. Good journalists tell the truth, have a basic grasp of morality and accountability. Moreover, they don't f**k young men then leave them to drown. c**t. I was concerned our wooky boomy chum had been hard done by, but when you put it like that… It’s almost as if they want to dictate what the truth is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 6 minutes ago, throbber said: look at this story here and how it’s being made out that this in some way exonerates Brand because he didn’t sexually abuse this particular individual. That “investigative journalist and PhD candidate”’s previous story was that Andrew Tate was framed. I’ll ignore that bloke, thanks. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 9 hours ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: I’d buy Peter Sloss’s book, to be fair. If he’s not on the list, I’ll eat my hat. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crawford Bridge Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 I hope he gets bummed in prison. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 26 minutes ago, throbber said: look at this story here and how it’s being made out that this in some way exonerates Brand because he didn’t sexually abuse this particular individual. She seems like a totally normal and sane individual. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael W Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 30 minutes ago, throbber said: look at this story here and how it’s being made out that this in some way exonerates Brand because he didn’t sexually abuse this particular individual. Harold Shipman didn't murder all of his patients either. Another risible contribution from a paid Twitter loser. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamamafegan Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 1 hour ago, LongTimeLurker said: Guess the Burnistoun guys knew something about Russell Brand's reputation: Thought I was the only one who remembered that… A FILTHY SEX BEAST! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 30 minutes ago, Michael W said: Harold Shipman didn't murder all of his patients either. Another risible contribution from a paid Twitter loser. E WAS FITTED UP TO COVER UP 4 THE DUCK OF EDINBORO KILLING GRANNYS 4 THERE BODY FLUIDS!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'WellDel Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Rapey-Wapey = Jaily-Waily. If it can hopefully be proven, fingers crossed he gets plenty Timey-Wimey. The Scummy-Wummy, Noncey-Woncey cnut. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted September 17, 2023 Author Share Posted September 17, 2023 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jagfox Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 Free transfer to Getafé on the cards... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted September 17, 2023 Share Posted September 17, 2023 I never watched the programme but did it say why the alleged victims went to the media rather than the police? Also, does this not have the potential to prejudice any possible trial? As it stands, Brand could be found guilty by the media without being found guilty in a court of law. As much as I don't like the guy, that can't really be fair. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.