Greenacres Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Queens really have to go on a winning.run to keep alive our slim playoffs hopes . Hopefully Marv sets us up.to attack not play boring football if we get.chances we must take them. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 3 hours ago, Greenacres said: Queens really have to go on a winning.run to keep alive our slim playoffs hopes . No shit Sherlock. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 There are a couple of Edinburgh based Queens fans who will wander along to this and who are good guys. As we're heading for L2 as long as we put on a good display I'm not too fussed. We've actually got a midweek at Kelty on Tuesday so as long as we come out of that unscathed... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
die hard doonhamer Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Think I’d make 3 changes from Saturday, depending on fitness. Gibson, Cochrane and Mumbongo for McKechnie, Ferguson and Doherty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) 22 minutes ago, die hard doonhamer said: Think I’d make 3 changes from Saturday, depending on fitness. Gibson, Cochrane and Mumbongo for McKechnie, Ferguson and Doherty. I'd agree with bringing those three in but I think Ferguson has done ok of late and although McKay was my mom on Saturday I'd leave him out. Surely we won't need a sitting midfielder against City? Edited to add, I'd expect Mumbongo to get 60/65 mins. Edited February 12 by bod 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 As has been said previously I’d like to see three changes from last weeks starting 11. This should be a relatively easy win for us, but we must take Bartley’s line-up and game plan into account. City’s young team no doubt will be full of enthusiasm and hopefully they’ll be feeling the effects of their midweek game. Bold, I know but I’m going for a 4-0 win for Queens to try and keep our diminishing chances of the play-offs alive! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 We played quite well at Kelty on Tuesday and scored-count them and weep Doonhamers- TWO goals!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Blue Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 hours ago, bod said: ... This should be a relatively easy win for us ... Gulp ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katboy Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 3 hours ago, bod said: As has been said previously I’d like to see three changes from last weeks starting 11. This should be a relatively easy win for us, but we must take Bartley’s line-up and game plan into account. City’s young team no doubt will be full of enthusiasm and hopefully they’ll be feeling the effects of their midweek game. Bold, I know but I’m going for a 4-0 win for Queens to try and keep our diminishing chances of the play-offs alive! What could possibly go wrong 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bod Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 52 minutes ago, Katboy said: What could possibly go wrong Everything, and probably will. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RubyTuesday Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 City are 14/1 to win this one. On the basis that something has to go right for us before the end of the season, I'm going to stick a tenner on that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Blue Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 28 minutes ago, RubyTuesday said: City are 14/1 to win this one. On the basis that something has to go right for us before the end of the season, I'm going to stick a tenner on that. If there's a game on which to back City before the end of the season, then this is it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjc-1988 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Barely believable that any team in same league could be 14/1 to beat us at their home ground. Clearly the Odds Compilers haven't actually seen us play? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 15 minutes ago, Rjc-1988 said: Barely believable that any team in same league could be 14/1 to beat us at their home ground. Clearly the Odds Compilers haven't actually seen us play? No but they've heard it was a good performance last week in our excellent 0-0 draw (against a side that even Edinburgh put 2 past) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 1 hour ago, Rjc-1988 said: Barely believable that any team in same league could be 14/1 to beat us at their home ground. It would be evens if it was at Palmerston. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stravaigar Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 9 hours ago, RubyTuesday said: City are 14/1 to win this one. On the basis that something has to go right for us before the end of the season, I'm going to stick a tenner on that. Get to the back of the line of Queens fans then ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 9 hours ago, RubyTuesday said: City are 14/1 to win this one. On the basis that something has to go right for us before the end of the season, I'm going to stick a tenner on that. Did you hit £100 by mistake? See it's come right in to 9's (McBookie) and 7's (365). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distant Doonhamer Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 (edited) Our line up according to BBC (I know) Queens subs 41.Trialist 5.McKay 11.McGuffie 22.Mumbongo 24.Ambrose 26.Ross 27.Gibson 28.Burns 30.Walker Edited February 17 by Distant Doonhamer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slipmat Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 Botterill, McClelland, Brydon, Kilsby, Logan, Ferguson, Cochrane, Connelly, McKechnie, Doherty, Reilly bench: McKay, McGuffie, Mumbongo, Ambrose, Ross, Gibson, Burns, Walker, Green So Efe makes way for Kilsby and Cochrane is back in place of McKay. Good to see Gibson back and Jay Burns on the bench for the first time. Have we signed Green or will this be the last time he can be named as a trialist? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted February 17 Share Posted February 17 3 minutes ago, Distant Doonhamer said: Our line up according to BBC (I know) Queens subs 41.Trialist 5.McKay 11.McGuffie 22.Mumbongo 24.Ambrose 26.Ross 27.Gibson 28.Burns 30.Walker That's actually pretty good, for the BBC. If it's 3 at the back, I imagine Connelly will play off the strikers. Could be 4 at the back with Connelly and McKechnie wide? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.