Jump to content

Unpopular opinions.


Recommended Posts

I've seen this triggered patter a few times. What does it mean?

As I understand it, they’ve “triggered” you in to a reaction. Even when it’s something as pish as;
“all teachers should look how I want them too”
“Well that’s just ridiculous, isn’t it?”
“TRIGGERED”
Aye, sound mate...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cardinal Richelieu said:

So what about people who can't have children? Or people who aren't churchgoers who don't believe that marriage has any relevance in today's society?

Edit: or gay people?

Surely you didn't miss the news that gay folk have the right to marriage too?

Folk who can't have kids obviously wouldn't qualify for voting on the basis of parenting, though I suppose adoption could be a qualifier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NJ2 said:

If it could lead to interesting debate or there was an opportunity to try and debunk his shite it’d be worthwhile but that won’t happen, he’ll just jump from extreme to extreme then say triggered.

Of course it could lead to an interesting discussion, if folk would stop triggering themselves at the slightest exposure to certain facts, opinions and ideas.

Intellectual pursuits - such as rights and responsibilities around democracy and suffrage, the quality of the folk teaching our children -aren't for everyone though, granted.

Edited by banana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you need a licence for your car, television, dog, to cut down certain trees, hold a street party, operate some HGV's and own an exotic pet - then you should have to obtain one before having a child; having some demonstrable ability to be able to provide for the thing would be a start, rather than relying on hand-outs from day one, let alone having the intellectual capacity to bring the thing up as a potentially worthwhile member of society rather than just another cretinous parasite...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Herman Hessian said:

if you need a licence for your car, television, dog, to cut down certain trees, hold a street party, operate some HGV's and own an exotic pet - then you should have to obtain one before having a child; having some demonstrable ability to be able to provide for the thing would be a start, rather than relying on hand-outs from day one, let alone having the intellectual capacity to bring the thing up as a potentially worthwhile member of society rather than just another cretinous parasite...

How would you qualify for such a license? What metrics?

I'm not sure anyone can prepare for having their first 24-hour wobbly screaming shitting machine. The baby is the manual, as they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, banana said:

How would you qualify for such a license? What metrics?

I'm not sure anyone can prepare for having their first 24-hour wobbly screaming shitting machine. The baby is the manual, as they say.

the two in the OP would do for a start...financial, intellectual and fiduciary eugenics

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it could lead to an interesting discussion, if folk would stop triggering themselves at the slightest exposure to certain facts, opinions and ideas.
Intellectual pursuits - such as rights and responsibilities around democracy and suffrage, the quality of the folk teaching our children -aren't for everyone though, granted.

Going from all teachers should be straight, married with 2.4 children, a semi-detached house and a dog to well let’s have blue haired, lesbian hippies teaching our children doesn’t lead to interesting discussions.
This thread, if nothing else, is evidence of that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NJ2 said:


Going from all teachers should be straight, married with 2.4 children, a semi-detached house and a dog to well let’s have blue haired, lesbian hippies teaching our children doesn’t lead to interesting discussions.
This thread, if nothing else, is evidence of that.

Bad faith strawmanning is the height of intellectual bankruptcy, you naughty boy.

Married, with children, from which people invariably abandon or temper their demented 'Progressive' and feminist outlooks of youth, is the core of what I'm suggesting as the starting point of what qualifies as a good role model for our children in schools. Few things as destructive to our boys as a whole as having male feminist teachers, same goes for girls and female feminist teachers.

I'd encourage same sex schools too, in a paired Brother school / Sister school structure to ensure there still plenty of fraternising.

Edited by banana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, banana said:

How would you qualify for such a license? What metrics?

I'm not sure anyone can prepare for having their first 24-hour wobbly screaming shitting machine. The baby is the manual, as they say.

This is the one silver lining of having a baby born premature and needing to spend time in a special care unit. You get at least some training from professional on how to care for the little screaming turd-and-vomit factory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...