jagfox Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Check out @MichaelBeale’s Tweet: Top marks for use of 'journey' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thruthenight Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 54 minutes ago, JamesM82 said: Linked with Gareth McAuley (39 in December) in the papers this morning. So... 38 then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Ovie Ejaria must be pish if even the Record can't spin him as a wonderkid. Old Rangers signings were always Real Madrid targets and had to jet in for talks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeBairn Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Signing a 38 year old Northern Irishman. Bet he never gets near the team but they'll use plenty of pictures of him in the orange away top. Staunchly staunch and all that.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiviLion Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 3 hours ago, alta-pete said: Doesn’t hurt but it certainly is tedious. We’ve got a GASL in charge, we don’t have a proper banking facility, he doesn’t have a UK banking facility to comply with Court rulings, we’ve two Directors resigned, we’ve overpaid Mexican alcoholics on the wage bill and I could go on... And the best you can come up with is standard Yer Da patter - ‘yer club died’? Cmon. I know it’s not Mensa in here at times but there’s surely no shortage of current ammunition if you’re feeling like you want a pop at us? 3 hours ago, alta-pete said: yer club died 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Hate to play devils advocate here so Tin (not Tim) hat firmly on.It would be pretty pathetic for any club with the resource rangers do to just lie down and say we will never ever catch Celtic and 2nd is fine.There is clearly a balance to be struck between the idea that rangers have to be the best in the land (nonsense) and that simply being a target. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 4 hours ago, Mayor Wilkins III said: "yer club died" is quite easily the worst thing that can be thrown at your sorry lot because you're the ones who sat and just watched it happen while everyone else watched and laughed. Everything that has happened since has been a good laugh, but nothing will be as funny as your lot going under. So "yer club died" will continue to be the thing that gets brought up. I cry every time someone says Sevco, it's just so upsetting.... 5 hours ago, Bairnardo said: . Quoted by mistake. 5 hours ago, coprolite said: Don’t believe the hype. You won’t challenge for the league this year. Accept it and move on. You will be happier. I’m not sure that Barker is the standard required to challenge for second, but the other two are. You guys make more of the challenging aspect than we do tbf, considering all that happened last season I was fairly happy. Think positive. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
senorsoupe Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 24 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Hate to play devils advocate here so Tin (not Tim) hat firmly on. It would be pretty pathetic for any club with the resource rangers do to just lie down and say we will never ever catch Celtic and 2nd is fine. There is clearly a balance to be struck between the idea that rangers have to be the best in the land (nonsense) and that simply being a target. Agree that they should aspire to catch Celtic, it's just the attitude that they are entitled to catch Celtic because they are Rangers that is so off-putting. They aren't entitled to anything but if they work hard and come up with a coherent plan they they absolutely could catch Celtic, but it's not some sort of god-given right that they be at the top. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jdog Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 10 minutes ago, bennett said: I cry every time someone says Sevco, it's just so upsetting.... We know that by your commitment to this forum...carry on son...carry on 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 Rangers signing a boy who was on loan at Sunderland last year. Plan the parade. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 2 hours ago, senorsoupe said: Agree that they should aspire to catch Celtic, it's just the attitude that they are entitled to catch Celtic because they are Rangers that is so off-putting. They aren't entitled to anything but if they work hard and come up with a coherent plan they they absolutely could catch Celtic, but it's not some sort of god-given right that they be at the top. Celtic fan complaining about a sense of entitlement........ 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted June 7, 2018 Share Posted June 7, 2018 1 hour ago, bennett said: Celtic fan complaining about a sense of entitlement........ Club 1872 asking for a sense of entitlement Please Donate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 16 hours ago, Dons_1988 said: Hate to play devils advocate here so Tin (not Tim) hat firmly on. It would be pretty pathetic for any club with the resource rangers do to just lie down and say we will never ever catch Celtic and 2nd is fine. There is clearly a balance to be struck between the idea that rangers have to be the best in the land (nonsense) and that simply being a target. A sensible and welcomed post. We'll probably win the league though still. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 16 hours ago, senorsoupe said: Agree that they should aspire to catch Celtic, it's just the attitude that they are entitled to catch Celtic because they are Rangers that is so off-putting. They aren't entitled to anything but if they work hard and come up with a coherent plan they they absolutely could catch Celtic, but it's not some sort of god-given right that they be at the top. Historically we are the bigger and better team, understandably people that have grown up watching that be the case expect it to still be the case when we're fully back on our feet. I don't know anyone that has the entitlement simply "because we're Rangers" it's more because we're used to being the superior club in a rivalry.. it's also not unrealistic as you've said for us to catch up with celtc so I wouldn't be surprised that a lot of people expect it to happen. I think it's probably worth noting that celtc are doing exceptionally well for themselves right now, they did well to get Rodgers so the sense of entitlement is probably more apparent because people aren't used to celtc being so well run and consistent, i'm not sure if it'll be a case of Rangers getting their act together or just celtc falling apart that will restore the natural order that we're all more used to. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 36 minutes ago, Stormzy said: Historically we are the bigger and better team, understandably people that have grown up watching that be the case expect it to still be the case when we're fully back on our feet. I don't know anyone that has the entitlement simply "because we're Rangers" it's more because we're used to being the superior club in a rivalry.. it's also not unrealistic as you've said for us to catch up with celtc so I wouldn't be surprised that a lot of people expect it to happen. I think it's probably worth noting that celtc are doing exceptionally well for themselves right now, they did well to get Rodgers so the sense of entitlement is probably more apparent because people aren't used to celtc being so well run and consistent, i'm not sure if it'll be a case of Rangers getting their act together or just celtc falling apart that will restore the natural order that we're all more used to. That's pish. Choose any period from the last War until today and you could hardly describe Rangers as the bigger and better team. Anybody starting watching in the mid-60s saw Celtic win 29 leagues to Rangers 20 and Celtic with the European Cup. Anyone starting after the Premier began in the mid-70s saw 20 Celtic wins to 19 by Rangers. Only someone joining the fun from the start of Rangers' 9IAR run could claim that Rangers were the bigger and better side. Of course, that Rangers club is dead now so it's all moot. And none of this 'big team found' stuff - it's just the facts. mam. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 (edited) Stormzy has dropped some nice bait, how many bites will it get Edited June 8, 2018 by Bohemian 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 Rangers' only recent period of significant dominance over Celtic came as a result of cheating, did it not? A vile organisation whose passing nobody regrets. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepundit Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, nsr said: Rangers' only recent period of significant dominance over Celtic came as a result of cheating, did it not? Well, the most recent period of significant dominance was the Walter Smith 3 in a row era. Were Rangers even spending more money on transfers and weekly salaries at that point? Not sure if they were. And they certainly weren't cheating. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 24 minutes ago, Bohemian said: Stormzy has dropped some nice bait, how many bites will it get Here to fight for truth, justice and a Milky Way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirrelhumper Posted June 8, 2018 Share Posted June 8, 2018 17 minutes ago, thepundit said: Well, the most recent period of significant dominance was the Walter Smith 3 in a row era. Were Rangers even spending more money on transfers and weekly salaries at that point? Not sure if they were. And they certainly weren't cheating. Well half his team had dual contracts so I think you're wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.