Broomhill Ultra Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 It doesn’t, drug companies are bound by law to announce results as soon as they’re obtained to stop insider trading. It’s f**k all to do with politics. All absolutely fine then.https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturers/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 15 hours ago, carpetmonster said: It doesn’t, drug companies are bound by law to announce results as soon as they’re obtained to stop insider trading. It’s f**k all to do with politics. I'm not sure they were duty bound to declare the results with phase 3 trials only half complete, and with little data released and no peer reviewed paper. I doubt it was political but it beggars belief that the CEO chose to predetermine that day for selling his shares without that bearing any role in choosing that day to announce it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 I know, I know.... same shit, different day. But damn... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 Someone just needs to shoot him in the face. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Steele Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 The Fool on the Hill really does want fighting on the streets, doesn't he?I'm getting an uneasy feeling that this isn't going to end well. Two belters. Progress, ffs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 Taking a break from golfing to shout some stuff about John Bolton for a change. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 15 minutes ago, RiG said: Taking a break from golfing to shout some stuff about John Bolton for a change. It’s amazing how many totally useless people Trump managed to appoint to top positions. It’s almost as if he didn’t know what he was doing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 15, 2020 Share Posted November 15, 2020 "Gee, let's go to war." lol just great posting once again 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 "Gee, let's go to war." lol just great posting once again"A real dope!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 12 hours ago, RiG said: Taking a break from golfing to shout some stuff about John Bolton for a change. Surely falsely accusing someone of a serious federal offence crosses the line for defamation even in the US? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 26 minutes ago, GordonS said: Surely falsely accusing someone of a serious federal offence crosses the line for defamation even in the US? He's flat-out accused people of murder before. I presume whatever he says as president is protected by some bullshit free speech mandate. I don't remember him accusing anyone of paedophilia, though. Huh. Wonder why. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, BFTD said: He's flat-out accused people of murder before. I presume whatever he says as president is protected by some bullshit free speech mandate. I don't remember him accusing anyone of paedophilia, though. Huh. Wonder why. He's gone pretty close to endorsing QAnon's theory of top Democrats being cannibal paedophiles with a stash of kids hidden in tunnels under Washington. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 38 minutes ago, GordonS said: Surely falsely accusing someone of a serious federal offence crosses the line for defamation even in the US? He's had licence to say / do pretty much anything he wants as the GOP don't seem to have any interest in getting him to tone things down. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, welshbairn said: He's gone pretty close to endorsing QAnon's theory of top Democrats being cannibal paedophiles with a stash of kids hidden in tunnels under Washington. Did he name individuals? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 8 minutes ago, welshbairn said: He's gone pretty close to endorsing QAnon's theory of top Democrats being cannibal paedophiles with a stash of kids hidden in tunnels under Washington. Yeah, that's why it occurred to me. Strikes me as something he'd pick up and run with, but he's been quite vague about the whole thing. Maybe even he can see that fully embracing conspiracy theories about Satanic rape/murder cults is a bit batshit, or maybe paedophilia is a topic he'd rather stay away from. It certainly won't have anything to do with decency. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 The first time Trump was made aware of Q-Anon was a reporter basically saying “they’re a group of people that believe you are a lone crusader against a cabal of sickos that hate America” which in hindsight I think was a genius move on her part as how does anyone expect Trump to react to that other than how he did react which was “would that be so bad?” If you wanted Trump to endorse an insane conspiracy literally just feed himthe line that they first and foremost believe he is a persecuted hero. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 19 minutes ago, GordonS said: Did he name individuals? No, he just did his usual "a lot of people think that, I don't know anything about it, but these guys really don't like paedophiles". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 1 hour ago, GordonS said: Surely falsely accusing someone of a serious federal offence crosses the line for defamation even in the US? I think the Government's trying to charge him for stuff he put in his book, even though they reviewed it before publication. P.S. Here we go. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/15/us/politics/john-bolton-book-criminal-investigation.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, NotThePars said: The first time Trump was made aware of Q-Anon was a reporter basically saying “they’re a group of people that believe you are a lone crusader against a cabal of sickos that hate America” which in hindsight I think was a genius move on her part as how does anyone expect Trump to react to that other than how he did react which was “would that be so bad?” If you wanted Trump to endorse an insane conspiracy literally just feed him the line that they first and foremost believe he is a persecuted hero. It would be great if Trump turned out to be Q. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 20 minutes ago, NotThePars said: The first time Trump was made aware of Q-Anon was a reporter basically saying “they’re a group of people that believe you are a lone crusader against a cabal of sickos that hate America” which in hindsight I think was a genius move on her part as how does anyone expect Trump to react to that other than how he did react which was “would that be so bad?” If you wanted Trump to endorse an insane conspiracy literally just feed him the line that they first and foremost believe he is a persecuted hero. Not having that part. He spends most of his day browsing the internet and Googling his own name, and had people tweeting this fantasy nonsense at him for months. He was likely one of the first people outside of their community to become aware of it. He just didn't want to talk about it because the obvious question would be, "innocent people are seriously being accused of being paedophile vampires - why haven't you put this shit to bed before somebody is killed?" The answer being, "because they say nice things about me and I am a fucking child". 16 minutes ago, welshbairn said: It would be great if Trump turned out to be Q. I don't think he's smart enough, but he absolutely wishes he came up with the idea. It's right up his alley, but If he came up with it, it would likely include mentions of his ability to fly, see through solid concrete to track trafficked kids, and invoke the wrath of God through his holy tweets. Because he is a fucking child. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.