tree house tam Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 23 hours ago, Peppino Impastato said: will just turn out to be a slightly bigger new version of McDiarmid park. Which is miles better than Pittodrie, everyone's a winner. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Grimes Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Have a feeling this won’t get the go ahead but I hope I’m wrong I genuinely understand the reservations but long term I think this will be brilliant for the Club And I think we all want to see tears & snotters from the No Kingsford lot later on 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 11 minutes ago, Frank Grimes said: Have a feeling this won’t get the go ahead but I hope I’m wrong I genuinely understand the reservations but long term I think this will be brilliant for the Club And I think we all want to see tears & snotters from the No Kingsford lot later on I would expect it to get the go ahead with the Council citing the expected economic benefit as a reason of overriding public interest in going against their own development plans and policy however N2K will launch a legal challenge of that decision. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betting competition Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) 55 minutes ago, shootingboots said: This has surely got to be the most boring thread on the www's. I wish it was going to be over today. Hopefully it gets fast tracked to the scottish government to make a quick decision although I can see it will be decided at the end of the year. Edited January 29, 2018 by betting competition 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 I personally don't think Aberdeen FC have gone anywhere near far enough. They should build the new stadium and training complex in Rothienorman..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Grimes Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 33 minutes ago, RiG said: I would expect it to get the go ahead with the Council citing the expected economic benefit as a reason of overriding public interest in going against their own development plans and policy however N2K will launch a legal challenge of that decision. If it does go ahead there will be bluster regarding a legal challenge but where are they getting the cash for that? They say they’ve raised £5,000 but need £55,000 more.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 1 hour ago, Frank Grimes said: Have a feeling this won’t get the go ahead but I hope I’m wrong I genuinely understand the reservations but long term I think this will be brilliant for the Club And I think we all want to see tears & snotters from the No Kingsford lot later on Oh aye, already laughing at Diane Reid desperately lying on GMS this morning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 23 minutes ago, betting competition said: I wish it was going to be over today. Hopefully it gets fast tracked to the scottish government to make a quick decision although I can see it will be decided at the end of the year. Unless they call it in the next 30 minutes the SG will have almost no say on the matter. 16 minutes ago, Frank Grimes said: If it does go ahead there will be bluster regarding a legal challenge but where are they getting the cash for that? They say they’ve raised £5,000 but need £55,000 more.... Who knows? It's damn expensive to launch a judicial review so they'll need to find a lot more dough from somewhere if they want to go ahead with it. Unless they apply for some kind of protective expenses order (I think that's what it's called) which could limit their costs if they lose to a smaller figure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anotherchance Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Squeaky bum time now.Hopefully if the right decision is made, those who aren’t as convinced about it get behind it and, eventually, and their fears are shown to be unfounded.In the short term, it would be good fun to see the NIMBY meltdown in full flow. Everything crossed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betting competition Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, RiG said: Unless they call it in the next 30 minutes the SG will have almost no say on the matter. I thought it had to go to the Scottish Government due to Aberdeenshire Council objecting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betting competition Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 2 hours ago, gkneil said: If anyone is interested, link to the webcast of the meeting at 10:30 for the council decision on this: https://aberdeen.public-i.tv/core/portal/webcast_interactive/331114 Council TV nae working ha ha ha 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 (edited) 32 minutes ago, betting competition said: I thought it had to go to the Scottish Government due to Aberdeenshire Council objecting. I don't think so. For certain types of applications if a neighbouring authority objects and doesn't withdraw that objection the application would go to a public inquiry, chaired by an independent reporter appointed by the SG. However in this case what needs to happen is that ACC must notify the SG of their decision (due to the Aberdenshire objection) and then the SG will decide whether or not to call in the application. However the SG tend to leave local applications to local government rather than call them in for scrutiny so I'd be surprised if, once notified, they decide to call it in. Edited January 29, 2018 by RiG 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkneil Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Council TV nae working ha ha ha Nae doot 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 10 minutes ago, RiG said: I don't think so. For certain types of applications if a neighbouring authority objects and doesn't withdraw that objection the application would go to a public inquiry, chaired by an independent reporter appointed by the SG. However in this case what needs to happen is that ACC must notify the SG of their decision (due to the Aberdenshire objection) and then the SG will decide whether or not to call in the application. However the SG tend to leave local applications to local government rather than call them in for scrutiny so I'd be surprised if, once notified, they decide to call it in. It will be called in as the proposals depend on the CPZ in Aberdeenshire. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Controlled Parking Zones 30 minutes walk away, that's a mile and a half, f**k that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkneil Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Webcast working now 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Grimes Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Looks like it could be fucked Aberdeenshire Council can veto the bridge and therefore the project as a whole NIMBYs rejoice 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 "Fit does yer 4g mean exactly?"Not a good sign. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Marie Boulton clearly against the bag 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 29, 2018 Share Posted January 29, 2018 Couldn't televise a planning meeting is the new couldn't organise a piss up in brewery. IMO 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.