Jump to content

Prince Andrew BBC


D.A.F.C

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Michael W said:

Think we're forgetting this is a man that thought it would be a good idea to go on TV and talk about the allegations against him, inventing a number of complete lies in a desperate attempt to give himself an alibi. A man whom was even afforded the opportunity to go over the questions in advance and set the boundaries, yet went ahead and spraffed a load of shite anyway. 

He is a complete simpleton that has no shame at all. 

In hindsight the funniest part of the Maitless interview is that PAs initial thoughts were that it had gone well. 😂

Edited by btb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, btb said:

In hindsight the funniest part of the Maitless interview is that PAs initial thoughts were that it had gone well. 😂

I'd forgotten about that! Good grief. 

I can't find it now, but I remember reading an article about Andrew in the aftermath of that. It wasn't centred on the allegations, but instead looked at his "diplomatic efforts" whilst a trade envoy (conclusion: largely shit) and noted that was not very intelligent and easily dazzled by power. 

An assessment that is pretty spot, really. Imagine putting up a bloody royal to try and impress and then it's said royal that's the one hopelessly dazzled at a man in a suit who can conduct a semi-competent sales pitch. Or, of course, continues to hang around with a convicted paedophile. 

Edited by Michael W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just how dodgy is Andy Pandy?

Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson named in legal case over £750,000 ‘scam’ | Prince Andrew | The Guardian

Quote

Nebahat Isbilen, 77, was allegedly tricked by Selman Turk into giving Prince Andrew £750,000 “by way of payment for assistance” with her passport, court documents reportedly show.

The documents reveal the prince has since repaid the cash after Isbilen alleged it was a scam. There is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the prince or Ferguson.

Edit - On a general point all three of Lizzie's boys have been found out for taking cash for favours! Liz herself has used the royal prerogative over 700 times during her reign to have legislation ammended in her favour - a right unsavoury bunch!

Edited by btb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, btb said:

Hang on... Woman gives Ponce Andrew three quarters of a million to help her get a passport; she then alleges it's a scam and he returns the money. Yet "there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the prince". So WTF did he take the money for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GordonD said:

Hang on... Woman gives Ponce Andrew three quarters of a million to help her get a passport; she then alleges it's a scam and he returns the money. Yet "there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the prince". So WTF did he take the money for?

Would you turn down the offer of £750k to not do anything in return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, GordonD said:

Hang on... Woman gives Ponce Andrew three quarters of a million to help her get a passport; she then alleges it's a scam and he returns the money. Yet "there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the prince". So WTF did he take the money for?

You have to think the "no suggestion of any wrongdoing" is ironic, like I said in my edit all three of Lizzie's boys have taken "cash for favors" @Arch Stanton you'd have to think if they were from a council estate they'd have done time at Lizzie's pleasure!

Edited by btb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GordonD said:

Hang on... Woman gives Ponce Andrew three quarters of a million to help her get a passport; she then alleges it's a scam and he returns the money. Yet "there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing by the prince". So WTF did he take the money for?

The life of a royal.

"Here's three-quarters of a million pounds, your Highness"
"Of course! That's the least you owe me for being in my divine presence"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
7 minutes ago, Fullerene said:

No doubt the same thing should happen here for the Earl of Inverness.

He's still The Duke of York. It's just the freedom of the city he got sacked from. Apparently, only The Monarch can remove titles.

Edited by Sergeant Wilson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said:

He's still The Duke of York. It's just the freedom of the city he got sacked from. Apparently, only The Monarch can remove titles.

Okay.  I just think that if he can't graze his sheep in York, then he shouldn't be allowed to bring them up to Inverness instead.

I don't think it would be appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just urban myth that being granted the 'Freedom' of a town or city means that local hostelries are not really supposed to charge you for refreshments and lodgings?

I mean, if it is indeed the case, then that's Andy fucked if he ever wants to go on a cheap stag-do and then crash in a Travel Lodge in York.

Edited by Boo Khaki
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said:

Is it just urban myth that being granted the 'Freedom' of a town or city means that local hostelries are not really supposed to charge you for refreshments and lodgings?

I mean, if it is indeed the case, then that's Andy fucked if he ever wants to go on a cheap stag-do and then crash in a Travel Lodge in York.

Yes, it’s an urban myth.  I’ve got my burgess ticket in Glasgow, and still get charged for my pints!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Boo Khaki said:

So unless you own sheep, it's pretty meaningless then?

I don't even think it gives you any privileges in regards to your sheep. It was previously used to grant peasants freedom from serfdom in Medieval times but as far as I can see you get f**k all from it these days. It's a pat on the back for being a good c**t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming as the TV is now in full 40th anniversary Falklands swing some stories of his bravery and how he single-handed won the war are due to suffer. Or whatever it was he did that removed his inability to sweat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...