Sergeant Wilson Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 6 minutes ago, MONKMAN said: 21st century Britain. Harry was literally punted from the family for having the audacity to marry a black girl, yet the establishment are throwing everything they can at defending this nonce. Black, divorced, pain in the arse...it all adds up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accies1874 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I had no idea that's where "motel" came from. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 52 minutes ago, MONKMAN said: 21st century Britain. Harry was literally punted from the family for having the audacity to marry a black girl, yet the establishment are throwing everything they can at defending this nonce. Remember when the BBC was doing the same? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resk Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Witchell is an utter c**t. Weirdly, and depressingly, it appears that he is not the BBC's only royal correspondent. There's a woman with the same job title who pops up occasionally with the same cringingly sycophantic approach. The other day it was a hard-hitting report interviewing residents of some town in England about their memories of a street party they had ten years ago for some royal anniversary or other. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 25 minutes ago, resk said: Witchell is an utter c**t. Weirdly, and depressingly, it appears that he is not the BBC's only royal correspondent. There's a woman with the same job title who pops up occasionally with the same cringingly sycophantic approach. The other day it was a hard-hitting report interviewing residents of some town in England about their memories of a street party they had ten years ago for some royal anniversary or other. The other moron they used to have was Jennie Bond 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Quote Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell say she deserves a new trial after a juror told media that he used his own experience of being sexually abused to persuade other jurors who doubted witnesses. Ghislaine Maxwell: Lawyers call for retrial over juror comments - BBC News 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priti priti priti Patel Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, Zen Archer (Raconteur) said: Ghislaine Maxwell: Lawyers call for retrial over juror comments - BBC News There is honestly no end to the level of self serving idiocy in that country. What a fucking idiot. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 When Lizzie dies I'm watching the news until I see Witchell break down in tears. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, Miguel Sanchez said: When Lizzie dies I'm watching the news until I see Witchell break down in tears. We should run a sweep for the burial - how many security guards will be needed to stop him throwing himself in with her? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 18 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said: We should run a sweep for the burial - how many security guards will be needed to stop him throwing himself in with her? Suttee isn't condoned by those C of E feckers, is it ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, Florentine_Pogen said: Suttee isn't condoned by those C of E feckers, is it ? I think they prefer an armchair 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 75 pages in, and I'm still reading the thread title as "Prince Andrew - Big Black Cock". 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 18 minutes ago, Boghead ranter said: 75 pages in, and I'm still reading the thread title as "Prince Andrew - Big Black Cock". Depressingly, that would likely be considered a more scandalous story than "Pronce Andrew shags teenagers trafficked by convicted paedophile's pimp". 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deegee Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 For me, it’s all a matter of timing and when the Queen passes away. Andrew will be desperate for her to be alive as long as possible to try put some time and distance between these current problems. If Queenie departs soon, there’ll be literally no protection and the rest of his family (excluding his ex wife/ friend with benefits Sarah maybe) will probably be happy to toss him on the bonfire. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Mark Connolly said: We should run a sweep for the burial - how many security guards will be needed to stop him throwing himself in with her? However many I hope they all fail spectacularly. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 1 hour ago, Zen Archer (Raconteur) said: Ghislaine Maxwell: Lawyers call for retrial over juror comments - BBC News So the American Justice system, in this case, now exposed as shambolic, to put it mildly. This will hardly have escaped Andrew's lawyers, who will obviously do what they can to exploit this turn up in events. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyAnchor Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 8 hours ago, accies1874 said: 9 hours ago, Arch Stanton said: I had no idea that's where "motel" came from. To get to work I drive past a row of them where apparently ladies of the night rent them by the hour. Unusual to find them now in US and A as big corporations have turned most into chains. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 (edited) Witchell is absolutely hilarious. Absolutely reprehensible and pathetic human being but his reports, particularly on Harry and Meghan, are gold. The very definition of ‘on the verge of tears’. Edited January 6, 2022 by Dons_1988 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 6 hours ago, ICTJohnboy said: So the American Justice system, in this case, now exposed as shambolic, to put it mildly. This will hardly have escaped Andrew's lawyers, who will obviously do what they can to exploit this turn up in events. Does beggar belief that the defence didn't strike the juror from the list unless they knew all along they would have that ace up their sleeve for future use. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 20 hours ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said: Appreciate legislation varies in Scotland and England but in Scots law if you take someone from a house to another house across the street for purposes of them being forced into selling sex then its trafficking. Proving that Epstein trafficked girls is not difficult, you can use the evidence/witnesses/ascertained facts of the prosecutions of Epstein and Maxwell, there is no real contention that it happened. Its a complete disgrace. Its not the under age aspect here, yes she was 17, its the inference that she was groomed trafficked and pressured/forced to have non-consensual sex, thats the pertinent parts to the UK here and how the Met seem incapable of grasping/unwilling is the disgrace. Swap the sweaty gimp for the woman who killed Harry Dunn. But what offence would Andrew be charged with, not trafficking surely? If so, that joining of dots would be enough to protect him under Epstein's deal wouldn't it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.