19QOS19 Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Andy Robertson's a sore loser*, eh? *Or draw-er... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreenElves Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Just now, 19QOS19 said: Andy Robertson's a sore loser, eh? What did he say? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 What did he say?Nothing too bad, just his attitude screamed of sour grapes. "You know what you get against an Allardyce side, they sit in and look to score their ONE chance". I only tuned in near the end so assumed Liverpool battered them and just failed to score. West Brom had more shots on target than them ffs. Klopp now greetin' about them sitting in as well. Why are big sides always shocked when wee sides do this? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 I think they've started interviewing Robertson a bit more recently as they've realised his post match comments can be a bit spicy at times. Since that post-Barcelona interview in 2019. On the Burnley disallowed goal? Why didn't VAR step in? It was clearly a perfectly legal goal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted December 27, 2020 Author Share Posted December 27, 2020 39 minutes ago, craigkillie said: Every time I've seen this Williams boy he looks like he won a Liverpool contract in a raffle. Is that the young boy they spent an absolute fortune on? 29 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said: Curtis Jones doesn’t look great either. I think he looks half decent against teams that are willing to give him space. Camp in front of him he's a gormless string bean. Will end up at West Brom or their ilk soon enough. 16 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: Andy Robertson's a sore loser*, eh? He's a greeting faced c**t. Him and Alexander Arnold. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 58 minutes ago, Gianfranco said: Liverpool dropping points is good for the league. Delighted for Big Sam. FTFY 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Podence auditioning for the Liverpool/Man United diving units I see. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David W Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Mourinho parking the bus has backfired again, just like v Crystal Palace. Now Kane does a ridiculous dive and gets away without a booking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Lovely to see the local minnows boosting Villa's title hopes today. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 Two ridiculous decisions against Burnley today.Never a penalty for Leeds.Definitely a penalty for Burnley.I can understand the first one but the second one was just unforgivable - Mee was clearly fouled - yet the ref gave the foul against him.Utter nonsense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 Robertson is greeting face. The epitome of Liverpool. Tierney is a superior player. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 12 hours ago, David W said: Mourinho parking the bus has backfired again, just like v Crystal Palace. Now Kane does a ridiculous dive and gets away without a booking. And blaming his own players for his shortcomings already. This usually happens in year three, much quicker this time. The biggest fraud in football getting found out quicker this time, pleasing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 13 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Two ridiculous decisions against Burnley today. Never a penalty for Leeds. Definitely a penalty for Burnley. I can understand the first one but the second one was just unforgivable - Mee was clearly fouled - yet the ref gave the foul against him. Utter nonsense. The one where Bamford was wiped out by the keeper after getting to the ball first? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsforlife Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 14 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: I can understand the first one but the second one was just unforgivable - Mee was clearly fouled - yet the ref gave the foul against him. Utter nonsense. I don’t get the controversy on this. Ball is there for the keeper to claim, he gets to it and is impeaded by mee who got nowhere near the ball. Sure he should still hold it but ref is right to give the foul. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest_Fifer Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 I don’t get the controversy on this. Ball is there for the keeper to claim, he gets to it and is impeaded by mee who got nowhere near the ball. Sure he should still hold it but ref is right to give the foul.Nope. MotD called it, if a defender had gone up for the header and cleaned out Mee to get there, it would have been a penalty. Just because it was the keeper, doesn't allow him to knee a player in the back before he even touched the ball 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 The one where Bamford was wiped out by the keeper after getting to the ball first?So you agree it wasn’t a penalty. That’s right, Bamford got to the ball first. So did anyone else play the ball prior to the collision? Yes, Nick Pope did, so no penalty.You have fallen for the old line of “got to the ball first” which is a perfectly good reason to award a penalty provided the player committing the offence doesn’t play that ball because he was beaten to it.In this case, Pope legitimately made contact with the ball after Bamford, so no offence was committed, so no penalty. It’s not even a grey area. VAR have given themselves a grey area to protect decisions made by their referees......”not a clear and obvious” error. That was used to full effect in Leeds favour yesterday.If the laws had been applied based on factual evidence, the result would have been 0-1 to Burnley. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 Simply getting the ball initially doesn't give free reign to take a guy down after you've done so. If he'd gone down under that initial challenge then fair enough, but he didn't. He still had a shot at getting the ball after the initial challenge and was taken down. That's a foul. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanburn Dave Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 Title odds :- Liverpool Evens, Manchester City 13/8 Manchester United 10/1 , Chelsea 17/1 , Spurs 19/1 and Leicester 33/1,. Everton at 50/1. Every team looks capable of dropping points just now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 Title odds :- Liverpool Evens, Manchester City 13/8 Manchester United 10/1 , Chelsea 17/1 , Spurs 19/1 and Leicester 33/1,. Everton at 50/1. Every team looks capable of dropping points just now.The bookies obviously agree but despite the current tightness, only two of those teams are proven capable of finding the neccessary consistency. The same two are proven capable of going on a proper run and putting daylight behind them, but one of the two is a year further removed from showing it, so its Liverpools title again for me Jeff. By quite a comfortsble margin in the end...... Jeff 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheScarf Posted December 28, 2020 Share Posted December 28, 2020 40 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said: So you agree it wasn’t a penalty. That’s right, Bamford got to the ball first. So did anyone else play the ball prior to the collision? Yes, Nick Pope did, so no penalty. You have fallen for the old line of “got to the ball first” which is a perfectly good reason to award a penalty provided the player committing the offence doesn’t play that ball because he was beaten to it. In this case, Pope legitimately made contact with the ball after Bamford, so no offence was committed, so no penalty. It’s not even a grey area. VAR have given themselves a grey area to protect decisions made by their referees......”not a clear and obvious” error. That was used to full effect in Leeds favour yesterday. If the laws had been applied based on factual evidence, the result would have been 0-1 to Burnley. He absolutely wiped Bamford out. Its a penalty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.