Jump to content

European Super League.


Lofarl

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, G51 said:

Will it even matter? Chelsea are extremely replaceable.

I think it will. This thing does need some veneer of legitimacy and if one club publicly rebukes it then it makes it more tenuous as a venture.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

MLB make a lot of their money from local television stations and almost all the clubs have some sort of ownership stake in the station. Online is very much a secondary source of income.  Especially for baseball which has a much older audience than other sports.

And MLB only started allowing local fans to stream games in 2019 and not every team has streaming available.

I read an article around a year ago that suggested the below. Struggling to find it now which is making me question if I was reading about one of the other predominantly North American sports.

9 minutes ago, DiegoDiego said:


Until recently MLB had sports' most profitable app.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

I think it will. This thing does need some veneer of legitimacy and if one club publicly rebukes it then it makes it more tenuous as a venture.

 

 

I think we're going to see a divide now between the owners who own superclubs for sportswashing/influence (PSG, Man City, Chelsea) and those who own superclubs to make money from them (Arsenal, Man Utd, Liverpool, the Italian clubs).

The bad PR has likely meant that the sportswashers have concluded that the better move is to withdraw, so I think Man City will likely do the same in the near future. But I think the rest of them are still going to try and make it work. The money is all that matters to them.

Edited by G51
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fucking hell, you know it’s bad when the mental Russian billionaire / Bond villain is the one concerned about the backlash.


I know there’s quotes about them expecting a backlash but I’m not convinced they knew it would be quite as big. Think they perhaps only expected UEFA to be a problem and some fans groups. Seen a few suggest Chelsea and Spurs probably weren’t the driving force behind this but didn’t fancy being left behind so they were probably the most likely to bottle it when the backlash came and threats from all sides.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, G51 said:

I think we're going to see a divide now between the owners who own superclubs for sportswashing/influence (PSG, Man City, Chelsea) and those who own superclubs to make money from them (Arsenal, Man Utd, Liverpool, the Italian clubs).

The bad PR has likely meant that the sportswashers have concluded that the better move is to withdraw, so I think Man City will likely do the same in the near future. But I think the rest of them are still going to try and make it work. The money is all that matters to them.

As if by magic...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is quite satisfying to see these clubs shite themselves a bit and realise that although they've shafted their fans for years, there is a line they can't cross. Although they shouldn't be praised for this, the greedy c***s agreed to it in the first place and their desire to do something like this in the future won't just dissapear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...