Sergeant Wilson Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 17 minutes ago, Wile E Coyote said: Nothing will come of this legally. She will not press charges (or be paid not to) and without her there is no case. The fans won't forget he is a rapist woman beater though That is likely to be the very big issue. She'll have, literally, millions thrown at her to retract. She might even have a few bob to continue with prosecution from some quarters. Not easy for her. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 35 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: You aren't "uninformed" though. That's entirely my point. I'm very much against people jumping on bandwagons to condemn other people when the only 'evidence' is one person's word against another's but in this case there is clear evidence of what has taken place. We don't need a court hearing to determine whether or not he's guilty. The only thing required from a court is a sentence. I would however love to hear what you think Greenwood's side is though. “We don't need a court hearing to determine whether or not he's guilty.” Scary. ”I would however love to hear what you think Greenwood's side is though.” I’ve told you, I’ve no idea. You don’t think due process is necessary and you can’t follow a basic thread of discussion. Please, never serve on a jury. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 19 minutes ago, Wile E Coyote said: Nothing will come of this legally. She will not press charges (or be paid not to) and without her there is no case. The fans won't forget he is a rapist woman beater though That’s not how it works. It’s for the Police and CPS to decide. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fratelli Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 (edited) The quote from her Dad is a shocker, although there is a bit at the start of the quote which has been cut out of the screenshot going around. It adds a slightly different tone to it, but it's still a mental thing to say regardless. As others have pointed out, it does seem like his antics have been known amongst folk within football and the media, and that folk knew he had something like this hanging over him. I remember seeing a rumour on Twitter around a year ago of him having some sort of altercation with his girlfriend but nothing ever came of it. That comment on Reddit from last year isn't hard to believe. The more i think about it, the media buzz around him did seem to disappear pretty quickly last year, he went from being talked about every week as the next superstar, to going under the radar somewhat. In previous years his omission from the England squad would've been the subject of radio phone ins, endless articles etc but it was basically a non issue. Edited January 30, 2022 by Fratelli 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wile E Coyote Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Just now, Thorongil said: That’s not how it works. It’s for the Police and CPS to decide. Its exactly how it works. They decide if there is enough evidence to get a likely conviction. Without her evidence there is f**k all chance 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charles Stiles Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 39 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: We don't need a court hearing to determine whether or not he's guilty. The only thing required from a court is a sentence. From what I've seen a couple of times elsewhere, that could be a problem. Some are saying that by posting the video she has inadvertently made a fair trial virtually impossible meaning it can't go that far. It could be one reason it was taken down but of course that doesn't matter now as it's permanently out there. I don't know if it's true or not but I can see what they're getting at. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, Wile E Coyote said: Its exactly how it works. They decide if there is enough evidence to get a likely conviction. Without her evidence there is f**k all chance Didn’t work that way with Caroline Flack and her boyfriend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 “We don't need a court hearing to determine whether or not he's guilty.” Scary. ”I would however love to hear what you think Greenwood's side is though.” I’ve told you, I’ve no idea. You don’t think due process is necessary and you can’t follow a basic thread of discussion. Please, never serve on a jury.So you've no idea what the alternative is to how this lassie received these bruises and clear abuse on tape and yet you're still trying to kid on your better than those who have made a basic judgement going by what's been presented to them? Uh huh. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 1 minute ago, Charles Stiles said: From what I've seen a couple of times elsewhere, that could be a problem. Some are saying that by posting the video she has inadvertently made a fair trial virtually impossible meaning it can't go that far. It could be one reason it was taken down but of course that doesn't matter now as it's permanently out there. I don't know if it's true or not but I can see what they're getting at. Indeed. It’s more complex than things appear at first, at least in the criminal sense. I think his best hope is to avoid a criminal case and I’m sure he will have top lawyers. I can’t see him ever playing for Man Utd or England again. Will be surprised if he ever plays professional football at all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Just now, 19QOS19 said: So you've no idea what the alternative is to how this lassie received these bruises and clear abuse on tape and yet you're still trying to kid on your better than those who have made a basic judgement going by what's been presented to them? Uh huh. How could I possibly have any idea? The matter is still being investigated. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Greenwood banged that bird in Iceland after the England game 6 months ago when I assume he was with this girl. Her dad is clearly a huge fud. He should be wanting to leather Greenwood rather than support him. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wile E Coyote Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 6 minutes ago, Thorongil said: Didn’t work that way with Caroline Flack and her boyfriend. Apart from the fact the police turned up at the scene with her covered in blood and saying "I did it" its exactly the same. She wasn't convicted in court by the way 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 How could I possibly have any idea? The matter is still being investigated.If you don't have any reasonable alternative to hand then maybe lay off the folk who have seen and heard damning evidence and are choosing to trust their own senses. You're not better than people because you try and be edgy I'm afraid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasy23 Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 The quote from her Dad is a shocker, although there is a bit at the start of the quote which has been cut out of the screenshot going around. It adds a slightly different tone to it, but it's still a mental thing to say regardless. As others have pointed out, it does seem like his antics have been known amongst folk within football and the media, and that folk knew he had something like this hanging over him. I remember seeing a rumour on Twitter around a year ago of him having some sort of altercation with his girlfriend but nothing ever came of it. That comment on Reddit from last year isn't hard to believe. The more i think about it, the media buzz around him did seem to disappear pretty quickly last year, he went from being talked about every week as the next superstar, to going under the radar somewhat. In previous years his omission from the England squad would've been the subject of radio phone ins, endless articles etc but it was basically a non issue. The guy that tweeted this had previously reported that Greenwood had been taken in by police in December 2020. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted January 30, 2022 Author Share Posted January 30, 2022 The BBC is reporting that Frank Lampard has signed a 2.5 year deal with Everton - https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/60192650. His appointment will be confirmed officially tomorrow. Paul Clement is "in contention" to join the coaching team. Will Duncan Ferguson stay on? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smpar Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Please, never serve on a jury.I’m sure he’d be absolutely fine on a jury. This an internet chat forum, not a criminal courtroom. People are allowed to make very reasonable conclusions based on damning evidence. This sanctimonious “I refuse to comment until legal proceedings have taken place because I’m extremely intelligent” stance isn’t quite the look you think it is. 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Far too many folk on this planet think that you're a moron unless you're wedged on top of the fence. You're allowed to pick a side if one side is someone who beats and rapes women while being recorded, m8. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Left Back Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 Has he still got enough time to get his medical for Clyde before the window closes? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 (edited) 47 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said: If you don't have any reasonable alternative to hand then maybe lay off the folk who have seen and heard damning evidence and are choosing to trust their own senses. You're not better than people because you try and be edgy I'm afraid. I’m within my rights to think my opinion is better. Edited January 30, 2022 by Thorongil -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorongil Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 16 minutes ago, smpar said: I’m sure he’d be absolutely fine on a jury. This an internet chat forum, not a criminal courtroom. People are allowed to make very reasonable conclusions based on damning evidence. This sanctimonious “I refuse to comment until legal proceedings have taken place because I’m extremely intelligent” stance isn’t quite the look you think it is. It’s interesting that you see it that way, and it’s interesting that you are wrong again. I have commented. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.