ICTJohnboy Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 Good that Lizzy now looks like she's joined the anti-growth coalition! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 28 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Good that Lizzy now looks like she's joined the anti-growth coalition! Windsor? I thought she’d joined the decomposition coalition. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: They say capping bankers' bonuses forced firms to raise their salaries overall, to still attract the best people, so removing the cap likely won't make much difference. On the other hand it's likely to encourage more risk taking in the hope of boosting bonuses which was the point of the cap, to prevent another 2008. Were these the same "best people" in charge in 2008? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted October 18, 2022 Author Share Posted October 18, 2022 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 18 minutes ago, Clown Job said: Truss, Braverman & Coffey - all 3 of these idiotic idealogues need to be emptied. First Witch When shall we three meet again? In thunder, lightning, or in rain? Second Witch When the hurly-burly’s done, When the battle’s lost and won. Third Witch That will be ere the set of sun. First Witch Where the place? Second Witch Upon the heath. Third Witch There to meet with Macbeth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 19 minutes ago, Clown Job said: Yas, thought police. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 7 minutes ago, coprolite said: Yas, thought police. You might THINK that, but I wouldn't recommend it.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thane of Cawdor Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 27 minutes ago, coprolite said: Yas, thought police. Can't be long before Braverman begins to wonder how electorally popular capital punishment might be. And if my thought-dreams could be seen They’d probably put my head in a guillotine But it’s alright, Ma, it’s life, and life only 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurkst Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 It's like when Pink Floyd brought Dave Gilmour in to play guitar for the acid casualty Syd Barrett. A couple of weeks later... "Shall we pick Liz up for the gig tonight?" "Nah, just leave her." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Jacksgranda said: Were these the same "best people" in charge in 2008? Certainly, the bigger bonuses the traders earn, the bigger bonuses their directors get. Who cares if it all goes tits up when all your cash is squirrelled away offshore? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted October 18, 2022 Author Share Posted October 18, 2022 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 31 minutes ago, Thane of Cawdor said: Can't be long before Braverman begins to wonder how electorally popular capital punishment might be. And if my thought-dreams could be seen They’d probably put my head in a guillotine But it’s alright, Ma, it’s life, and life only Not an overwhelming majority but a small majority. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 30 minutes ago, Thane of Cawdor said: Can't be long before Braverman begins to wonder how electorally popular capital punishment might be. And if my thought-dreams could be seen They’d probably put my head in a guillotine But it’s alright, Ma, it’s life, and life only They've been wondering that for decades; the real question is when they'll feel safe enough to float the idea in the public consciousness as a "talking point" that they can deny wanting to implement, before returning to after a few years once the press have done the groundwork of making it acceptable to talk about. Plus, they'll need to withdraw from the ECHR first, something that's very much on the agenda. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Clown Job said: Braverman is trying desperately to "out nazi" Patel and is - quite remarkably - making a decent fist of it already. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 minute ago, Leith Green said: Braverman is trying desperately to "out nazi" Patel and is - quite remarkably - making a decent fist of it already. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, Clown Job said: Pensioners. Lock 'em up! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 1 hour ago, coprolite said: We’re already socialising the costs of risks taken by “too big to fail” pension funds who’ve leveraged their positions to boost returns. They want more of this. Big payments to financiers for taking risks with our money. still, I’m sure the black rock, Jp Morgan and hedge fund bodies on the economic advisory panel will put this right. Radio vox pops are increasingly terrifying. Where do they get these fuckwits. Barely coherent, no apparent understanding of reality but able to vote. In fairness to the pension funds, by nature they have to invest in order to pay out pensions (both current and future). The fundamental problem was that they'd taken 'prudent' investments in the UK Gilts (Gov Bonds), these were seen as stable investments with little volatility. They gave a 'safe' return with little movement in the underlying value of the bonds (so attracted less hedging costs etc). They (GILTS) were admittedly coming under pressure as inflation picked up and, the US started raising its interest rates, but still manageable, then... KamiKwasi said "hold my fackin beer" and spooked the market. Almost immediately rates rose as a 'moron premium' was required by buyers, which meant that Pension funds had to sell at a discount in order to raise the cash required to pay pensions. The important thing here is that they HAD to sell, which is a terrible position to be in, this then fuelled a downward price spiral until the BoE stepped in and bought the bonds back. So in summary the problems didn't stem from investing in high risk/high reward start ups or low credit/fast fluctuating markets. It came from investing in some of the traditionally most stable parts of the economy. In the long run, those of us with a bit of time to go before we take our pensions might see a bounce, as our money is currently being invested in higher yield bonds. But in the short term, it's an absolute Trusstastropy. Yours aDONis 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted October 18, 2022 Author Share Posted October 18, 2022 Tory UK 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted October 18, 2022 Share Posted October 18, 2022 3 minutes ago, aDONisSheep said: In fairness to the pension funds, by nature they have to invest in order to pay out pensions (both current and future). The fundamental problem was that they'd taken 'prudent' investments in the UK Gilts (Gov Bonds), these were seen as stable investments with little volatility. They gave a 'safe' return with little movement in the underlying value of the bonds (so attracted less hedging costs etc). They (GILTS) were admittedly coming under pressure as inflation picked up and, the US started raising its interest rates, but still manageable, then... KamiKwasi said "hold my fackin beer" and spooked the market. Almost immediately rates rose as a 'moron premium' was required by buyers, which meant that Pension funds had to sell at a discount in order to raise the cash required to pay pensions. The important thing here is that they HAD to sell, which is a terrible position to be in, this then fuelled a downward price spiral until the BoE stepped in and bought the bonds back. So in summary the problems didn't stem from investing in high risk/high reward start ups or low credit/fast fluctuating markets. It came from investing in some of the traditionally most stable parts of the economy. In the long run, those of us with a bit of time to go before we take our pensions might see a bounce, as our money is currently being invested in higher yield bonds. But in the short term, it's an absolute Trusstastropy. Yours aDONis Investing the funds directly in the full value of gilts would have been low risk. By investing on margin accounts they've effectively turned their investment into a gilt based derivative with a completely different risk profile- higher yield but with a liquidity risk on the downside that's just not there on unleveraged bonds. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.