Monarchy debate/discussion

[Mr Waldo]

2 hours ago, Suspect Device said:

 

 

Do I have to say allegedly on this?

Have a Charles 

[btb]

14 hours ago, aDONisSheep said:

Sorry but this debate has left me behind.

 

I had asssumed that anyone witnessing a jug eared twat, being driven in a golden horse driven carriage, to be presented with a ridiculous hat, and then being driven back in a different golden horse driven carriage, would think... this is mental!  Have we lost our collective minds!

I have to ask myself if I'm missing something?

 

Yours

aDONis 

On the one hand this is far less important than them being shameless grifting hypocrites on the other their future relies on them being in tune with the Great British Public - IMO these revelations will have little effect on the latter.

ETA - I note The Grauniad has become the first major newspaper to name names.

Royals and race: inquiry under way into naming of Charles and Catherine in new book | Monarchy | The Guardian

Edited November 30, 2023 by btb

[Aim Here]

11 hours ago, btb said:

On the one hand this is far less important than them being shameless grifting hypocrites on the other their future relies on them being in tune with the Great British Public - IMO these revelations will have little effect on the latter.

ETA - I note The Grauniad has become the first major newspaper to name names.

Royals and race: inquiry under way into naming of Charles and Catherine in new book | Monarchy | The Guardian

From the article:

Quote

The book claims conversations about Archie related to how it opened up discussions about whether there was “unconscious bias” in the royal family.

Dunno why they should think there's unconscious racial bias in the Royal Family. Everything points to most of them being very consciously and deliberately racist.

[SandyCromarty]

The little home counties englanders will be incensed at the latest treachery from the Sussexes and will be calling for Harry and Meghan to be transported to the Colonies.

[SandyCromarty]

On 20/07/2023 at 19:43, Granny Danger said:

This would be obscene at the best of times, but with health workers being told they should accept below inflation rises it goes beyond obscene.

Details published by Treasury show royal family’s grant is expected to increase from £86m to £125m in 2025
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/20/king-charles-to-receive-huge-pay-rise-from-uk-taxpayers

Get these c***s in the bin.

ETA that’s a 45% increase.

 

What also angers me is that after years of moaning Elizabeth finally got her hands on Crown Estate money, a few years back the Crown Estate handed over £15 million to her and this sum will always increase year on year for the monarch, money which belongs to you and I the people.

It goes back to George 111 when at that time he and monarchs before him paid for the military and the government etc from the crown estate, he like many before him complained bitterly over this so to resolve it he handed the crown estate over to the government absolutely and for all time and for the monies to be used for the public purse. In return the government created the Civil List and handed money over every year since.

Every monarch since then has wanted that money back and Elizabeth finally got it, not content with her massive income from the Duchy of Lancaster and inherited wealth she deliberately stole what is not hers from us.

Another government argument with her is when she travelled on overseas trips she was head of state and any gifts given by foreign countries belong to the UK, she adamantly argued against this keeping all gifts as personal to her.

Windsor Castle, Sandringham, Balmoral, Clarence House and Kensington all fully staffed year round plus countless other houses.

Their greed is beyond measure.

Edited December 3, 2023 by SandyCromarty

[BFTD]

On 01/12/2023 at 00:54, Aim Here said:

From the article:

Dunno why they should think there's unconscious racial bias in the Royal Family. Everything points to most of them being very consciously and deliberately racist.

It's a bit weird that anyone would be surprised that an impossibly wealthy and isolated 75-year-old Boomer might not be terribly keen on his bloodline being tainted by people with a funny tinge. Not exactly an uncommon view with people of that vintage, never mind one whose entire existence literally relies on the pretence that they and their ancestors have been divinely blessed through birth.

If true, our future Queen is just your standard upper crust cuntress.

[tamthebam]

I suppose you could argue that Catherine, unlike many of her more enlightened contemporaries, did not realise she was being racist as she is a bit thick.

But we'll never know.

[SandyCromarty]

On 04/12/2023 at 01:44, tamthebam said:

I suppose you could argue that Catherine, unlike many of her more enlightened contemporaries, did not realise she was being racist as she is a bit thick.

But we'll never know.

Queen Kate and King Willie could well turn out to be instrumental towards Scottish Independence given their obvious dislike of visiting or staying in our country with their preference to hobknobbing with their aristocratic friends in London and Norfolk.

St Andrews doesn't count.

[O'Kelly Isley III]

The hand-wringing over the wean's colour is rather ridiculous when set against the fact that his father looks awfully like James Hewitt.  Maybe Omid Scobie should look into that next.

[SandyCromarty]

20 hours ago, O'Kelly Isley III said:

The hand-wringing over the wean's colour is rather ridiculous when set against the fact that his father looks awfully like James Hewitt.  Maybe Omid Scobie should look into that next.

Illegitamacy within monarchies is considered as normal? James 1/V1 was more than likely Rizzo's son given his swarthy complexion and no way did the Duke of Kent father Queen Victoria.

The heir was essential regardless of covered up parentage.

Prince Andrew looks nothing like his siblings which all points to Elizabeth's relationship with her racing manager the Duke of Porchester.

Then there's the great difference in.looks between Beatrice and Eugenie indicating a likeness between Eugenie and Fergies Texan lover.

The list goes on and on.

 

[Billy Jean King]

6 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

Illegitamacy within monarchies is considered as normal? James 1/V1 was more than likely Rizzo's son given his swarthy complexion and no way did the Duke of Kent father Queen Victoria.

The heir was essential regardless of covered up parentage.

Prince Andrew looks nothing like his siblings which all points to Elizabeth's relationship with her racing manager the Duke of Porchester.

Then there's the great difference in.looks between Beatrice and Eugenie indicating a likeness between Eugenie and Fergies Texan lover.

The list goes on and on.

 

So James 1 may have been conceived at a drive-in  ?

[btb]

6 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

Illegitamacy within monarchies is considered as normal? James 1/V1 was more than likely Rizzo's son given his swarthy complexion and no way did the Duke of Kent father Queen Victoria.

The heir was essential regardless of covered up parentage.

Prince Andrew looks nothing like his siblings which all points to Elizabeth's relationship with her racing manager the Duke of Porchester.

Then there's the great difference in.looks between Beatrice and Eugenie indicating a likeness between Eugenie and Fergies Texan lover.

The list goes on and on.

 

Probably better to go that way than pursue purity in the bloodline - you might find the podcast below interesting.

Hapsburg Inbreeding with Dr. Adam Rutherford - Not Just the Tudors | Acast

[SandyCromarty]

2 hours ago, btb said:

Probably better to go that way than pursue purity in the bloodline - you might find the podcast below interesting.

Hapsburg Inbreeding with Dr. Adam Rutherford - Not Just the Tudors | Acast

Monarchical rampant Inbreeding??

Ignorant and a classic Dumbkopf George V married his cousin Kleptomaniac Mary.

They had five sons;

The eldest was an idiot and a nazi.

Next was an alcoholic homosexual.

Another was a drug addict.

And there was the bad tempered stammering alcoholic.

And last the epelectic who died at 13 during a seizure.

Two Kings and Two Dukes and all idiots.

[BFTD]

10 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

Illegitamacy within monarchies is considered as normal? James 1/V1 was more than likely Rizzo's son given his swarthy complexion and no way did the Duke of Kent father Queen Victoria.

The heir was essential regardless of covered up parentage.

Prince Andrew looks nothing like his siblings which all points to Elizabeth's relationship with her racing manager the Duke of Porchester.

Then there's the great difference in.looks between Beatrice and Eugenie indicating a likeness between Eugenie and Fergies Texan lover.

The list goes on and on.

@Rizzo

Some explaining to do, young lady.

[SandyCromarty]

7 hours ago, BFTD said:

@Rizzo

Some explaining to do, young lady.

Apologies for getting the name wrong, Rizzio was an Italian courtier very close to Mary Queen of Scots, Darnley, Mary's husband became insanely jealous of Rizzio and murdered him in Holyrood Palace on the motive that Rizzio had got Mary pregnant.

If you do a tour of the Palace the guide will show some brownish stains on a section of flooring which legend states is Rizzo's blood.

 

 

[btb]

10 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

Monarchical rampant Inbreeding??

Ignorant and a classic Dumbkopf George V married his cousin Kleptomaniac Mary.

They had five sons;

The eldest was an idiot and a nazi.

Next was an alcoholic homosexual.

Another was a drug addict.

And there was the bad tempered stammering alcoholic.

And last the epelectic who died at 13 during a seizure.

Two Kings and Two Dukes and all idiots.

Still wouldn't match the Hapsburgs in terms of physical degeneracy, they deliberately married to close relatives (usually uncle/niece) over 200 years and the last one was severely disabled, had to eat behind a curtain cos he couldn't keep all the food in his mouth, both his wives complained he was impotent - he finally died aged 39 with no offspring. 

Geneticist looking at his family tree reckon he would have been more inbred than the offspring of a brother and sister.

*********************

The longevity of Liz & Phil plus their sprogs suggest there's been some outbreeding somewhere. 

[SandyCromarty]

1 hour ago, btb said:

Still wouldn't match the Hapsburgs in terms of physical degeneracy, they deliberately married to close relatives (usually uncle/niece) over 200 years and the last one was severely disabled, had to eat behind a curtain cos he couldn't keep all the food in his mouth, both his wives complained he was impotent - he finally died aged 39 with no offspring. 

Geneticist looking at his family tree reckon he would have been more inbred than the offspring of a brother and sister.

*********************

The longevity of Liz & Phil plus their sprogs suggest there's been some outbreeding somewhere. 

Consider Albert and Victoria's large brood who were married off to royal cousins throughout Europe, mental abberrations, blood disorders and limb deformity in the case of the Kaiser were common.

 

[Mark Connolly]

There is a plaque in Holyroodhouse marking the spot where Rizzio fell.

Not that much of a shock to be honest, I nearly tripped over it myself.

 

 

 

 

 

Joke credit: Jack Milroy and Rikki Fulton

[Rizzo]

15 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

If you do a tour of the Palace the guide will show some brownish stains on a section of flooring which legend states is Rizzo's blood.

Could well be tbf, I'm clumsy af.

[sophia]

30 minutes ago, scottish tory said:

The bitterness and rancour of the left never ceases to amaze.

So often reduced to personal insults, which strangely are OK so long is its a member of the royal family (or anyone generally perceived as right wing).

Yet, lefties seem to genuinely think they are the 'nice' and 'kind' people!

Yes, they should think very carefully about the future.

I feel very strongly about those that comment with such crass insensitivity