Jump to content

Next permanent Scotland manager


Richey Edwards

.  

253 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Suspect Device said:

 

Someone is lying but given that it involves a lot of politicians., it's hard to know who.

I don't get the concern about this, he voted for same sex marriage in the initial stages, the bill passed with a huge majority so his vote wasn't needed to pass the bill, whether or not he deliberately timed his undoubtedly important meeting to avoid upsetting his Mosque and community doesn't seem like a huge issue to me. No doubt Kate Forbes will have similar problems balancing political responsibilities, faith and the opinions of her church in her political career, she could have chosen to suspend her maternity leave for a day for the GRR vote if she'd wanted, 6 months after her child was born, and launching a leadership election campaign a few weeks later.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/03/2023 at 18:12, Granny Danger said:

More homophobe sympathisers on here than I expected tbh.  Hopefully they are not representative of the wider membership.

Oh you and your casting of stones 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I don't get the concern about this, he voted for same sex marriage in the initial stage, the bill passed with a huge majority so his vote wasn't needed to pass the bill, whether or not he deliberately timed his undoubtedly important meeting to avoid upsetting his Mosque and community doesn't seem like a huge issue to me. No doubt Kate Forbes will have similar problems balancing political responsibilities, faith and the opinions of her church in her political career, she could have chosen to suspend her maternity leave for a day for the GRR vote if she'd wanted, 6 months after her child was born, and launching a leadership election campaign a few weeks later.

It's just a question of honesty. I'd rather be told the truth about someone's views who I disagree with (Forbes) than be lied to by someone.

Honesty is more important to me.

 

Edited by Suspect Device
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I don't get the concern about this, he voted for same sex marriage in the initial stage, the bill passed with a huge majority so his vote wasn't needed to pass the bill, whether or not he deliberately timed his undoubtedly important meeting to avoid upsetting his Mosque and community doesn't seem like a huge issue to me. No doubt Kate Forbes will have similar problems balancing political responsibilities, faith and the opinions of her church in her political career, she could have chosen to suspend her maternity leave for a day for the GRR vote if she'd wanted, 6 months after her child was born.

You're right, it's all so last week and most agree that it's now time to get on with debating the substantive matters in a civilised fashion. It'll only be important if Humza plays dirty on it but that is well nigh impossible as his hypocrisy would just be up there in technicolour.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

It's just a question of honesty. I'd rather be told the truth about someone's views who I disagree with (Forbes) than be lied to by someone.

Honesty to me is more important to me.

 

Politics is about reconciling disparate views to get things done, total honesty and frankness would be toxic in any kind of negotiation. Do you honestly think Kate Forbes is being straightforward about all her beliefs?

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will listen to the remaining hustings, but I'm still of a mind that I can't reconcile voting for someone to lead my party who is openly opposed to equal marriage rights, right to chose and so on, with my membership of a party that posits itself as progressive. 

I'm not impressed with any of the candidates for various reasons, but what is leaning me toward Humza is that he is the only one who recognises the importance of challenging the S35. It's not purely the fact that I am in favour of the bill, I can not see how I am supposed to take seriously a candidate that is strident about their belief in Scots Independence, yet will happily sit back and watch a Westminster government deny the will of the democratically elected Scots Parliament. It's an untenable position for any pro-Indi FM. It must be challenged on a point of principle. The likelihood or otherwise of a successful outcome is immaterial. The only argument that holds any credence is the 'stop wasting money on this' one, but then all governments spend a bloody fortune on enacting policy, including fighting legal battles, so I don't see this as any different or any less justifiable.

Champagne moment so far is Anas Sarwar decrying the quality of the candidates. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Leith Green said:

 

The SNP should be a socialist alternative to (what passes for) Labour, not apeing them.

The SNP a 'socialist' alternative 😆😆...That's Plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Suspect Device said:

Honesty is more important to me.

This.

I really don't understand why Humza would lie about something like this where he gains so little advantage. He has been the same way as minister tbh, a lack of political judgement.

If I had a vote I would spoil my ballot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/03/2023 at 11:41, welshbairn said:

I'm supposed on a "waitlist" for the Inverness hustings on Saturday, haven't heard anything and the venue only holds 250. No idea how they decide who gets a ticket but as I haven't exactly been active in the party I'll probably be low down the pecking order. If it's the same around the country only a small proportion of members will get to see what the candidates are about, unmitigated and filtered by journalists. They should definitely be streamed, at the very least to members only if that's possible.

I got a ticket for Aberdeen through Eventbrite although it's a decent size venue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, betting competition said:

I got a ticket for Aberdeen through Eventbrite although it's a decent size venue.

I ended up getting one too but I probably won't go now that they're streaming them. 

P.S. Cancelled my ticket, easier than I thought. 

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Trogdor said:

This.

I really don't understand why Humza would lie about something like this where he gains so little advantage. He has been the same way as minister tbh, a lack of political judgement.

If I had a vote I would spoil my ballot.

Not sure what he's supposed to have lied about. He had an important meeting at the time of the vote, nobody disputes this. Whether the timing was deliberately convenient is neither here nor there, and he voted for the bill twice before. Politics isn't always straightforward, sometimes people have to balance their own opinions with representing constituents, communities and party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH if the Humza/Pakistani Consulate thing was a deliberate contrivance, I can almost understand it. You have to balance the benefit of continued trust and a good relationship between significant figures in the Scottish Muslim community and a significant Muslim member of the Scottish Government, v's potentially antagonising and alienating those people, and the few rare bad eggs who tend to jump straight to extremes. He has himself stated that he has received threats to his and his family's wellbeing from members of his own faith, and if that is true I would imagine the police might well have advised him to take that very seriously. I couldn't blame him if he recused himself, and I also wouldn't be remotely surprised if he was offered a convenient 'get out' by some sympathetic members of his religion.

I'm not entirely excusing Yousaf for deliberately missing a vote that was problematic for him personally, but the difference for me in respect to this and Forbes opting not to vote in the GRR bill, is that one is vocal about their support and the other open about their disapproval. You can suggest Humza is the bigger hypocrite, and I'd agree, however I still would not accept that Yousaf as FM presents the same potential threat to rights that Forbes does. It's fine and well for Forbes to say she has no plans to roll back existing laws and remove existing rights, but what about future hypotheticals? If I had to put money on which of the two I believe is most likely to deliberately stand in the way of further legislation that expands the rights of minority groups, I know which of the two that would be. "Most likely" does not mean I think it is likely, or even somewhat likely to actually happen, but I'd rather err on the side of caution and not help facilitate it in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...