Jump to content

#Barclays 23/24


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Salvo Montalbano said:

With that rumour and the one about Todd Boelly looking at an American basketball coach for Chelsea to have a "Ted Lasso effect", we could really be in for some banter years.

It's like cheating in Champ Manager yet still being shite & losing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ICTChris said:

I see there are rumours that Man Utd are looking at Gareth Southgate as manager if/when Ten Hag leaves at the end of the season - seems like a ready made disaster to me.

Sounds lovely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everton will be looking at the Chelsea case with interest considering their points deduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Comrie said:

Everton will be looking at the Chelsea case with interest considering their points deduction.

Why? It says in the post that Chelsea lost 90.1 million - that will be well within the sustainability margins. For all Chelsea's crazy spending, they always manage to sell off academy graduates for decent money, and those players aren't amortised in the same way signings are so they make decent "profits" on them as far as the books go. Amortising the big spends over 7, 8 or even 9 years will also help and now the PL have banned that, nobody else can do it. The issue they'll have will be in a few years if they can't sell any more academy graduates or they can't recoup any of the fees they've laid out on the likes of Caicedo, Fernandez, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Salvo Montalbano said:

Why? It says in the post that Chelsea lost 90.1 million - that will be well within the sustainability margins. For all Chelsea's crazy spending, they always manage to sell off academy graduates for decent money, and those players aren't amortised in the same way signings are so they make decent "profits" on them as far as the books go. Amortising the big spends over 7, 8 or even 9 years will also help and now the PL have banned that, nobody else can do it. The issue they'll have will be in a few years if they can't sell any more academy graduates or they can't recoup any of the fees they've laid out on the likes of Caicedo, Fernandez, etc.

Amortising the spend on transfers will be why it’s only £90m for one year

however not all the loss will actually count for profit and sustainability purposes. Losses that are attributed things like infrastructure investment and running the women’s team can be ignored so their effective loss for P&S will be smaller

Everton’s unadjusted numbers were on a similar scale to Chelsea’s for multiple years 

So this season alone probably doesn’t land them in trouble but they lost money in previous years so it leaves them in a very difficult situation with little room to manoeuvre and a bunch of players nobody els wants to sign, commanding wages nobody else wants to pay  

Edited by topcat(The most tip top)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure it’s averaged out over a few years anyway? It’s not like one bad season means you’re in the shit.

I’m sure Everton fans will be all over it though with their whole innocent victims thing.

Edited by eez-eh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, eez-eh said:

Pretty sure it’s averaged out over a few years anyway? It’s not like one bad season means you’re in the shit.

I’m sure Everton fans will be all over it though with their whole innocent victims thing.

It is averaged out but it’s not as if they’ve been anywhere near breaking even up to now

https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/chelsea-fc-2021-22-financial-results#:~:text=The above contributed to the,loss of £121.3 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Zetterlund said:

I started watching this just after the goal and Man U have been atrocious. Not sure they've put more than 2 passes together a single time.

Yep, both teams look shit but Man U have barely strung a pass together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...