BFTD Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago I keep banging on about this, but the answer is a bigger bottom tier and more relegation to/promotion from the Lowland/Highland leagues. Nobody's going to be happy about backing a system where you're highly unlikely to ever return from a demotion. Regardless, any change will require admission of Celtgers reserves, so none of this matters. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FairWeatherFan Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 7 minutes ago, rockson said: That could mean two out of ten clubs (twenty percent of them - in other words a fifth) being relegated. I submit that is a mad proposal. Surley no division in the world relegates a fifth of its clubs. Don't have to look very far. Its one of the divisions you are in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockson Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 minute ago, FairWeatherFan said: Don't have to look very far. Its one of the divisions you are in. Aye. Fair enough. (I'd managed to forget the play-offs could do that. Blanked it out of my memory.) Edited 19 hours ago by rockson 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiegoDiego Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 11 hours ago, Tenkay said: I know nobody on here wants to see East Kilbride or Caley Braves in the league it seems, but if they win the league they'll have earned their place. Highland league champs (and club 42) beg to differ. 1 hour ago, rockson said: That could mean two out of ten clubs (twenty percent of them - in other words a fifth) being relegated. I submit that is a mad proposal. Surley no division in the world relegates a fifth of its clubs. Thought I'd fact check this, started alphabetically and saw that the ten-club Albanian top flight relegates two and third bottom enters a relegation play off. Edited 18 hours ago by DiegoDiego 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago When the Lowland League get rid of B teams and the Highland League actually take promotion seriously we can have a discussion about opening up more relegation places. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, The Moonster said: When the Lowland League get rid of B teams and the Highland League actually take promotion seriously we can have a discussion about opening up more relegation places. This is the correct answer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moorie Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 13 hours ago, BFTD said: I keep banging on about this, but the answer is a bigger bottom tier and more relegation to/promotion from the Lowland/Highland leagues. Nobody's going to be happy about backing a system where you're highly unlikely to ever return from a demotion. Regardless, any change will require admission of Celtgers reserves, so none of this matters. For a HL stand point it wouldn’t work. Only 3/4 would be interested in going up. Of course if more teams go down from the league more will be eager to go back up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Moorie said: For a HL stand point it wouldn’t work. Only 3/4 would be interested in going up. Of course if more teams go down from the league more will be eager to go back up Folk keep saying that - it must be some league. You'd think Elgin might be interested in a return to the Highland glory days after nearly a quarter of a century sitting in the bottom half of League Two, but their fans on here usually deny that. Funny that the only League Two side to have been relegated to it so far have been camped out at the top of the table ever since, even after the parachute payments stopped, and seem quite keen to get back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 23 hours ago, Blue1870 said: Me yes my point is basically some of the grounds are not the best only an opinion. Either it's an astro inside a cage with one tiny stand and poor facilities etc all money orientated or old ground with awful facilities with loads of work needing done. You've got forfar and Stranraer where you can watch from 4 sides. Covered seating covered terracing open terracing and decent facilities. Both our teams had to spend a fair bit to get grounds looking like this. Important to remember that the then-SFL sides had access to a lot of post-Taylor Report funding for grounds that wasn't available to non-league clubs. For example, the bulk of the funding to seat the Shed and build a new main stand at Stair Park came from the Football Trust and the local council. Around the same time Linlithgow Rose funded the Davie Roy Stand themselves. Also, if we're talking about old grounds with awful facilities and loads of work needing done, we need to talk about Albion Rovers, who have one prehistoric (but deservedly loved) stand and a small concrete terrace behind one goal. The condemned covered terrace opposite is the biggest ruin in the pyramid. And many of the astro cages are better grounds for the level than places like the Falkirk Stadium, in which a couple of hundred people are spread out in a single stand of about 4,000 seats to watch East Stirling. Are we really saying that watching East Kilbride is a more soulless experience than watching Clyde? East Fife, Stirling Albion and Dumbarton are one-stand grounds too (or only open one stand) while Stenhousemuir and Annan have one stand and an end terrace. The four-sided grounds you mention aren't ubiquitous in the SPFL. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, doulikefish said: This is the correct answer It's not, it's a ridiculous answer. It's bad enough that good clubs in the Lowland League are stuck with B teams and fake clubs like Broomhill, but we have to be punished again because we happen to be in the same league as them? And in the Highland League, ambitious clubs are to be punished because of the shenanigans of one club, Buckie Thistle? Limiting promotion and relegation to collectively punish all the clubs in a league because of the low integrity of some of their members is, when you think it through, obviously irrational and unfair. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 14 minutes ago, GordonS said: It's not, it's a ridiculous answer. It's bad enough that good clubs in the Lowland League are stuck with B teams and fake clubs like Broomhill, but we have to be punished again because we happen to be in the same league as them? And in the Highland League, ambitious clubs are to be punished because of the shenanigans of one club, Buckie Thistle? Limiting promotion and relegation to collectively punish all the clubs in a league because of the low integrity of some of their members is, when you think it through, obviously irrational and unfair. The Lowland League can open up their relegation places then, so as to be fair to the regional leagues below them, and maybe you can rid yourselves of "fake clubs" and B teams. Screaming about unfair the big bad SPFL are when your league does the exact same thing is hilarious hypocrisy, especially when your league has teams who literally just paid each team enough money to compete. The Highland League will be taken seriously when the winners of the division don't go for a piss up abroad when the play off is happening, or just altogether "forget" to apply for a criteria exemption that would allow them to participate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrison Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, The Moonster said: The Highland League will be taken seriously when the winners of the division don't go for a piss up abroad when the play off is happening, or just altogether "forget" to apply for a criteria exemption that would allow them to participate. Two scenarios a decade apart condemns a whole league. You're funny. As for the LL part, while you may have a point, it's incredibly childish for SPFL2 and LL to point at each other sneering about wanting the other to budge first before they do what's obviously the right thing to do from a sporting integrity viewpoint... But here we are. As we have been for years between here for the LL General thread. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, morrison said: Two scenarios a decade apart condemns a whole league. You're funny. As for the LL part, while you may have a point, it's incredibly childish for SPFL2 and LL to point at each other sneering about wanting the other to budge first before they do what's obviously the right thing to do from a sporting integrity viewpoint... But here we are. As we have been for years between here for the LL General thread. Yes it's a shame the HL teams mentality hasn't changed in a decade and there's still teams doing all they can to avoid promotion. The Lowland League voted in B teams when they had been unanimously rejected on several occasions by SPFL clubs, funnily enough on sporting integrity grounds. The Lowland League don't have any moral high ground to take, if you don't like being f**ked up the arse don't bend over and open your cheeks for the Old Firm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
To B or not B Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, GordonS said: It's not, it's a ridiculous answer. It's bad enough that good clubs in the Lowland League are stuck with B teams and fake clubs like Broomhill, but we have to be punished again because we happen to be in the same league as them? And in the Highland League, ambitious clubs are to be punished because of the shenanigans of one club, Buckie Thistle? Limiting promotion and relegation to collectively punish all the clubs in a league because of the low integrity of some of their members is, when you think it through, obviously irrational and unfair. Why doesn’t your club put forward a proposal to be voted on then. All we heard, certainly when we were in the league, was the East league clubs moaning about lack of ventilation. We now have several ex East clubs in the LL and not a single one of them has put forward a proposal to change it, as far as I am aware. Is it a case of now we are there we don’t need to worry about it and sod the clubs left in the East? You can also moan about being “punished” but like them or loath them the “fake” clubs have been in the league for a long time now while certain clubs were happy to poo poo the LL because they didn’t want to take the leap of faith from the ill fated juniors. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1993 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, BFTD said: Folk keep saying that - it must be some league. You'd think Elgin might be interested in a return to the Highland glory days after nearly a quarter of a century sitting in the bottom half of League Two, but their fans on here usually deny that. Funny that the only League Two side to have been relegated to it so far have been camped out at the top of the table ever since, even after the parachute payments stopped, and seem quite keen to get back. Geography and all that entails is the reason HL clubs don’t want promoted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted 28 minutes ago Share Posted 28 minutes ago 1 hour ago, 1993 said: Geography and all that entails is the reason HL clubs don’t want promoted. Why on Earth did they join the pyramid? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowdenleith Posted 26 minutes ago Share Posted 26 minutes ago 6 hours ago, The Moonster said: When the Lowland League get rid of B teams and the Highland League actually take promotion seriously we can have a discussion about opening up more relegation places. It’s a nice convenient excuse, but once the b teams are gone (and I fully believe they will next time the vote comes up), the teams and fans will find some other reasons that it’s not the right time. And I wouldn’t blame any of you. You know that’s true, the welcome mat of automatic promotion/relegation will not be rolled out, once the current idiosyncrasies are ironed out with the LL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowdenleith Posted 20 minutes ago Share Posted 20 minutes ago (edited) 3 hours ago, The Moonster said: The Lowland League voted in B teams when they had been unanimously rejected on several occasions by SPFL clubs, funnily enough on sporting integrity grounds. The Lowland League don't have any moral high ground to take, if you don't like being f**ked up the arse don't bend over and open your cheeks for the Old Firm. Think I pointed out this inconsistency to yourself a year or so back, certainly a Dumbarton fan. You guys are all high and mighty about B teams, but you love the old firm when they give you loan players on the cheap to help develop them for someone else. I think it might have been last season when you got promoted, did you have 3 or 4 including your star goalie? Not so bad then are they? And I’m not singling your team out in particular, just sticks in the mind. Edited 18 minutes ago by Cowdenleith 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Tarmo Posted 9 minutes ago Share Posted 9 minutes ago 4 hours ago, GordonS said: And in the Highland League, ambitious clubs are to be punished because of the shenanigans of one club, Buckie Thistle? Brora as well tbf. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted 3 minutes ago Share Posted 3 minutes ago 9 minutes ago, Cowdenleith said: Think I pointed out this inconsistency to yourself a year or so back, certainly a Dumbarton fan. You guys are all high and mighty about B teams, but you love the old firm when they give you loan players on the cheap to help develop them for someone else. I think it might have been last season when you got promoted, did you have 3 or 4 including your star goalie? Not so bad then are they? And I’m not singling your team out in particular, just sticks in the mind. They're still terrible because they've manipulated the youth market to their own advantage by hoovering up as many young players as possible in an attempt to avoid paying for them further down the development path, on the slim chance that they ever reach a level where Celtgers might actually be interested. These players would be at clubs like Dumbarton anyway. This isn't difficult stuff. It's what the big teams across Europe have been doing for some time, and it's harmed the game overall. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.