If you agree that attacking the SNP gains nothing then why bother? Maybe unionists should try a different approach, like having actual policies to share with us.
Buckinghamshire. What a place.
https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/19223482.address-bucks-councils-childrens-services-failures/
https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/politics/18787782.buckinghamshire-council-keeping-head-down-possible-failures-provide-free-home-to-school-transport/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/parents-sue-over-son-s-failure-in-11-plus-exam-710396.html
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/oct/01/privilege-is-alive-and-well-in-the-chilterns
No examples? Just something you made up in your head then?
And now it's the last decade, and not more than 20 years?
Seriously, you have chronic mythomania.
I don't think that's true at all. When I lived in Scotland nobody was talking about independence being inevitable. The SNP were still a fairly small party.
But since they were so vocal, you must have plenty of examples.
Selkirk was the last place I lived before moving to the States. Every time I went to a pub it was filled with auld, dour faced c***s.
Then you look at housing schemes like Bannerfield and wonder why they vote for this.
For a referendum it should only be residents who get a say. For elections it's a bit different. You get a vote for 15 years after you leave the country but I think they're changing this as well.
Sure people who live in Scotland can vote. Just like people who move away from Scotland can still express political opinions on independence.
The rest of your ramblings are just the usual nonsense we've all come to expect.