Jump to content

The New Raith Rovers Thread


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Fae_the_'briggs said:

He's the Manager, he would have been consulted, he didn't try and block the move though or threaten to resign if it went ahead. He was complicit even if he was not the main instigator. 

You are, I’m afraid, correct. JMcG has pretty much destroyed his legacy at Raith with an, at least, ill-considered decision, if not more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Fae_the_'briggs said:

Sounds like McGlynn is getting it fairly easy even though he must have been  involved in the decision to sign that player.  Can it be that Raith supporters are so fickle that they seem to overlook his part in this tawdry episode just because he's been a reasonably successful manager for them. 

If you go back a few pages you'll be able to read a fairly lengthy debate on this with various viewpoints.

But in short, those who have a bit of sympathy/goodwill for McGlynn feel that way not because of results on the park, but because of how good he has been for the club behind the scenes, not just in footballing matters.

And those that feel he needs to go feel that, as you say, he was complicit even if he wasn't the main instigator (which we don't know for sure).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevoraith said:

If you go back a few pages you'll be able to read a fairly lengthy debate on this with various viewpoints.

But in short, those who have a bit of sympathy/goodwill for McGlynn feel that way not because of results on the park, but because of how good he has been for the club behind the scenes, not just in footballing matters.

And those that feel he needs to go feel that, as you say, he was complicit even if he wasn't the main instigator (which we don't know for sure).

His Jacket would surely be on a slack nail anyway with this run of results continuing

Edited by SirJimmyofNic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd rather get as much information and perspective about the whole thing before committing either way to how I feel at the moment it's a fucking mess. From what Bill Clark is saying even he doesn't know the fullness of events and he's on the board at the time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fae_the_'briggs said:

He's the Manager, he would have been consulted, he didn't try and block the move though or threaten to resign if it went ahead. He was complicit even if he was not the main instigator. 

How do you know what Mcglynn did or didn't do? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McGlynn has been a very good appointment for Raith Rovers and its probably natural that a section of their support will back him because of that, but I just wonder if you'd been down in the relegation area and had an Allan Johnston type record of results, if the support for him would have been so forgiving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some clubs run like that, where the chairman is basically playing fantasy football and his manager is more or less a lackey with far less say over transfer dealings than fans like to imagine. Think Jimmy Thomson under Alex Penman.

I've never got the impression that the current Raith set-up is like that, but others will know better than me. Did McGlynn identify Goodwillie as a target, or was he offered him and did he just say "well from a football point of view only he'd obviously be great, but whether that's a road you want to go down is a matter for the board"?

One scenario is less bad than the other, but I don't know if even that should be enough to save him, for me. Clark's comments have muddied the waters though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CALDERON said:

How do you know what Mcglynn did or didn't do? 

I dont know, do you or any of the posters on this subject, but do you actually think he was clueless on this until the player's contract was signed and announced? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do wonder if Clark is coming at it from the perspective of being a Raith fan and seeing the work John has done over the last few seasons, knowing that we're unlikely to get anyone better.

Fans voting with their feet today. Throughout the January window, the club had been quite vocal about reaching 1500 season ticket holders. Attendance today: 1136. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way I'm having it that McGlynn want involved. He had to, at least, sign it off. And remember when he was asked weeks ago he didn't exactly deny it.

And if somehow he wasn't involved and was just told Goodwillie was coming in and that's that then that is equally worrying.

If you look at his comments when he was signed and then on Tuesday pre match I think it was clear McGlynn was more than happy to have him at the club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pub car king said:

I think I'd rather get as much information and perspective about the whole thing before committing either way to how I feel at the moment it's a fucking mess. From what Bill Clark is saying even he doesn't know the fullness of events and he's on the board at the time.  

Agreed. 

This will however require a full explanation from John McGlynn, who seems keen to avoid the matter. Similarly, Sim and the board need to front up as well and stop hiding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this stage, I don't think that's a bad decision. We saw the fallout from Benedictus being sent out after Tuesday's game. 

The caveat to that is that there must be more communication from the club in the coming days. 

It shouldn't be for the players to answer for the actions of the board and, to whatever extent, the manager. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ro Sham Bo said:

Something about supporting Goodwillie. Didn't see it myself but heard someone say that's what it said. Caused a bit of a furore with a woman in the row in front of me turning round and unsurprisingly doing her nut at them. 

Grim stuff. 

This is exactly why I can’t face going back to a game yet.

Goodwillie might well be away from the club but the toxicity of this whole fiasco still leaves a nasty effect behind - whatever side of the fence your opinion falls on.

Folk making banners to support him won’t have a clue what feelings they’re potentially stirring up in those round about them. They’ll think it’s a laugh or they’ll think they’re being edgy and a dangerous few might even think they’re making a moral stand. That’s the sort of attitude we can all put on ignore on social media or forums but in real life it’s not like that.

With everything else happening in the country / world right now, it can sometimes feel like we’re living in a powder keg. This is not something we need to experience whilst we sit amongst our fellow supporters, and escape for a bit, on a Saturday afternoon. 

Creating clarity on the way forward needs to be the clubs priority right now. I appreciate there will be a lot going on behind the scenes at the moment, plus a hugely reduced number of people helping out. However, in order for more people to come back and support the club, both financially and vocally, we need answers and we need a clear direction out of this mess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...