Clown Job Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 On 12/09/2021 at 15:54, Wile E Coyote said: The media need to be making more of the British Royal Family helping an alleged peado evade justice. Get the Queen charged with perverting the course of justice It’s her courts, she’s above it She can’t be arrested 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wile E Coyote Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 5 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andrew-to-challenge-us-court-jurisdiction-in-sexual-assault-lawsuit-12407320 Basically he seems to be trying to weasel out of it by using points of law instead of getting out of it by being not guilty of being a rapist 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Khaki Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 On 12/09/2021 at 19:21, Jacksgranda said: Is that against the law? It didn't end well for Diana, did it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 If you were as innocent as he's making out, you'd be desperate to get into court, tell your Pizza Express story, and expose this lying woman. Sickening, watching this pantomime unfold. One rule for the 'elite' and another for everyone else. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 (edited) Think I just heard that one of the reasons to dismiss Andrews lawyers are arguing is the existence of a pre-existing settlement. Which is as good as a confession. Edited September 13, 2021 by williemillersmoustache 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 It isn't a settlement with him, it's a settlement with Weinstein. No idea how that exonerates Sweaty Andy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 If I'd been accused of a crime I'd like to think I'd want to prove my innocence rather than get off on a technicality. That said, how much can you trust in the American justice system given how many TV series you've watched over the years where someone's been jailed for a crime they didn't commit. Not just the A Team. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, Suspect Device said: If I'd been accused of a crime I'd like to think I'd want to prove my innocence rather than get off on a technicality. That said, how much can you trust in the American justice system given how many TV series you've watched over the years where someone's been jailed for a crime they didn't commit. Not just the A Team. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 One of the benefits of being the Duke of York is that there'll be records of literally every move you've made since birth. If one of us had to prove we were in a Pizza Express twenty years ago, we might struggle without obsessive record-keeping, but there'll be all sorts of government records about where he was, who he was with, etc. And that's before you get on to the eyewitnesses who'll be coming forward to tell of the day that a surprisingly arid son of Her Majesty walked into their place of work/local shitty pizza shop. Open and shut case, lads. Nothing to see here. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian1 Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, Billy Jean King said: See the Beeb were giving us an update on Randy's Balmoral "holiday" to the extent that he went shooting at the weekend apparently Ah so my efforts in shouting "Paedo" out the car window as I passed Balmoral on Saturday were a waste of time then......... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, Billy Jean King said: See the Beeb were giving us an update on Randy's Balmoral "holiday" to the extent that he went shooting at the weekend apparently Witnesses? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian1 Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 6 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: It isn't a settlement with him, it's a settlement with Weinstein. No idea how that exonerates Sweaty Andy. wrong creepy billionairre sex offender......it's Epstein 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Good to know that while UC is being cut and NI is being bumped up this glorious sceptred isle is spoffing its treasure on lawyers that charge the price of a small family car per hour to shield a nonce from justice in one of his mums castles. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said: Good to know that while UC is being cut and NI is being bumped up this glorious sceptred isle is spoffing its treasure on lawyers that charge the price of a small family car per hour to shield a nonce from justice in one of his mums castles. I’d like to see some disgruntled, drunken, retiring sub-editor at the Mail or Express shoehorn that into their paper. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 Just now, Granny Danger said: I’d like to see some disgruntled, drunken, retiring sub-editor at the Mail or Express shoehorn that into their paper. The Tax Payers Alliance are curiously quiet, they must see this as sensible and value for money public procurement. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 4 hours ago, Suspect Device said: If I'd been accused of a crime I'd like to think I'd want to prove my innocence rather than get off on a technicality. I wouldn't. Give me a technicality or a not proven any time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 16 hours ago, Clown Job said: It’s her courts, she’s above it She can’t be arrested I don't think the Queen plays up to this enough. She should turn a room in Buckingham Palace into a cannabis grow and wave the plants at the guards from an upstairs window whilst blasting NWA's "f**k the Police" at an unacceptable decibel level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, williemillersmoustache said: Think I just heard that one of the reasons to dismiss Andrews lawyers are arguing is the existence of a pre-existing settlement. Which is as good as a confession. Yip seemingly had a pre existing agreement from a person he claims to have never met sounds perfectly innocent 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 12 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: It isn't a settlement with him, it's a settlement with Weinstein. No idea how that exonerates Sweaty Andy. When I first heard that, my thought was that there was something in this settlement (ie details of various activities) that had a bearing. That suggests two things to me - that there is some mention in the earlier settlement that Andrew is innocent in some way (possibly inserted by Epstein to insulate Andrew from future actions just like this one). And that Andrew knows this is in the "confidential" settlement. So long as there is some hint or mention in the Epstein settlement that Andrew is innocent and the girl has signed it, that's their shield. I imagine that this defence has been planned for years and years. Why else would Andrew want the earlier settlement with somebody else included here? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted September 14, 2021 Share Posted September 14, 2021 3 hours ago, Sergeant Wilson said: I wouldn't. Give me a technicality or a not proven any time. You’d be found guilty and get 30 years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.