Mark Connolly Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 1 minute ago, Frank Quitely said: What do we reckon would have been the outcome if that 'goal' had been scored at the other end ? 3 goals for Spain, and a points deduction for us 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydeTon Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 3 minutes ago, Cardle is Magic said: You’re right - it IS a conspiracy to screw Scotland. I didn't mention "conspiracy" whatsoever, I was presenting the truth of what happened. Take this "conspiracy" pish to the Celtic or Rangers threads, or get it to f**k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, kingjoey said: The amount of folk I've seen wanting to bring foreign refs *The SFA has entered the chat* 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest_Man#1 Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 6 minutes ago, Skyline Drifter said: Uh huh. You dont think thats offside then? I have no idea why the ref appears to signal a direct free kick. Maybe he lost the plot and made the wrong signal. But its offside. I said immediately if its given for a foul then its an absolute nonsense. Thats still the case. As about 20 other people have already said that you’ve ignored completely, UEFA confirmed that it was given as a foul. Then about 20 mins later, presumably after watching it back a hundred times and realising that the referee has absolutely fucked it, have changed their minds to it being offside. You’re either being an idiot or deliberately obtuse in refusing to acknowledge this. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replays Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Genuine question, Hendry’s behind McTominay - would that have any bearing on the offside/onside debate? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, DukDukGoose said: Nah mate, it’s offside don’t you know? Hendry spat in the goalies eyes and did jumping jacks in front of him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scary Bear Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 37 minutes ago, Skyline Drifter said: Seriously though, its offside. Are we all watching this with blue tinted specs on? If that happens at the other end we're all screaming offside. He standing offside and he stops Simon getting to the ball. He's 100% interfering. I don’t want to join the red dot pile on, but that’s some take. Simon didn’t even try to make a save, I suspect he thought it was going past. Also his challenge on Robertson showed he’s not exactly afraid to challenge for the ball. If Spain score that I wonder if it would have been disallowed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Brightside Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, SReplay said: Genuine question, Hendry’s behind McTominay - would that have any bearing on the offside/onside debate? Depends where the ball was 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Quitely Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, theoriginalhedge said: Goal to Spain without a doubt. Absolutely, it was a rhetorical question. There is no way there would have been anything like the forensic fiasco we witnessed - the 'goal' would have stood, end of. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stressball Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, SReplay said: Genuine question, Hendry’s behind McTominay - would that have any bearing on the offside/onside debate? Nah it’s where the ball is 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StewartyMac Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 John McGinn's account of this is pretty damning, and he's nothing to gain or lose by lying about it. If the ref HAS told him he's chalked off the goal for a foul (and ALL the evidence points to this), then it's a MAJOR blunder by the VAR team, or whoever it was who confirmed it was given for offside instead. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 6 minutes ago, Cardle is Magic said: Ah, so they’re now covering the tracks to hide the conspiracy! Those sneaky b*****ds. No idea what they're doing, but the facts are that they've changed their original decision. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuctifano Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 I'm not buying what will be the official line of "it was given for offside but the ref didn't make the correct signal" but if that some how is the case then it's just fucking incompetent, it's not heat of the moment, he's just spent 2 minutes discussing why it's disallowed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuttonDressedAsLahm Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 If it is indeed a foul, then VAR's involvement was totally improper. If there's a foul there, it's of the softest possible variety and VAR is well outwith its expected involvement. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replays Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 1 minute ago, Mr. Brightside said: Depends where the ball was Ta. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulises de la Cruz Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 McGinn saying the ref changed his mind. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroundskeeperWillie Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Then, because it was given as a foul, which has been confirmed by John McGinn, you now agree it was absolute nonsense. I've never said otherwise. There's clearly been a horrendous communications mix up somewhere whatever they gave. IF they gave a foul thats an absolute joke of a decision. He is interfering with play though so if offside (which it appears he was) then it should be ruled out. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StewartyMac Posted October 12, 2023 Share Posted October 12, 2023 Just now, kingjoey said: No idea what they're doing, but the facts are that they've changed their original decision. Which, according to Mike Dean in his argument with that p***k Merson, is something they are not allowed to do. IT'S THE LAW!!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.