Jump to content

Russell Brand - In Plain Sight


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

He's an attention whore. He'd shave his arse, paint himself pink and change his name to Fred the Flamingo if it got him another hundred followers. 

 

He'll be loving all this - getting more views than he's had for years and everyone's talking about his favourite subject - him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ICTChris said:

Russell Brand had not retired from the mainstream media. He appeared in several major studio films last year, including Death On The Nile and Minions: Rise of Gru. He was, until last week, represented by a premier talent agency, Tavistock Wood. His books were published by MacMillan Publishing, one of the top publishers in the UK. His legal representatives are Thomson Heath & Associates, specialist defamation lawyers whose website states that they work for “senior political figures, advising FTSE companies and their executives, royal families, governments and celebrities.” Fight the power! The costs of having these guys is massive btw, probably hundreds of thousands of pounds at a minimum.

Up until pretty recently these people were in his corner. One of the accusers, the woman who said he sexually assaulted her when she was 16, wrote to Tavistock Wood and received a letter back from Thomson Heath threatening her with legal consequences. That was in 2020. He also personally threatened one of his accusers with legal action, by her account.

Regarding him suddenly becoming a threat to the establishment or mainstream media, he wrote books about revolution, advocated not voting, went on anti-capitalist protests and gave evidence to Parliamentary committees about drug policy all well before he started posting videos about vaccines etc.

Also, some people might have forgotten, but the Sachsgate story was absolutely massive - main story for weeks, BBC executives resigned, highest paid presenters resigned, questions in Parliament and condemnation from the Prime Minister. Large swathes of the British press (Daily Mail etc) were out for his blood then. If these allegations were so easy to conjure up, why didn’t they come out then?

The investigation by the Despatches team and the Sunday Times began in 2019, before Brand really leaned into his YouTube channel for content. There are also stories and rumours that these things were investigated previously and were shut down legally (The comments of his former management agency are interesting in this regard). These stories didn’t suddenly appear at the same time, it takes years to investigate, to fact check, to corroborate and to get the claims legally checked. If anyone has any evidence that the media conspired to do this now to hobble Brands YouTube channel or that the accusers are lying they are keeping it to themselves. 

hAVe You EVEn wATChed the viDEoS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

If it was so easy, politicians would be suing the press left, right and centre on a regular basis. But they don't. Because it's the press. They're too big to be taken to task when they lie or slander people these days, that's why nothing is done about it the vast majority of the time. 

What politicians do you think would have a case against the press, on the basis of lies and slander, over the last few years? You must have lots of examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Darren said:

What politicians do you think would have a case against the press, on the basis of lies and slander, over the last few years? You must have lots of examples.

You'll struggle to get an answer here. We're still waiting for more than Assange on the list of people who the Deep State have fitted up with rape allegations because they were about to blow the lid off the whole establishment.

Apparently there's loads of them. It always happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BTFD said:

You'll struggle to get an answer here. We're still waiting for more than Assange on the list of people who the Deep State have fitted up with rape allegations because they were about to blow the lid off the whole establishment.

Apparently there's loads of them. It always happens.

You never hear about them because anyone who's a threat to the New World Order, Deep State, Bilderburgers gets quietly disappeared in a way that nobody notices.  Like Epstein.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

The fact that you think Russell Brand is "right wing" is proof that you've never really watched any of his content. Same as any of the other posters on here who are quick to rubbish content that they've never actually watched before.

To be fair @EH75 wasn’t so much saying that Brand was a right wing grifter as suggesting that he was using a similar playbook. it was the “grifter” part that was more pertinent 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

  

Then why was nothing made of it at the time? Why is it that in these kinds of situations, a multitude of women just so happen to simultaneously come forward at precisely the same time decades later?

 

19 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

The man had celebrity status and a whole lot of money behind him. 

 

You've literally answered your own questions later in the very same post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 19QOS19 said:

You've literally answered your own questions later in the very same post. 

This has been a very confused and irrational head's gone.

We've all had people we've liked or respected that have turned out to be nogoodniks; knee-jerk defence rarely works out to be the best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, StellarHibee said:

  

Then why was nothing made of it at the time? Why is it that in these kinds of situations, a multitude of women just so happen to simultaneously come forward at precisely the same time decades later? I'm not saying Brand was a good person in the past. The guy had a multitude of problems, particularly with drug and alcohol use. So I can certainly believe that he was involved in risky behaviour scenarios. But that doesn't automatically equate to rape. The man had celebrity status and a whole lot of money behind him. Hardly a stretch that women would get involved with him sexually due to the money and status, then perhaps have regrets about it later. Which again, doesn't automatically equate to rape or sexual assault.

I hope to f**k there are no females close to you in your life you utter fucking wrong un.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Newbornbairn said:

He's an attention whore. He'd shave his arse, paint himself pink and change his name to Fred the Flamingo if it got him another hundred followers. 

 

He'll be loving all this - getting more views than he's had for years and everyone's talking about his favourite subject - him. 

That said, much of it will be about how 'great' he is.  If more folk than not perceive him in a deeply negative context, that'll cut deep.

Edited by Hedgecutter
can't prooof read
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...