Jump to content

Unpopular opinions.


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, milton75 said:

"Dog lovers" having to have their Alsatian put down at 9 years old because its hips are f**ked. (see also pugs breathing, spaniel's runny eyes, etc. etc. ad infinitum)

The sort of folk that breed dogs are absolute wrong 'uns.

And a scruffy mutt is 100x nicer to look at than any ghastly cockerpoodle shit I've ever seen anyway. If you don't want dog hair all over your house and car maybe don't have a dog. That would be an easier solution than inbreeding some poor b*****d to the point of congenital illness.

"Cockerpoodles" surely is the opposite of inbreeding.  The clue is in the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Loonytoons said:

"Cockerpoodles" surely is the opposite of inbreeding.  The clue is in the name.

It's not the opposite of inbreeding. The opposite is letting shit happen naturally. It's, at best, one rung down the ladder from in-breeding purely cocker spaniels or poodles, but once they have a line of cockerpoos with a good return in cash, the system effectively resets and they'll be breeding them with each other anyway.

All so someone can have a dog that looks a certain way but doesn't shed so much fur. It's a creepy industry and anyone that genuinely cares about dogs should not be perpetuating the cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, milton75 said:

It's not the opposite of inbreeding. The opposite is letting shit happen naturally. It's, at best, one rung down the ladder from in-breeding purely cocker spaniels or poodles, but once they have a line of cockerpoos with a good return in cash, the system effectively resets and they'll be breeding them with each other anyway.

All so someone can have a dog that looks a certain way but doesn't shed so much fur. It's a creepy industry and anyone that genuinely cares about dogs should not be perpetuating the cycle.

I'm being a pedant.  Pretty much agree with your sentiments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tongue_tied_danny said:

Atheists are a bunch of smug wankers who deserve to spend eternity in the sixth circle of hell with a red hot trident rammed firmly up their jacksies.

If only! Anal Torture isn't just the name of my grindcore side project, y'know.

Personally, I like to say I'm agnostic if asked, as that even seems to piss off the atheists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, tongue_tied_danny said:

Atheists are a bunch of smug wankers who deserve to spend eternity in the sixth circle of hell with a red hot trident rammed firmly up their jacksies.

This would carry some threat if I was one of those dafties who believed in hell. 😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...