Jump to content

Smith commission (look what you could've won)


renton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I am not the one disappeared a month before the referendum and then commenced posting absolute shite a month after it Just saying.

Yawnnnnnn

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

etc. etc.

I wish I as interested in you as you appear to be in me, whatever gets you through the day and all that, yoinks 8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Youu're not really in a position to speak for those who claim to have been influenced by the vow.

Don't really have the time or patience for the HB ask the same question over and over again game today man. .

Perhaps you can give us some more if your pre Referendum anecdotal evidence . That was great - aces.

Still I'm glad we've established that you have absolutely no idea what effect if any The Vow had.

And again its good we've established that you've made an utter c**t of yourself once again by failing completely to answer the question.

You are the gift that just keeps giving. Down with the Colkittos of the world in the credibility stakes for you I'm afraid. Shite patter .. Shite poster. I'm yet to find out what it is you contribute. Its like s poor tribute act on a cruise ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said I didn't have time yesterday for that thing where HB asks you the same question constantly. The solution? Ask again the next day! f**k me that is industrious. Clever boy.

Perhaps you can give us some more if your pre Referendum anecdotal evidence . That was great - aces.

Still I'm glad we've established that you have absolutely no idea what effect if any The Vow had.

I think I've said quite a few times that I think the vow had very little actual effect, other than giving some people who were probably a bit ashamed of themselves (see, silent majority) a bit of an excuse. Scotland was going to vote No before the vow and they were going to vote No after. Which makes it highly amusing that Westminster's incompetence here has kept this right at the forefront of Scottish/British politics.

Pleasing.

And again its good we've established that you've made an utter c**t of yourself once again by failing completely to answer the question.

Incorrect. All I said (just after I directly answered the question) was that I wasn't going to spend yesterday answering it over and over again. I'm not going to today either but try tomorrow if you want.

You are the gift that just keeps giving. Down with the Colkittos of the world in the credibility stakes for you I'm afraid. Shite patter .. Shite poster. I'm yet to find out what it is you contribute. Its like s poor tribute act on a cruise ship.

Actually take a step back and objectively have a think about whether this stuff makes you look absolutely rattled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, still unwilling to enter into a sensible discussion of the facts then. Duly noted.

one fact is true, compared to the SNP submission, what they have settled for is very little, stills begs the question to the competence of the SNP reps. On the commission
Link to comment
Share on other sites

one fact is true, compared to the SNP submission, what they have settled for is very little, stills begs the question to the competence of the SNP reps. On the commission

You still haven't explained how the four independent attendees could bend the six unionist attendees and the unionist chairman to their will. Which just makes you look foolish, frankly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You still haven't explained how the four independent attendees could bend the six unionist attendees and the unionist chairman to their will. Which just makes you look foolish, frankly.

You know it wasn't just a show of hands?, but you take me back my original point, if they did not think they could get a decent deal, they should have withdrawn and not put their names to it, surely that would be better than what we have now, which is the SNP bleating about a agreement in which were in agreement with, now that does make the SNP look foolish

Surely the only reason they did not withdraw was because of the fear of "bad press"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they hadn't settled for it, then the media would have had a field day with crap like "Oh look, the SNP dinnae want mare powers for Scotland, they lied"....etc

And no doubt you'd be getting your jollies about it on here.

Confi, surely with the new confidence the SNP now have, the 80000 new members, they have never had it so good, they are flying but were they really caring about what the media were going to say, really

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, is this you starting to get it?

The press will look for any reason to make the SNP look bad, regardless of how desperate their attempts are.

The SNP aren't stupid, they are fully aware of the power that mainstream media can have on the easily led public. So they need to avoid bad press as much as possible to maintain their support up to the general election.

That's when the real fun begins.

NewsNetScotland, Wings over Scotland, The National or the appalling Bella Caledonia for this levels of paranoia :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...