hearthammer Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 5 hours ago, hearthammer said: There are parallels between these "insider" manoeuvres by de pfeffellllll during brexit and bush and close cohorts pre-9/11. As the man says, "follow the money". Senor Miguel Sanchez. You red-dotted me, which is your prerogative of course. This i have no problem with. However, can you please clarify where i am wrong or the point(s) in the original publication incorrect ?? I was merely using the parallels of the establishment feeding their own and not giving a flying about the general population. Did you read and/or view the publication/video ?? Or was it that the dot was for what you would consider a shit photo of New York ?? Cheers -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 4 minutes ago, Kneal Down Caster said: One of the biggest issues for me is that not many trust MP’s, thinking they all lie and are self serving bullshitters. The just get on with it brigade just don’t believe any of the damaging information out there. They should set up another referendum a week after, go for full blown no deal and watch the landslide remain vote when the gammons can’t get their blood pressure meds or a cheap can of Stella. The doctor was telling me this morning they are having problems getting their quota of flu vaccine delivered. (Mind you, it was the same last year.) It may, or may not, be Brexit related. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenanover Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 42 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said: Please don’t judge the whole Scottish nation by the sort of person who sprays insults anonymously on the politics thread of a football forum! I do aways like to see your cricket and rugby and football teams get gubbed though. I am not judging the whole Scottish nation, just the Scottish nationalists on here. I am Scottish and support our football and rugby teams. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UsedToGoToCentralPark Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 Norway seems a strange arrangement to name-check as the way forward? I suspect I'm being trolled. For the record, Norway; 1. Pays the EU for access to it's market 2. Accepts the 'four freedoms' which for emphasis includes the free movement of labour 3. Is a rule taker Of course despite this, it doesn't have a say at the EU itself, so I can see why a Brexiteer would be all for it! Yours aDONisThis would be worse than remaining. Far better to remain and be a decision maker than leave with this model in place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 6 minutes ago, Kneal Down Caster said: One of the biggest issues for me is that not many trust MP’s, thinking they all lie and are self serving bullshitters. The just get on with it brigade just don’t believe any of the damaging information out there. They should set up another referendum a week after, go for full blown no deal and watch the landslide remain vote when the gammons can’t get their blood pressure meds or a cheap can of Stella. I think it's naïve to presume that they would regret their decision even if the worst possibilities came true. They will just blame everyone else as usual, and most especially they'll blame our neighbours and the EU. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 5 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Senor Miguel Sanchez. You red-dotted me, which is your prerogative of course. This i have no problem with. However, can you please clarify where i am wrong or the point(s) in the original publication incorrect ?? I was merely using the parallels of the establishment feeding their own and not giving a flying about the general population. Did you read and/or view the publication/video ?? Or was it that the dot was for what you would consider a shit photo of New York ?? Cheers Stop trying to sidetrack the thread with obviously off-topic pish. I know that Pat Jeden has won the thread by pointing out that only in half a century will we know if Brexit was a good idea but f**k off and start your own thread nonetheless. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Glenanover said: I am not judging the whole Scottish nation, just the Scottish nationalists on here. I am Scottish and support our football and rugby teams. You're accusing Scotland, or pro-independence people, of being characteristically xenophobic on the basis of a very small number of roasters on the internet? Really? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 48 minutes ago, coprolite said: It might also be because Welsh people favour brexit. My Welsh hairdresser says it's a good idea because it's about time someone sorted out the Muslims. Is blaming the English for Brexit qualitatively different from the xenophobia of blaming Europeans for the Uk's ills? You have to wonder at the wisdom of setting up a referendum aimed at letting the people decide whether or not they wish to remain in the EU - given that even now, so many simply do not understand what the EU is responsible for, and not responsible for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 1 hour ago, coprolite said: My Welsh hairdresser says it's a good idea because it's about time someone sorted out the Muslims. He must be a really good hairdresser for you keep going back despite the rampant racism. The boy that cuts my hair is from Tunisia and has never mentioned politics. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: Have a read of the Hibs thread every now and then. Yes, that’s a good place to go if you crave the reassurance of group-think delusion and the validation of like-minded “individuals” giving each other big.....erm....ticks. Don’t go for a debate though. Edited September 12, 2019 by Pet Jeden 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 41 minutes ago, welshbairn said: The Belfast judge is probably saying pretty much what the Supreme Court will say on Tuesday. Aye the Scottish decision looks like a strange one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 1 minute ago, Detournement said: Aye the Scottish decision looks like a strange one. Why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, Detournement said: He must be a really good hairdresser for you keep going back despite the rampant racism. The boy that cuts my hair is from Tunisia and has never mentioned politics. She's one of 6 that works at the local barbers. I am not walking an extra 10 minutes for a pc haircut and she has massive tits. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 8 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Why? Was the Scottish judgement not based on the background reasons of the prorogation (ie to avoid scrutiny, etc,) rather than questioning the concept and legality of the prorogation itself ?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 2 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Was the Scottish judgement not based on the background reasons of the prorogation (ie to avoid scrutiny, etc,) rather than questioning the concept and legality of the prorogation itself ?? Eh? Oh, err, um... Ah dinnae ken. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 20 minutes ago, coprolite said: She's one of 6 that works at the local barbers. I am not walking an extra 10 minutes for a pc haircut and she has massive tits. You should have mentioned the tits in the first post. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 23 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Why? We don't know what the reasons are yet but in the short statement yesterday they seemed to be referring to vague constitutional principles which aren't codified anywhere. We don't have a written constitution so there's no place here for US style judicial interpretations. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 3 minutes ago, Detournement said: We don't know what the reasons are yet but in the short statement yesterday they seemed to be referring to vague constitutional principles which aren't codified anywhere. We don't have a written constitution so there's no place here for US style judicial interpretations. Surely as we haven't a written constitution, that's all the more reason to have judicial interpretations? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dee_62 Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 Nice little 2 min explanation of some of the issues faced by the Supreme Court next week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 17 minutes ago, hearthammer said: Was the Scottish judgement not based on the background reasons of the prorogation (ie to avoid scrutiny, etc,) rather than questioning the concept and legality of the prorogation itself ?? 2 minutes ago, Detournement said: We don't know what the reasons are yet but in the short statement yesterday they seemed to be referring to vague constitutional principles which aren't codified anywhere. We don't have a written constitution so there's no place here for US style judicial interpretations. I know the COS is going to publish more on their verdict tomorrow which should be interesting. Would it be fair to assume the Supreme Court will throw the whole thing out? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.