Jump to content

Oor Nicola Sturgeon thread.


Pearbuyerbell

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

You are not meant to insult other users on this forum, insulting politicians is acceptable.

OK. Withdrawn.
I’ll keep an eye to ensure you don’t insult other posters or turn a blind eye to other posters being insulted going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

I hope the police make a statement soon.  I’d really like to know what they think he’s done.  I’d also like to know what they were digging for.

If he’s done nothing wrong I’d imagine he and his lawyers would want transparency too.

I read somewhere yesterday that they were not digging for anything.

Those dafties with drones spotted John Q Law taking spades etc out the garden shed (as they were looking in it), put 2 and 2 together and came up with Brookside Close...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Just a correction to your claim that he was found not guilty on all criminal charges.

Not Proven is an acquittal in Scots Law. 
 

he was acquitted on all charges yet many of you still have him as guilty. 
 

you had him as guilty. Before, during and after.

 

looking forward to the cries of “innocent until proven guilty” with regard to Murrell and his cohorts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bennett said:

Don't they have fitness levels for the polis,  even I could run away from that policewoman at the front. 

 

 

Guess who is doing the run to Greggs for Steak bakes..... "Run" might be stretching it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, bennett said:

Don't they have fitness levels for the polis,  even I could run away from that policewoman at the front. 

 

 

Fitness standards are laughably low for the Polis these days. 5.4 on the bleep test is the minimum standard, which is a slow jog. 
Think after your probation too there’s no further fitness tests unless joining a unit that requires it e.g Firearms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/04/2023 at 22:28, Leith Green said:

Salmond was acquitted because of staggering levels of incompetence in the crown office.

The suggestion that he was in some way the innocent victim (when there were about 12 complainants who put their careers on the line) is ludicrous in the extreme.

12 complainants and not a single guilty verdict.  That doesn't point to incompetence.

On 06/04/2023 at 12:22, Granny Danger said:

You are not meant to insult other users on this forum, insulting politicians is acceptable.

You were a politician, so fair game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...