Florentine_Pogen Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/04/loophole-dead-sex-trafficker-stay-classy-andrew-virginia-giuffre-epstein?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Tourette Posted January 4, 2022 Share Posted January 4, 2022 Judge: “So you’re saying your client is not guilty of sex offences against this under age girl?”Royal lawyers: “Yes m’lud”Judge: “Because he’s included in a previous settlement by paedo Jeff and his trafficking pals?”Royal lawyers: “Yes m’lud” 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I think the royal historian Robert Lacey nailed it tonight when he suggested that the monarchy will lurch on but the Priapic Prince is toast whatever happens from here on in. FWIW, and after reading today's accounts, I think the judge will throw out the attempt to kill off the action, but after that who knows what will happen* *Probably Johnson offering US vulture capital the NHS on a plate provided all the bad stories go away and we can all enjoy the Platinum Jubilee.If he loses a civil trial there will almost certainly be pressure put on for a criminal investigation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: If he loses a civil trial there will almost certainly be pressure put on for a criminal investigation. Im absolutely disgusted there isnt one already in the UK, she very clearly was trafficked to the UK for purposes of sex, its a crime, it needs investigating. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 I really hope this isn’t a parody account. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soapy FFC Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 19 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said: I really hope this isn’t a parody account. I'm sitting open mouthed (and not in any good way) at some of the comments from her in that thread Quote Even if he did do it i dont care.He is an important,poweful man.She is nothing! The judge wil side with the ruling class.His career will depend on it ! Must be a bot or parody account. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 "My client can't be guilty because Roberts signed an agreement with Epstein to absolve him of any guilt but, more importantly, the same agreement absolves anyone else of guilt even now that Epstein is dead. "We rest our case." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 4 hours ago, John Lambies Doos said: Who is paying for paedo Andys lawyers? Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler You are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 7 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: If he loses a civil trial there will almost certainly be pressure put on for a criminal investigation. If Goodwillie goes to Falkirk, Clyde will sign him if it follows that trajectory. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Im absolutely disgusted there isnt one already in the UK, she very clearly was trafficked to the UK for purposes of sex, its a crime, it needs investigating. I completely agree.The document defence is just an utter nonsense - it would mean that any sex crime could just be closed if there was a document signed by the victim.A complete joke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 8 hours ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said: Im absolutely disgusted there isnt one already in the UK, she very clearly was trafficked to the UK for purposes of sex, its a crime, it needs investigating. We now know that the polis in the UK don't investigate incidents that happened in the past. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Just now, BFTD said: We now know that the polis in the UK don't investigate incidents that happened in the past. Pretty sure that was the Met, not everything the Met does is reflective of the approach everywhere else, indeed id say it was the outlier. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Cort's Hamstring Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, BFTD said: We now know that the polis in the UK don't investigate incidents that happened in the past. To be fair, that was only the opinion of *checks notes* the Lord High Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Heard a snippet from a bbc news report on andrew this morning: ”this case will put a dampener on the queens jubilee year” Aye, that’s the main issue here, isn’t it lads? 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Why is this taking so long? Does that mean judge is actually seriously considering his noncesense argument? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RH33 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 3 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Why is this taking so long? Does that mean judge is actually seriously considering his noncesense argument? Nah he's just making Andrew sweat..... 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Priti priti priti Patel Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Why is this taking so long? Does that mean judge is actually seriously considering his noncesense argument? Not necessarily. The judge will be aware that whichever party he rules against is likely to appeal his ruling, so will take a bit of extra time to make sure the judgment is watertight. In any event, it's only been a few working hours since the judge finished hearing submissions. A decision like this would take a few days at least in my experience. Edited January 5, 2022 by Priti priti priti Patel 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 17 minutes ago, RH33 said: Nah he's just making Andrew sweat..... The headline on the Daily Mail website yesterday was just that - "Judge makes Andrew sweat..." but they quickly changed it. Spoiler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 10 hours ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said: Im absolutely disgusted there isnt one already in the UK, she very clearly was trafficked to the UK for purposes of sex, its a crime, it needs investigating. The US investigation is because she was a minor over there at 17. That's not underage here. Don't know anything about the trafficking aspect to be honest, you're probably right, but thst sounds like a more difficult thing to prove. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) 12 hours ago, O'Kelly Isley III said: I think the royal historian Robert Lacey nailed it tonight when he suggested that the monarchy will lurch on but the Priapic Prince is toast whatever happens from here on in. FWIW, and after reading today's accounts, I think the judge will throw out the attempt to kill off the action, but after that who knows what will happen* *Probably Johnson offering US vulture capital the NHS on a plate provided all the bad stories go away and we can all enjoy the Platinum Jubilee. This, the Royal Family's "work" is being figureheads for charities and military regiments and I don't see either queueing up to be associated with him - even if Giuffre's case is dismissed the best he can hope for is to be sat somewhere near the back at Chuck's coronation but either way he'll never be at the Top Table again. Edited January 5, 2022 by btb 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.