Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, stuart87 said:

I have dreamt of watching Scotland at a major tournament since I was 10 in 1998. Having managed to get tickets for the Hampden games at the Euros, I fear I am going to be left disappointed as the games are played behind closed doors or in a different country that we can’t go to. Someone give me some hope.

We'll probably get pumped anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuart87 said:

I have dreamt of watching Scotland at a major tournament since I was 10 in 1998. Having managed to get tickets for the Hampden games at the Euros, I fear I am going to be left disappointed as the games are played behind closed doors or in a different country that we can’t go to. Someone give me some hope.

Once the AZ/Oxford vaccine gets regulatory approval you could effectively go door to door with it. I'd expect us to really ramp up vaccinations at that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

I agree, but they are also saying this:

They seem to be missing the point that providing the vaccine reduces the chance of serious illness by around 90% it doesn't really matter whether or not it reduces transmission, or by how much.

...true but the cranky irrational curtain twitcher brigade won't see it that way and Nicola consistently dances to their tune. The silent majority need to stop being apathetic and make their voices heard on this. Once the most vulnerable 20% or so who have had the vast majority of fatalities have been vaccinated or at least have had the chance to be and knocked it back, it will be absurd to be at higher than Level 0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

I agree, but they are also saying this:

They seem to be missing the point that providing the vaccine reduces the chance of serious illness by around 90% it doesn't really matter whether or not it reduces transmission, or by how much.

Very frustrating. That same thread includes that guy saying Sturgeon has to balance the economical damage with the risk of young people getting "long covid". That really worries me that this is, even maybe, the government's line. If a vaccine is 95% effective, and the "risk" of "long covid" is already pretty small, surely they cannot actually be trying to enforce social distancing next summer when I would assume the overwhelming majority of vulnerable people are vaccinated.

They are not having the correct conversations between themselves or with the public.  I've went full circle from being broadly supportive of the Scottish governments cautious approach to worrying greatly about their competence and willingness when it comes to reopening things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any predictions of how this plays out are premature. We don’t know how good the vaccines are - remember Pfizer tested only symptomatic people who requested one, and they were living in a culture of distancing/masks etc. Real world, with closer contacts and masks less common, it might be far less effective. If it is but nobody really gets ill, then that’s great but that needs to be quantified and understood. You can’t just presume that. We need to be able to understand the inevitable deaths of vaccinated people dying within 28 days of a positive Covid test. We need to know whether Covid is still a factor in killing them - easy on an individual basis, harder at population level. And we need to see significantly less people showing up at hospitals with Covid/Covid symptoms.

 

Hopefully all these things come through. But you’d need to be an idiot (anyone seen our Prime Minister lately?) to put your name to what April or the summer will definitively look like. Anything could happen. Politicians especially shouldn’t be committing to anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Big Fifer said:

Very frustrating. That same thread includes that guy saying Sturgeon has to balance the economical damage with the risk of young people getting "long covid". That really worries me that this is, even maybe, the government's line. If a vaccine is 95% effective, and the "risk" of "long covid" is already pretty small, surely they cannot actually be trying to enforce social distancing next summer when I would assume the overwhelming majority of vulnerable people are vaccinated.

They are not having the correct conversations between themselves or with the public.  I've went full circle from being broadly supportive of the Scottish governments cautious approach to worrying greatly about their competence and willingness when it comes to reopening things. 

" its just not worth the risk" is a phrase mostly used by those who do not have any understanding  of risk assessing or management

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Paco said:

Any predictions of how this plays out are premature. We don’t know how good the vaccines are - remember Pfizer tested only symptomatic people who requested one, and they were living in a culture of distancing/masks etc. Real world, with closer contacts and masks less common, it might be far less effective. If it is but nobody really gets ill, then that’s great but that needs to be quantified and understood. You can’t just presume that. We need to be able to understand the inevitable deaths of vaccinated people dying within 28 days of a positive Covid test. We need to know whether Covid is still a factor in killing them - easy on an individual basis, harder at population level. And we need to see significantly less people showing up at hospitals with Covid/Covid symptoms.

 

Hopefully all these things come through. But you’d need to be an idiot (anyone seen our Prime Minister lately?) to put your name to what April or the summer will definitively look like. Anything could happen. Politicians especially shouldn’t be committing to anything.

I understand your point, but I think it's an entirely legitimate viewpoint to expect the government in the middle of January to set out a plan for how the country opens back up assuming the vaccine is as effective as the trials show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Big Fifer said:

Very frustrating. That same thread includes that guy saying Sturgeon has to balance the economical damage with the risk of young people getting "long covid". That really worries me that this is, even maybe, the government's line. If a vaccine is 95% effective, and the "risk" of "long covid" is already pretty small, surely they cannot actually be trying to enforce social distancing next summer when I would assume the overwhelming majority of vulnerable people are vaccinated.

They are not having the correct conversations between themselves or with the public.  I've went full circle from being broadly supportive of the Scottish governments cautious approach to worrying greatly about their competence and willingness when it comes to reopening things. 

My understanding of "Long Covid" is that it is essentially Post Viral Fatigue Syndrome re-badged.

It seems inconceiveable that someone experiencing a very mild infection would develop this.

Like everything else, there will likely be a small number of examples of this, which the media and public will no doubt over-react to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SG pulling back from the 4 (or 5?) day "relaxation of rules and recommending that if you have to meet up just do it for one day and no overnight stays if possible.

ETA: BBC now reporting that it seems it's as you were in England but in Wales they are recommending no more than two households mix.

Edited by RiG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was nice of Steedman to waffle for the best part of 10 mins just to tell us that she has no idea how long will it take to get people vaccinated.

Needed more insincere touches of the sternum imo.

FWIW, I find it weird watching her as she looks remarkably like my aunt did ~20 years ago.  Can I still say "wid"? (Steedman, not the aunt)  :unsure:

Edited by Hedgecutter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hedgecutter said:

Was nice of Steedman to waffle for the best part of 10 mins just to tell us that she has no idea how long will it take to get people vaccinated.

Needed more insincere touches of the sternum imo.

Happy to have her touch my sternum, sincerely or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...