Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dennistoun Bairn said:

...yeah, just what we need; re-sign another 5foot8, 10 stone midfielder who has no physical presence, doesn't go box to box, can't shoot, and can barely pass further than 10 yards from inside his own half.  Brilliant. We've been down this road over the last.. 5, 6, 7? years, and its baffling that some folks still think this kind of player is going to make us better.  Significantly better than what we have is what we desperately need. Remind me how long its been debated that we need stronger, taller midfielders in the team, not lightweight makeweights?   

Im not saying we should sign him but hartley surely must see something in him to be offering him a new deal when he hasnt exactly set the heather on fire so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dennistoun Bairn said:

Will be more interested to see him clattering right into "Heid's Gone" Higginbothum to be honest.  Hard, but legal, like. 

Not too fussed about the legal tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harry Kinnear said:
15 minutes ago, Poet of the Macabre said:
Higgy's left you lot seething for months. Incredible effort from him.

Think the seethe is more prominent from his direction towards us

I could tell that as Falkirk fans raced from their seats to shout abuse at him, while he cupped his ears and kissed the badge of the mighty Dunfermline Athletic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Poet of the Macabre said:

 

Higgy's left you lot seething for months. Incredible effort from him.

Its more point and laugh coming from our side Poet; seems pretty clear the seethe is all in (what's left of) his exploded heid.  Great entertainment though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Believe The Hype said:

I suppose you'd still need Scott's dig money, that's the only reason I can think why you have Longridge on that list instead of your laddie. 

Shepherd is still under contract so getting rid of him wouldn't save us anything because we'd have to pay that up. Those five aren't.

Edited by EdiBairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EdiBairn said:

Shepherd is still under contract so getting rid of him wouldn't save us anything because we'd have to pay that up. Those five aren't.

Easily solved. Crowdfunder. @keithgy get on it please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shepherd is still under contract so getting rid of him wouldn't save us anything because we'd have to pay that up. Those five aren't.


Do you think we would pay it all?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, EdiBairn said:

Why would he walk away from a full time contract if we didn't? 

 Because he'd get partial payment and walk into another job, if he's as good as you reckon he is. Quids in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...