The_Kincardine Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 13 minutes ago, vikingTON said: Just another addition to your long list of fantasy island claims then. 6 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: How would you know anything? You are just sad and thick loser. I ken whose jaiket I'd haud in this particular verbal scrap..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meth Damon Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Love everyone laughing at UKIP, who without we wouldn't have had the referendum that change Britain forever, delicious 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 How would you know anything? You are just sad and thick loser. The sort of sad-sack comeback that confirms that you did absolutely nothing of the sort. You sat down, shut up and did what you were told as usual.Rather like your victim status on this forum actually. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terry_Tibbs Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 If not Woolfe for leader then who? Spoiler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 25 minutes ago, iknowwheremaddieis said: Love everyone laughing at UKIP, who without we wouldn't have had the referendum that change Britain forever, delicious 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Love everyone laughing at UKIP, who without we wouldn't have had the referendum that change Britain forever, delicious Learn English or f**k off back to where you came from. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 1 minute ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: Learn English or f**k off back to where you came from. I'm not a UKIP lover but I don't see a thing wrong with his post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstarstranraer Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) 40 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I'm not a UKIP lover but I don't see a thing wrong with his post. It should surely be 'without whom' rather than 'who without' for starters, and change should be conjugated. Aside from that it's a very inelegant sentence to say the least. Not very important stuff but I think there are several things clearly wrong with his post other than the asinine sentiment. Edited October 6, 2016 by Redstarstranraer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 1 minute ago, Redstarstranraer said: It should surely be 'without whom' rather than 'who without' for starters, and change should be conjugated. Aside from that it's a very inelegant sentence to say the least. Not very important stuff but I think there are several things clearly wrong with his post other than the asinine sentiment. How dare you suggest I was responsible for that travesty of a post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 1 minute ago, Redstarstranraer said: It should surely be 'without whom' rather than 'who without' for starters, and change should be conjugated. Aside from that it's a very inelegant sentence to say the least. Not very important stuff but I think there are several things clearly wrong with his post other than the asinine sentiment. I see you on 'change' but "who without" is clearly ok. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstarstranraer Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 1 hour ago, iknowwheremaddieis said: Love everyone laughing at UKIP, who without we wouldn't have had the referendum that change Britain forever, delicious To apportion the blame correctly and for the avoidance of doubt see above. 4 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: How dare you suggest I was responsible for that travesty of a post. Sorry, my mistake. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Thank you. Perhaps in Donny's eagerness to troll his exuberance got the better of him and led to a little typographic mishap. I'm sure it's happened to us all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redstarstranraer Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 5 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I see you on 'change' but "who without" is clearly ok. I'm quite sure that 'whom' is the correct choice when used with a preposition such as 'without'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 I'm quite sure that 'whom' is the correct choice when used with a preposition such as 'without'. It's a relative clause on the object of a sentence. Without whom is correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Rider Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 8 hours ago, iknowwheremaddieis said: Love everyone laughing at UKIP, who without we wouldn't have had the referendum that change Britain forever, delicious No full stop used either. Looks like everyone is laughing at you chump. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 8 hours ago, The_Kincardine said: I'm not a UKIP lover but I don't see a thing wrong with his post. I didn't take the post to be critical of the dub drinker. I just thought topcat was shouting a UKIP slogan. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane's child Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 UKIP, by virtue of the sucessful Brexit vote, are now politically irrelevant as a party. For all the years of campaigning to leave the EU, Farage or the party won't have a single say or influence in how we do it. With just one MP and soon to be out of a job MEP'S, the party will be unable to find a new identity and won't have the political sway to influence things. RIP UKIP 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 Hopefully the French authorities are taking steps to remove these violent foreign workers from their country 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 11 hours ago, vikingTON said: The sort of sad-sack comeback that confirms that you did absolutely nothing of the sort. You sat down, shut up and did what you were told as usual. Rather like your victim status on this forum actually. You are just an ignorant troll. Go back to you cave near Crappielow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 I've worked with people who have used threats of violence in the office. People that do that tend to have a massive inferiority complex, it's actually quite pathetic to see adults who see violence as a normal way to settle a disagreement. You occasionally see it on here with people promising to 'sort out' other posters or DM-ing them directly threatening them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.