Thereisalight.. Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 14 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: People are definitely NOT allowed to work on the employment they have been furloughed from, Yeah. I know a beautician who’s been furloughed but she’s been working in a supermarket for over a month now 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arch Stanton Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 4 hours ago, pozbaird said: She was a right MILF type though. Shame she never fancied breaking the 2m guidelines in a more meaningful manner.... Did you want to play a round with her? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 13 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: Atm its 80% and topped up so 60% and topped up is possible for some? It's not topped up for all. 80% is manageable but difficult living for most (I'd hope, but know there's certainly a load who wouldn't manage) but 60% is as pointed out, a little over half of your wage. Considering rent sits somewhere around 30% of people's income on average then that really doesn't leave a lot to live off of after bills etc are paid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 I’m not sure how long people expect the furlough scheme to go on for. Businesses will need to reopen regardless of the political objectives of the government, the longer they stay shut the more chance they will never reopen. The objective must be to create as safe a working environment as is practically possible and also encourage people to social distance outwith the workplace. I’m more concerned about the spread of the virus in social settings outwith work than I am in the workplace where employers and most employees will have a vested interest to follow protocols. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 Bedtime reading. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 Interesting wee news bit on bbc Scotland.If the lockdown had started two weeks earlier then 2000 lives would have been saved in scotland.Also one of the first outbreaks was in Edinburgh nike store in February.BBC disclosure has more on iplayer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thereisalight.. Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 5 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: Interesting wee news bit on bbc Scotland. If the lockdown had started two weeks earlier then 2000 lives would have been saved in scotland. Also one of the first outbreaks was in Edinburgh nike store in February. BBC disclosure has more on iplayer I honestly didn’t know we had over 2000 deaths in Scotland so far. Last I heard it was about 1800 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 I honestly didn’t know we had over 2000 deaths in Scotland so far. Last I heard it was about 1800https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-52617895 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael W Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 Some form of furlough or perhaps converting it to a targeted subsidy aimed at certain sectors will be needed as part of the exit plan. Restaurants and particularly pubs just aren't going to stand a chance when social distancing rules force them to reduce their capacity by 50-75%. Many will just decide not to bother reopening. Get it wrong and the entire sector will be annihilated. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted May 11, 2020 Author Share Posted May 11, 2020 One of the members of the Chilcott Inquiry into the war in Iraq has written an account of the Covid crisis in the U.K.https://www.iiss.org/blogs/survival-blog/2020/05/the-uk-and-covid-19It’s interesting but pretty long. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 57 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: Interesting wee news bit on bbc Scotland. If the lockdown had started two weeks earlier then 2000 lives would have been saved in scotland. Also one of the first outbreaks was in Edinburgh nike store in February. BBC disclosure has more on iplayer The Scottish government only had the ability to enforce any lockdown measures on March 25th when the powers were granted to them by UK Gov Coronavirus Bill. Two days after lockdown began! An inconvenient fact they will likely miss out. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted May 11, 2020 Share Posted May 11, 2020 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Michael W said: Some form of furlough or perhaps converting it to a targeted subsidy aimed at certain sectors will be needed as part of the exit plan. Restaurants and particularly pubs just aren't going to stand a chance when social distancing rules force them to reduce their capacity by 50-75%. Many will just decide not to bother reopening. Get it wrong and the entire sector will be annihilated. Was reading about English golf courses opening on Wednesday. No rakes in bunkers, no touching the flagpole. Seats and benches removed from courses. Foam placed in holes to stop the ball dropping into the hole, which would mean you have to reach down into the hole to remove the ball. Solo play only, unless you have someone in your own household who also plays. No scorecards. No changing rooms - change in car parks only. Nowhere to eat or drink before or after the round. You have to arrive just before your tee time, and depart immediately afterwards. No socialising with other players. No medals, no competitions. Lengthened gaps between tee times.... As much as I am keen to get back playing - in the name of actual fcuk... If pubs and restaurants have to behave like this - the next time I would even want to go to a pub or restaurant will likely be in a couple of years time. When you add in that you will likely be asked to wear a mask, by a mask wearing, glove wearing waiter, and treated like you have leprosy by anyone you don’t keep 2m or more away from, with anyone coughing being looked at like they have three heads... Just surreal. Looking forward to going for a curry and a pint - in 2022, if anywhere is left to get them. Edited May 11, 2020 by pozbaird 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 I hate not being able to use a scorecard in the pub right enough... I thought we had maybe moved away from the hysteria phase, but clearly not. Day 1 of BJ easing restrictions down south and everyone is acting like the world is about to end. Part of the plan is regional restrictions if their are break outs. With that in mind what happens in London doesn't directly affect those in Scotland. However if adverse effects are minimal the it will be comforting all the same. By the time we get to July we will have plenty info from elsewhere which shows the impact of bars and restaurants on infections. I doubt the waiter / barman will be wearing gloves. For the same reason they don't wear gloves in McDonald's or KFC - they are no more effective in that environment than regular handwashing, and changing them for every customer is not practical. And if they are wearing a mask? Who actually cares? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasy23 Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 Was reading about English golf courses opening on Wednesday. No rakes in bunkers, no touching the flagpole. Seats and benches removed from courses. Foam placed in holes to stop the ball dropping into the hole, which would mean you have to reach down into the hole to remove the ball. Solo play only, unless you have someone in your own household who also plays. No scorecards. No changing rooms - change in car parks only. Nowhere to eat or drink before or after the round. You have to arrive just before your tee time, and depart immediately afterwards. No socialising with other players. No medals, no competitions. Lengthened gaps between tee times.... As much as I am keen to get back playing - in the name of actual fcuk... If pubs and restaurants have to behave like this - the next time I would even want to go to a pub or restaurant will likely be in a couple of years time. When you add in that you will likely be asked to wear a mask, by a mask wearing, glove wearing waiter, and treated like you have leprosy by anyone you don’t keep 2m or more away from, with anyone coughing being looked at like they have three heads... Just surreal. Looking forward to going for a curry and a pint - in 2022, if anywhere is left to get them.I work shifts and play a lot of golf at what other people would class as weird times, so I play a lot on my own anyway. Most if those other restrictions had been put on place voluntarily before the lockdown by most courses any way.In other news, Trump continues to make Johnson look like an elder statesman. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 7 hours ago, Thereisalight.. said: I honestly didn’t know we had over 2000 deaths in Scotland so far. Last I heard it was about 1800 I thought we were up at 3000, might be wrong as I've stopped tracking it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 9 hours ago, renton said: Assuming people are allowed to work while being on furlough. Otherwise it's just over half your income with all your outgoings Most people don't have the same level of outgoings by virtue of no travel to work, no pubs, restaurants, leisure etc. Which is why - leaving aside personal and family inconvenience - so many people are quite happy to see lockdown measures continue for the foreseeable while they're getting paid handily to watch Judge Judy every day. A reduction to 60% - and only from July - makes the tab that everyone will be picking up for this scheme rather more apparent to those who benefit most from it. We should be expecting a much more credible and targeted response after fully eight weeks of a lockdown than 'EVERYTHING MUST STAY IN PLACE' and if adjusting the furlough makes more people question the continued worth of these broad brush 'emergency' measures then all the better. Edited May 12, 2020 by vikingTON 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dysartrovers Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 It's not necessarily topped up. I'm on 80% and that's all I get. My partner is self employed but had only submitted 3 months tax returns by the deadline so who knows if we will get amything. If it drops to 60% we couldn't live Atm its 80% and topped up so 60% and topped up is possible for some? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 43 minutes ago, ayrmad said: I thought we were up at 3000, might be wrong as I've stopped tracking it. That’s the official figure. I still think the best indicator is the difference between the existing level of mortalities and those normally suffered over the same period in previous years. Using that measure the figure is about 50% higher. Edited May 12, 2020 by Granny Danger 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendan Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 8 hours ago, renton said: Assuming people are allowed to work while being on furlough. Otherwise it's just over half your income with all your outgoings But you'd pay proportionately more tax and (for most people) NI on that 40%, would need to pay for transportation, and you'd probably spend quite a bit on lunch, snacks and other work-induced spending. So it's quite a bit over half net income with fewer outgoings, not taking into account that simply having time to do stuff yourself saves money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendan Posted May 12, 2020 Share Posted May 12, 2020 8 hours ago, renton said: On the basis that TTI is useless to us above a certain R number, it probably didnt make sense putting plans in place much before has done. The health boards are all reporting their cases, but so it goes that the statistical infection rate is still too high to trace and isolate by cluster. The signal to noise figure is too low. But TTI isn't useless above a certain number unless you've accepted the herd immunity route. We are past the peak, so even doing TTI only for some cases would clearly accelerate the decline and speed up the opening up. It's just another government failure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.