Wee-Bey Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 21 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I loved living in Carlton Terrace - EH7 - in the late 90s/early noughties and have walked up Calton Hill via Regent Gardens many a time. My younger two were born there. Edinburgh is a fantastic city with a rich history and seeing the likes of Lorna Slater mouthing off without knowing much about Scotland or Edinburgh's past is, frankly, depressing. Calton Hill is one of the best spots in the city. An eclectic mix of stuff up there that would be relatively unremarkable on its own but all together makes it a pretty cool place. Now with views of a giant golden turd though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 34 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: I loved living in Carlton Terrace - EH7 - in the late 90s/early noughties and have walked up Calton Hill via Regent Gardens many a time. My younger two were born there. Now tell us about the period you spent living in Kensington Palace mews and your uncle who works for Nintendo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 The monarchy should be privatised. If it was self-funded there'd be little complaint. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 On 06/05/2023 at 16:45, Oceanlineayr said: The apple hasn't fallen far from the tree as they say. Dunno if anyone’s ever seen the film Stepbrothers, Will Ferrells brother in the film is called Derek, the character is introduced singing in the car with his family, the wee boy in that could be williams wean. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Steele Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 And that politician whippersnapper, she knows very little of Edinburgh's history. I lived there and walked up a hill. I loved it there. Not the same anymore. Very depressing. Tartan gonks, ad nauseam. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crùbag Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 Heh! 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 1 hour ago, FreedomFarter said: The monarchy should be privatised. If it was self-funded there'd be little complaint. If you take the Crown Estates as being the Monarchy's own (and I could argue either way) then it is pretty-much self-funded. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 56 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: If you take the Crown Estates as being the Monarchy's own (and I could argue either way) then it is pretty-much self-funded. No you couldn’t. The clue is in the name: the Crown Estate. It’s the property of the “Crown”, not the monarchy. The monarchy happens to be the face of the Crown under the present constitutional setup, but if the constitution was legally altered to abolish that and institute something else as the face of the Crown, the ex royals would walk away without the Estates (as Edward VIII did). Even under the current system, if Charlie tried to claim the Crown Estates were his, he’d also be claiming responsibility for paying for the UK’s governance … and good luck making the revenue of the Crown Estates cover that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 9 minutes ago, Leith Green said: That'll be Coppies Bar in Bathgate 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 14 minutes ago, StellarHibee said: That'll be Coppies Bar in Bathgate Those children are beyond help.......already. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 6 minutes ago, Leith Green said: Those children are beyond help.......already. As are the "women". 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 8, 2023 Share Posted May 8, 2023 1 hour ago, Antlion said: No you couldn’t. The clue is in the name: the Crown Estate. It’s the property of the “Crown”, not the monarchy. The monarchy happens to be the face of the Crown under the present constitutional setup, but if the constitution was legally altered to abolish that and institute something else as the face of the Crown, the ex royals would walk away without the Estates (as Edward VIII did). Even under the current system, if Charlie tried to claim the Crown Estates were his, he’d also be claiming responsibility for paying for the UK’s governance … and good luck making the revenue of the Crown Estates cover that. Welsh opinion is that they're not his: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/most-welsh-people-believe-crown-26854998.amp 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 Did anyone else watch the C4 show about the Maitlis interview with Nonce Andrew? I thought he was thick and arrogant before it, but listening to the programme producer and Maitlis, it seems I had underestimated just how thick and arrogant 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 On 08/05/2023 at 20:15, Leith Green said: It always makes me laugh that these brain donors seemingly do not realise that the entire Royal Family think that they are scum and would not piss on them if they were on fire. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted May 10, 2023 Share Posted May 10, 2023 I've noticed that Chuckles' missus seems to have blagged the title Queen Camilla after all. Many moons ago, I'm sure I remember there being some agreement that she'd never get that title due to being a divorcee, or an adulterer, or being a slightly different brand of Christian, or not being Diana, Princess of All Our Hearts, or some other guff. People were frothing at the concept thirty or so years ago, but I guess it wasn't that important after all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted May 11, 2023 Share Posted May 11, 2023 11 hours ago, BTFD said: I've noticed that Chuckles' missus seems to have blagged the title Queen Camilla after all. Many moons ago, I'm sure I remember there being some agreement that she'd never get that title due to being a divorcee, or an adulterer, or being a slightly different brand of Christian, or not being Diana, Princess of All Our Hearts, or some other guff. People were frothing at the concept thirty or so years ago, but I guess it wasn't that important after all. Before getting together with Diana, Dodi Fayed had been in a long term relationship with Claudia Christian (Ivanova in Babylon 5). Spoiler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurkst Posted May 14, 2023 Share Posted May 14, 2023 Imagine thinking this is how you want the country to be led for the rest of the century... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 Is Anderson actually this thick or is it all an elaborate act? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 17, 2023 Share Posted May 17, 2023 I hope NYPD charge the pair of attention seeking liars with wasting police time 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.