Jump to content

Titanic II


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ClydeTon said:

I for one haven't.

An uneducated guess I would forward is that the ship was filled with lower class folk?

Absolutely...

Culturally also more 'romance' steaming headlong into an icefield then slowing sinking with associated drama (unsinkable/SOS/lifeboat away/Carpathia/band playing/etc.), than hitting a collier with everybody in bed and rolling over.

Reflecting this: don't suppose many millionaires want to visit the wreck of Empress of Ireland... even though - indeed partly because - she's only 130 feet down in the St Lawrence River.

Edited by HibeeJibee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AuAl said:

What a daft thing to do.

Find the general response to this to be ridiculous and OTT. 

Migrant boat sinks in the Med with literally hundreds of lives lost and you're lucky if it stays in the news for 1 day and hardly anyone questions the lack of support or help for the vessel.

Some mad billionaire c**t and his mates jump in a submersible operated by a playstation controller, it all goes tits up, and it dominates the news cycle for days, with countless resources out to try and find it.

A cross Channel swimmer went missing and the search was called off after a day. 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/firefighters-chilling-final-post-before-30298269

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Derry Alli said:

Is it really?

Is it any different than a boy on £30k spending money to go and see the likes of Stonehenge?

No,not even remotely,that's not how bragging rights work

99.9% of p&b posters could make a day of it at Stonehenge if they so desired

Few,of any,on here could afford to take a wee trip down to the Titanic for 225K,hence the bragging rights(if they're so minded) for those that can 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was hoping to see some other billionaires like Branson and Musk get together to try and find it.

Except this time they go down in an even smaller, more shoddy submersible which uses a Nintendo WII remote to navigate.

Missed opportunity imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn’t look like a last-gasp dramatic rescue with thirty seconds of oxygen left. That’ll be Spielberg deleting his ‘film rights’ e-mail to OceanGate as we speak then.

Edited by pozbaird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously this pretty unique and specialised, and no two rescues are the same but I hope performative grief over these people in the media doesn't prevent a conversation about the response, compared to what you or I might expect if we found ourselves in a tight spot (which would almost certainly NOT be an expensive and showy risk, on a rich boys toy adventure to the most inhospitable place* on the planet), and how the response differs from that towards refugees who are instead having hate poured onto them for political points. It 100% needs to be spoken about. 

 

*Not you this time Ibrox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pozbaird said:

Doesn’t look like a last-gasp dramatic rescue with thirty seconds of oxygen left. That’ll be Spielberg deleting his ‘film rights’ e-mail to OceanGate as we speak then.

This would be more in James Cameron's ballpark anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pozbaird said:

Doesn’t look like a last-gasp dramatic rescue with thirty seconds of oxygen left. That’ll be Spielberg deleteing his ‘film rights’ e-mail to OceanGate as we speak then.

"The rescue efforts aren't working, we can't reach you"

"You're going to need to re-route power into the remains of the titanic to sail to safety"

"We have your mate here who was supposed to join you in the submersible but couldn't at the last minute due to some daft reason, he'll talk you through the process"

Edited by AuAl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the subject of conversations to be had after this, I wonder if "Attention rich ghouls: leave that mass gravesite that no one else can afford to visit, but yet must foot the bill for your rescue from, the f**k alone" will also figure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aim Here said:

That wasn't Spielberg either. Ron Howard.

Fcuk. I’ve had a ‘mare. Of course it was. As I was typing, in my brain, I thought Apollo 13 was a Spielberg job. Of course it was Ron Howard.

Consider my brain well and truly scrambled today. I accept the scorn coming my way with good grace. 😎
 

 

C92949F7-F4FC-4FFD-AA92-20A8B7A48618.jpeg

Edited by pozbaird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...