Jump to content

The US Presidential election prediction thread


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a bid by Texas Republicans to block Election Day drive-through voting in Harris County.

 

https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/11/03/court-denies-gop-request-block-drive-through-voting-in-harris-county-texas

 

However, 9 of the 10 are closed today because they are not permanent buildings - it does thankfully mean that 127,000 votes already cast will stand.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, NotThePars said:

Swampy was clearly a distinct poster from Banana. Swampy was also far cleverer than Banana. He was an oddball that was driven insane by something. The Nick Land of P&B.

Swampy was an absolute top poster before he went nuts.

No kings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that Asian American voting patterns are similar to Hispanic in that their family country of origin is said to play a big role in how they vote, ie Cuban and Venezuelan emigres are more likely to vote Trump than Mexicans. Not surprising to those who remember the "Boat People" that Vietnamese strongly favour the Republican Party.
 Screen-Shot-2020-09-17-at-6.52.56-PM.png?w=1150&key=033e53cc32abd0b28bbb1f86e5c1068e01b5f39f52cf0b65d47991aa03413554

The National Committee of Asian American Republicans endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden on Friday, four days before Election Day - they backed Trump in 2016.



https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/asian-american-republicans-endorse-biden-trump-swing-state-chances-2020-11%3famp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has denied a bid by Texas Republicans to block Election Day drive-through voting in Harris County.

 

https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/11/03/court-denies-gop-request-block-drive-through-voting-in-harris-county-texas

 

However, 9 of the 10 are closed today because they are not permanent buildings - it does thankfully mean that 127,000 votes already cast will stand.

 

 

That isn't over yet, or at least not if Biden wins by fewer that 127,000 votes.

"He [the Judge] also ordered that records of votes cast in the drive-through facilities be maintained in case his decision is reversed on appeal."

Edited by Bully Wee Villa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't over yet, or at least not if Biden wins by fewer that 127,000 votes.

"He [the Judge] also ordered that records of votes cast in the drive-through facilities be maintained in case his decision is reversed on appeal."

Just keeping by the book - legal experts think most of these appeals will be thrown out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sugar_Army said:

Got a few American friends from both sides of the fence.  All of them are genuinely fearful of trouble regardless which side wins.

Get rid of the friends from the Trump "side of the fence".

 

Edited by Bully Wee Villa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't it be a (Republican) Supreme Court that has the final say if it goes far enough? 
There are various stages it would need to go through before getting there.

The presumption that Trump's woman is there for him I think is erroneous - she is there for the much wider Conservative agenda like abortion rights.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't talking so much about that as the Texas Supreme Court, don't states take care of their own voting legislature? I seem to remember Jeb Bush being heavily involved in ensuring his brother's victory in Florida but I may have got mixed up.

At the US Supreme Court level even Trump's appointees have taken a dim view on courts overturning legislators decisions regards the running of elections.   

The challenges being made nearly all relate to decisions by state legislators on postal voting deadlines - challenges made by Republicans - they are likely to get short thrift.

 

Even Conservative state appeals court judges are disinclined to be seen to interfere - the law can be interpreted but not broken is the message.

 

This article explains why even Conservatives like Cavanagh might not back Trump.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/21540145/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-disputed-election-wisconsin-pennsylvania-north-carolina

 

This paragraph sums it up well:

 

"Kavanaugh’s primary message to federal judges is that they should stay out of the 2020 election. Let state legislatures decide how elections will be conducted in each state, for better or for worse. And don’t intervene even if those decisions are likely to disenfranchise voters."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

There are various stages it would need to go through before getting there.

The presumption that Trump's woman is there for him I think is erroneous - she is there for the much wider Conservative agenda like abortion rights.

I don't see Trump as a conservative like ACB- she strikes me as a more hardline, traditional Republican, where Trump is just a conman with no values who'll say whatever his vociferous base wants to hear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

At the US Supreme Court level even Trump's appointees have taken a dim view on courts overturning legislators decisions regards the running of elections.

 

The challenges being made nearly all relate to decisions by state legislators on postal voting deadlines - challenges made by Republicans - they are likely to get short thrift.

 

Even Conservative appeals court judges are disinclined to be seen to interfere.

 

Yeah.  It’s actually not the counting or not counting that’s been ruled on, either.  It’s the interference of the state.   And of course, there’s the fact of the matter that Republicans don’t want black people to vote and will do as much as possible to disenfranchise, and failing that intimidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

At the US Supreme Court level even Trump's appointees have taken a dim view on courts overturning legislators decisions regards the running of elections.  

 

The challenges being made nearly all relate to decisions by state legislators on postal voting deadlines - challenges made by Republicans - they are likely to get short thrift.

 

Even Conservative state appeals court judges are disinclined to be seen to interfere - the law can be interpreted but not broken is the message.

 

This article explains why even Conservatives like Cavanagh might not back Trump.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/21540145/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-disputed-election-wisconsin-pennsylvania-north-carolina

Apparently the Dems have a serious chance of winning the Texas State legislature which would flip all the gerrymandering for 2024. It's easy to forget about all the down ballot stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time out, one of the US news organisations had a live predictor that was about 90% in favour of Trump right from the polls closing - anyone remember which one that was, and if they're doing a similar thing tonight?

So very glad I'm not working tomorrow. No doubt it'll be a huge anticlimax, but this could be the best political entertainment since 1997.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...