Jump to content

Normal Island


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GNU_Linux said:

image.png.cb518a30e7ecf669c3a07e84bba1256d.png





 

They've left out some of the wierdness

Crypto group Copper served sushi off partially clad models
Digital assets company chaired by Philip Hammond held London party after industry conference

    The cryptocurrency company chaired by former UK chancellor Lord Philip Hammond hosted a party where guests were served sushi off two scantily clad models, raising new questions about the culture of the industry.

Copper, which stores digital assets for customers, held the private party last week at the five-star Mandrake hotel in London after a large crypto industry conference.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Remember what rich psychopaths used to do in the Eighties with naked women? You won't believe this, but they still do it!"

"Yeah, but this isn't news. Nobody did anything to curb their excesses, so obviously they would. It's like acting shocked that your employers still have fascist sympathies and are wealthy psychopaths themselves."

"...umm...oh, do you know any of the women so we can pay them for scud pics for our website? Thanks!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BFTD said:

"Remember what rich psychopaths used to do in the Eighties with naked women? You won't believe this, but they still do it!"

"Yeah, but this isn't news. Nobody did anything to curb their excesses, so obviously they would. It's like acting shocked that your employers still have fascist sympathies and are wealthy psychopaths themselves."

"...umm...oh, do you know any of the women so we can pay them for scud pics for our website? Thanks!"

Actually they weren't naked women, according to the FT, it was one man and one woman and they appeared to have flesh coloured body suits on

Which is unimpressive in terms of kinky perversion goes but probably a lot better in terms of food hygiene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Actually they weren't naked women, according to the FT, it was one man and one woman and they appeared to have flesh coloured body suits on

Which is unimpressive in terms of kinky perversion goes but probably a lot better in terms of food hygiene

I hope they didn't serve cocktail sausages on the chap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

Actually they weren't naked women, according to the FT, it was one man and one woman and they appeared to have flesh coloured body suits on

Which is unimpressive in terms of kinky perversion goes but probably a lot better in terms of food hygiene

Weak sauce indeed.

I do worry about the state of today's perverts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RawB93 said:

Feel like we're probably overdue a manky water/pollution thread?

The Pie and Bovril [insert username] Manky Water Thread. 

Wonder who would be the choice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scottsdad said:

Heard this yesterday. Genuinely shouted "Whit??" at the radio.

Seems to be a bit of confusion over what actually happened, and a few folk are saying it isn't anything malicious, just that it's normal for these photographers to take photos of small groups of children then edit them together into one larger photo, hence why some kids will appear in some snaps and not others. There are apologies flying left and right, so christ knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Boo Khaki said:

Seems to be a bit of confusion over what actually happened, and a few folk are saying it isn't anything malicious, just that it's normal for these photographers to take photos of small groups of children then edit them together into one larger photo, hence why some kids will appear in some snaps and not others. There are apologies flying left and right, so christ knows.

The implications are pretty clear to me. That company/photographer should be cut from every school contract immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Boo Khaki said:

Seems to be a bit of confusion over what actually happened, and a few folk are saying it isn't anything malicious, just that it's normal for these photographers to take photos of small groups of children then edit them together into one larger photo, hence why some kids will appear in some snaps and not others. There are apologies flying left and right, so christ knows.

 

5 minutes ago, Alert Mongoose said:

The implications are pretty clear to me. That company/photographer should be cut from every school contract immediately.

I'd like to think it was no more than pure coincidence that certain photos were available that contained kids without 'complex needs' rather than it happening by design.  I guess it depends on how many such kids we're talking about as that will influence judgement on how coincidental it was.

The alternative is the school and or photographer are a bunch of heartless arseholes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...